Abstract:Purpose: There is a dearth of literature in determining whether language groups for whom aspiration and/or voicing is phonologically contrastive show better perception relative to those who do not use these features contrastively and whether the cue type modulates perception in noise. This study addresses perception of laryngeal cues (voicing and aspiration) by Hindi, English, and Tamil listeners, in quiet and in noise. Method: Sixteen participants between 20 and 45 years of age were included in each of the three language groups. The stimuli were bilabial stops that contrasted phonetically in voicing and aspiration, voicing-lead [ba], short-lag [pa], and long-lag aspirated [pha], with one set corresponding to the Hindi phonemes /ba/, /pa/, and /p h a/ and the second set to the English phonemes /ba/ and /pa/ (which are phonetically [pa] and [pha], respectively). Tamil includes only the short-lag [pa] as a bilabial stop consonant. The stimuli were presented at 70 dB SPL, in quiet and in speech-shaped noise at a signal-to-noise ratio of 0. Participants performed two speech identification tasks and a speech discrimination task. Results: Patterns of perceptual assimilation related to the first language were observed in all three language groups, and accuracy was generally higher in quiet than in noise. Hindi participants identified the English /pa/ as Hindi /p h a/ and English /ba/ as Hindi /pa/. The American English participants identified Hindi /p h a/ as English /pa/ and both the Hindi /pa/ and Hindi /ba/ as English /ba/. In contrast, Tamil listeners generally perceived both Hindi and English bilabial stops as one category, regardless of voicing and aspiration. English and Hindi participants generally showed higher accuracy for native language stimuli. Patterns of assimilation in quiet and noise differed across language groups for each stimulus type. The aspirated stimuli were most likely to be misperceived in noise by all groups (often as /ha/). Conclusions: The results serve as evidence that listeners accurately access native language speech cues, even in noise. The results contribute toward a better understanding of cross-linguistic speech processing in noise.

The interacting effects of talker, contrast, and listener variability in cross-language speech perception

Perception of Voicing and Aspiration in Hindi, American English, and Tamil Listeners in Quiet and in Background Noise

Xie, Liu, & Jaeger (2020). Cross-talker generalization during foreign-accented speech perception

Comparing perception of L1 and L2 English by human listeners and machines: Effect of interlocutor adaptationsa)

The Effect of Intensified Language Exposure on Accommodating Talker Variability.

Cross-talker generalization in the perception of nonnative speech: A large-scale replication.

Interaction of long-term acoustic experience and local context information on the perceptual accommodation of talker variability

Compensation for coarticulation despite a midway speaker change: Reassessing effects and implications

Replicability of neural responses to speech accent is driven by study design and analytical parameters

Does race impact speech perception? An account of accented speech in two different multilingual locales

Effects of Listener Age and Native Language Experience on Recognition of Accented and Unaccented English Words

Perceptual Benefits of Linguistic Diversity and Language Background: Evidence from Auditory Free Classification of English Dialect Accents and Asian-Accented English

Individual differences in the consistency of neural and behavioural responses to speech sounds

Testing English Speakers’ Perception of Arabic Contrasts

Individual Differences in Cognition and Perception Predict Neural Processing of Speech in Noise for Audiometrically Normal Listeners.

Discrimination of Multiple Coronal Stop Contrasts in Wubuy (Australia): A Natural Referent Consonant Account

Perception of English Intonation by English, Spanish, and Chinese Listeners

Assessing the effects of "native speaker" status on classic findings in speech research

Multiple talker processing in autistic adult listeners

Within- versus between-speaker acoustic variability in Thai

English Vowel Perception in Spanish–English Bilingual Preschoolers: Multiple-Talker Input Is Only Beneficial for Children With High Language Exposure Levels