It takes a microbiome: commensals, immune regulation, and allergy.

M. Cernadas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201105-0828ED

IF: 24.7

2011-07-15

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Event-related potentials P_(300) with memory function and psychopathology in first-episode paranoid schizophrenia

LIU Wei-bo,CHEN Qiao-zhen,YIN Hou-min,ZHENG Lei-lei,YU Shao-hua,CHEN Yi-ping,LI Hui-chun

2011-01-01

Journal of Zhejiang University (Medical Sciences)

Abstract:Objective: To investigate the variability of event-related potentials P300 and the relationship with memory function/psychopathology in patients with first-episode paranoid schizophrenia. Methods: Thirty patients with first-episode paranoid schizophrenia(patient group) and twenty health subjects(control group) were enrolled in the study.The auditory event-related potentials P300 at the scalp electrodes Cz,Pz and Wechsler Memory Scale(WMS) were examined in both groups,Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale(PANSS) was evaluated in patient group. Results: In comparison with control group,patients had longer latency of P300 [(390.6±47.6)ms at Cz and(393.3±50.1)ms at Pz ](P<0.01),lower amplitude of P300 [(7.7±3.4) μV at Cz and(8.5±3.9)μV at Pz ](P<0.05-0.01).The memory quotient(88.1±10.0) scores and short-term memory,immediate memory in patient group were damaged significantly(P<0.05-0.01).In patient group,the latency of P300 was correlated positively with PANSS scores and negatively with WMS scores(P<0.05-0.01). Conclusions: First-episode paranoid schizophrenia has memory deficit,which can be evaluated comprehensively by P300 and WMS.The longer latency of P300 might be associated with the increased severity of first-episode paranoid schizophrenia.
[Primary progressive aphasia: its clinical variability: an analysis of 15 cases]

C Serrano,M Martelli,P Harris,G Tufró,C Ranalli,F Taragano,L Tamaroff,R F Allegri

Abstract:Introduction: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) represents a clinical syndrome linked to multiple degenerative diseases. The diagnosis of PPA is made when language is the only area of salient and progressive dysfunction for at least the first two years of the disease. Aim: To evaluate the neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric and language characteristics of the PPA. Patients and methods: 15 patients with PPA underwent language, neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric evaluation, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography and single photon emission computerized tomography. Results: We observed a clear distinction between the oral expression patterns; the patients were classificated by type of aphasia. The most common sign of PPA was a word finding deficit, also known as anomia. Seven aphasia type Broca, four sensorial transcortical aphasia, two aphasia type Wernicke and two anomic aphasia were found in our patients. Depression, apathy, anxiety and irritability were the most prevalent neuropsychiatric sign. Conclusions: PPA is a language-based syndrome, that include fluent (normal articulation, flow and number of words per utterance) and nonfluent form of aphasia. It has been considered a cognitive term, however, PPA is associated with high prevalence of psychiatric manifestations. More research it will be necessary to evaluate the prognostic value of them. The slow and progressive deterioration of language provides an interesting model to understand the mechanisms and biological bases involved in the linguistic process.
Ca(2+)-induced Ca2+ release in response to flash photolysis.

G. Lamb,M. W. Fryer,D. Stephenson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.8310298

IF: 56.9

1994-02-18

Science

Abstract:
Speech perception and language comprehension in primary progressive aphasia

Heather R. Dial,Rachel Tessmer,Maya L. Henry

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.010

IF: 4.644

2024-11-10

Cortex

Abstract:Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive loss of speech and language. Although speech perception and language comprehension deficits are observed in individuals with PPA, these deficits have been understudied relative to production deficits. Recent work has examined receptive language processing at sublexical, lexical, and semantic levels in PPA; however, systematic investigation of these levels of processing within a single PPA cohort is lacking. The current study sought to fill this gap. Individuals with logopenic, nonfluent, and semantic variants of PPA and healthy, age-matched controls completed minimal pairs syllable discrimination, auditory lexical decision, and picture-word verification tasks to assess sublexical, lexical, and semantic processing. Distinct profiles were observed across PPA variants. Individuals with logopenic variant PPA had impaired performance on auditory lexical decision and picture-word verification tasks, with a trend toward impaired performance on the syllable discrimination task. Individuals with nonfluent and semantic variant PPA had impaired performance only on auditory lexical decision and picture-word verification. Evaluation of the types of errors made on the picture-word verification task (phonological and semantic) provided further insight into levels of deficits across the variants. Overall, the results indicate deficits in receptive processing at the lexical-phonological, lexical-semantic, and semantic levels in logopenic variant PPA, with a trend toward impaired sublexical processing. Deficits were observed at the lexical-semantic and semantic levels in semantic variant PPA, and lexical-phonological deficits were observed in nonfluent PPA, likely reflecting changes both in lexical-phonological processing as well as changes in predictive coding during perception. This study provides a more precise characterization of the linguistic profile of each PPA subtype for speech perception and language comprehension. The constellation of deficits observed in each PPA subtype holds promise for differential diagnosis and for informing models of intervention.

behavioral sciences,psychology, experimental,neurosciences
A Clinical, Neurolinguistic, and Radiological Study of a Chinese Follow-Up Case with Primary Progressive Aphasia

Jiong Zhou,Jian-An Wang,Biao Jiang,Wen-Juan Qiu,Bin Yan,Yin-Hua Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2012.690426

2013-01-01

Neurocase

Abstract:Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the deterioration of language functions. The Han language bears some unique features from the Latin languages; however, the features of PPA in the Han language-speaking population are not well understood. In this study, we performed a 3-year follow-up on a Han language-speaking PPA patient with corresponding changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). During the early stage, linguistic analysis revealed several symptoms including difficulty with auditory comprehension, right-left disorientation, reading disorders, and agraphia, specifically the execution of serial oral instructions. This Chinese PPA patient presented with a reading disorder, but his word comprehension ability remained intact. There are two different possible modalities of incorrect writing in this case. The patient also presented with noun-verb double dissociation. The early-stage MRI showed atrophy of the left frontal lobe, which was most severe in the inferior frontal gyrus. Three years later, the patient was found to have progressive atrophy in the parietal, frontal, and temporal lobes, among which the frontal lobe remained the most severely affected region. The brain imaging of the Chinese-speaking PPA patient showed changes similar to those of a Latin language-speaking PPA patient. The prominent change was asymmetrical atrophy in the frontal and temporal lobes. This is the first report of noun-verb double dissociation existing in a Chinese-language speaking PPA patient. The dissociation may be related to an impaired function of the inferior frontal gyrus, which is likely associated with verb-naming in Chinese-speaking people. Several unique features were observed in this case, including impairment in writing ability.
Clinical and cortical trajectories in non-fluent primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer's disease: A role for emotion processing

Ramon Landin-Romero,Fiona Kumfor,Austin YS Lee,Cristian Leyton,Olivier Piguet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2024.148777

IF: 3.61

2024-01-29

Brain Research

Abstract:Objectives To examine the clinical trajectories and neural correlates of cognitive and emotion processing changes in the non-fluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) and the logopenic (lvPPA) variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Design Observational case-control longitudinal cohort study. Setting Research clinic of frontotemporal dementia. Participants This study recruited 29 non-semantic PPA patients (15 nfvPPA and 14 lvPPA) and compared them with 15 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and 14 healthy controls. Measurements Participants completed an annual assessment (median = 2 years; range = 1–5 years) of general cognition, emotion processing and structural MRI. Linear mixed effects models investigated clinical and imaging trajectories between groups. Results Over time, lvPPA showed the greatest cognitive deterioration. In contrast, nfvPPA showed significant decline in emotion recognition, whereas AD showed preserved emotion recognition, even with disease progression. Importantly, lvPPA also developed emotion processing impairments, with disease progression. Both nfvPPA and lvPPA showed continuing cortical atrophy in hallmark language-processing regions associated with these syndromes, together with progressive involvement of the right hemisphere regions, mirroring left hemisphere atrophy patterns at presentation. Decline in emotion processing was associated with bilateral frontal atrophy in nfvPPA and right temporal atrophy in lvPPA. Conclusions Our results show divergent clinical courses in nfvPPA and lvPPA, with rapid cognitive and neural deterioration in lvPPA and emotion processing decline in both groups and support the concurrent assessment of cognition and emotion processing in the clinic to inform diagnosis and monitoring in the non-semantic variants of PPA.

neurosciences
53 Case Study Comparison of Logopenic and Semantic PPA Variants within the Medically Complex Veteran Population

Angelina Witbeck,Elizabeth Kayvandovsky,Carly N Burger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617723003715

2023-11-01

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract:Objective: To explore the utility of neuropsychological testing for patients with Primary Progressive Aphasia and compare testing data for a Logopenic and Semantic PPA variants within the medically complex Veteran population. Participants and Methods: Both participants were referred by their psychiatrist due to memory concerns. The case studies testing data will be compared to look at the differences on testing between different PPA presentations within the Veteran population. Patient A is a 77 year old, right handed, African American, divorced man with approximately 14 years of formal education. Patient B is a 76 year old, right handed, Caucasian, widowed man with approximately 16 years of formal education. Results: Patient A displayed problems with single-word retrieval, repetition of nonsense words and sentences, comprehension, reading, spelling, and naming. He also displayed impairments in aspects of working memory, along with learning and memory. His cognitive profile raises concern for a logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia, which often has Alzheimer's disease pathology. Patient B displayed empty speech, impairments in fluency and reduced semantic knowledge that raises concern for a semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia. However, aspects of his presentation are not consistent with this diagnosis, specifically intact confrontation visual naming. Patient has a history of significant alcohol abuse, although he has mostly remained sober since moving to Texas. This evaluation cannot rule out the contribution of sustained alcohol use on his cognitive functioning; however, this is likely not the primary etiology given his significant language issues. Conclusions: Patients with medically complex histories and unclear timelines of symptom progressive make it difficult for diagnostic clarity. Diagnoses can be additionally difficult to determine at times when the clinical presentation is not as clearly defined in textbooks. This case study comparison displays the importance of integrating all data to determine the proper diagnosis to optimize patient care and provide recommendations tailored to that individual.

psychology,clinical neurology,psychiatry,neurosciences
Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia

Shalom K Henderson,Siddarth Ramanan,Matthew A Rouse,Thomas E Cope,Ajay D Halai,Karalyn E Patterson,James B Rowe,Matthew A Lambon Ralph

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.03.24314835

2024-10-04

Abstract:We investigated semantic cognition in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), including (i) the status of verbal and non-verbal semantic performance; and (ii) whether the semantic deficit reflects impaired semantic control. Our a priori hypothesis that individuals with lvPPA would exhibit semantic control impairments was motivated by the anatomical overlap between the temporoparietal atrophy typically associated with lvPPA and lesions associated with post-stroke semantic aphasia (SA) and Wernicke's aphasia (WA), which cause heteromodal semantic control impairments. We addressed the presence, type (semantic representation and semantic control; verbal and non-verbal), and progression of semantic deficits in lvPPA. Since most people with lvPPA have Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and are part of a broader multidimensional phenotype space encompassing AD subtypes, we compared semantic performance in lvPPA and typical amnestic AD (tAD). Given the differences in lesion and atrophy patterns in SA and WA versus semantic dementia/semantic-variant PPA patients, our second aim was to examine atrophy patterns in people with lvPPA and tAD compared to age-matched controls. Twenty-seven patients participated in the study. People were grouped into those meeting consensus criteria for lvPPA (n = 10) and others who may have previously satisfied definitions of lvPPA but had progressed with multi-domain cognitive impairments (herein referred to as "lvPPA+"; n = 8). People with tAD (n = 9) were relatively preserved across verbal and non-verbal semantic assessments. LvPPA patients were impaired on both verbal and non-verbal semantic tasks and their impairments showed the hallmark characteristics of a semantic control deficit. LvPPA and lvPPA+ patients showed effects of varying semantic control demands, positive cueing effects, and correlated performance between semantic and executive tasks. Whole-brain voxel-based morphometry, comparing each of the patient groups to age-matched controls, revealed significantly reduced grey and white matter in the bilateral hippocampi and lateral temporal regions in tAD patients. The lvPPA group exhibited an asymmetric pattern of reduced grey and white matter intensity in the language-dominant left hemisphere, including a significant portion of the lateral and medial temporal lobe. LvPPA+ patients demonstrated reduced grey and white matter in the left temporal lobe extending subcortically, anteriorly and posteriorly, as well as right temporal involvement. Our findings could aid diagnostic subtyping of PPA by adopting semantic control features and offer improved clinical characterisation of lvPPA in the trajectory of semantic decline.
Typical and atypical pathology in primary progressive aphasia variants

Edoardo G. Spinelli,Maria Luisa Mandelli,Zachary A. Miller,Miguel A Santos‐Santos,Stephen M. Wilson,Federica Agosta,Lea T. Grinberg,Eric J. Huang,John Q. Trojanowski,Marita Meyer,Maya L. Henry,Giancarlo Comi,Gil Rabinovici,Howard J. Rosen,Massimo Filippi,Bruce L. Miller,William W. Seeley,Maria Luisa Gorno‐Tempini,Miguel A Santos-Santos,Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24885

IF: 11.2

2017-03-01

Annals of Neurology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To characterize in vivo signatures of pathological diagnosis in a large cohort of patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) variants defined by current diagnostic classification.METHODS: Extensive clinical, cognitive, neuroimaging, and neuropathological data were collected from 69 patients with sporadic PPA, divided into 29 semantic (svPPA), 25 nonfluent (nfvPPA), 11 logopenic (lvPPA), and 4 mixed PPA. Patterns of gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) atrophy at presentation were assessed and tested as predictors of pathological diagnosis using support vector machine (SVM) algorithms.RESULTS: A clinical diagnosis of PPA was associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with transactive response DNA-binding protein (TDP) inclusions in 40.5%, FTLD-tau in 40.5%, and Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology in 19% of cases. Each variant was associated with 1 typical pathology; 24 of 29 (83%) svPPA showed FTLD-TDP type C, 22 of 25 (88%) nfvPPA showed FTLD-tau, and all 11 lvPPA had AD. Within FTLD-tau, 4R-tau pathology was commonly associated with nfvPPA, whereas Pick disease was observed in a minority of subjects across all variants except for lvPPA. Compared with pathologically typical cases, svPPA-tau showed significant extrapyramidal signs, greater executive impairment, and severe striatal and frontal GM and WM atrophy. nfvPPA-TDP patients lacked general motor symptoms or significant WM atrophy. Combining GM and WM volumes, SVM analysis showed 92.7% accuracy to distinguish FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP pathologies across variants.INTERPRETATION: Each PPA clinical variant is associated with a typical and most frequent cognitive, neuroimaging, and neuropathological profile. Specific clinical and early anatomical features may suggest rare and atypical pathological diagnosis in vivo. Ann Neurol 2017;81:430-443.

neurosciences,clinical neurology
Clinicoradiological and neuropathological evaluation of primary progressive aphasia

Dror Shir,Nick Corriveau-Lecavalier,Camilo Bermudez Noguera,Leland Barnard,Nha Trang Thu Pham,Hugo Botha,Joseph R Duffy,Heather M Clark,Rene L Utianski,David S Knopman,Ronald C Petersen,Bradley F Boeve,Melissa E Murray,Aivi T Nguyen,R Ross Reichard,Dennis W Dickson,Gregory S Day,Walter K Kremers,Neill R Graff-Radford,David T Jones,Mary M Machulda,Julie A Fields,Jennifer L Whitwell,Keith A Josephs,Jonathan Graff-Radford

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2023-332862

2024-03-21

Abstract:Background Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) defines a group of neurodegenerative disorders characterised by language decline. Three PPA variants correlate with distinct underlying pathologies: semantic variant PPA (svPPA) with transactive response DNA-binding protein of 43 kD (TDP-43) proteinopathy, agrammatic variant PPA (agPPA) with tau deposition and logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA) with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Our objectives were to differentiate PPA variants using clinical and neuroimaging features, assess progression and evaluate structural MRI and a novel 18-F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) image decomposition machine learning algorithm for neuropathology prediction. Methods We analysed 82 autopsied patients diagnosed with PPA from 1998 to 2022. Clinical histories, language characteristics, neuropsychological results and brain imaging were reviewed. A machine learning framework using a k -nearest neighbours classifier assessed FDG-PET scans from 45 patients compared with a large reference database. Results PPA variant distribution: 35 lvPPA (80% AD), 28 agPPA (89% tauopathy) and 18 svPPA (72% frontotemporal lobar degeneration-TAR DNA-binding protein (FTLD-TDP)). Apraxia of speech was associated with 4R-tauopathy in agPPA, while pure agrammatic PPA without apraxia was linked to 3R-tauopathy. Longitudinal data revealed language dysfunction remained the predominant deficit for patients with lvPPA, agPPA evolved to corticobasal or progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome (64%) and svPPA progressed to behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (44%). agPPA-4R-tauopathy exhibited limited pre-supplementary motor area atrophy, lvPPA-AD displayed temporal atrophy extending to the superior temporal sulcus and svPPA-FTLD-TDP had severe temporal pole atrophy. The FDG-PET-based machine learning algorithm accurately predicted clinical diagnoses and underlying pathologies. Conclusions Distinguishing 3R-taupathy and 4R-tauopathy in agPPA may rely on apraxia of speech presence. Additional linguistic and clinical features can aid neuropathology prediction. Our data-driven brain metabolism decomposition approach effectively predicts underlying neuropathology.

surgery,psychiatry,clinical neurology
Auditory Verb Generation Performance Patterns Dissociate Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia

Sladjana Lukic,Abigail E. Licata,Elizabeth Weis,Rian Bogley,Buddhika Ratnasiri,Ariane E. Welch,Leighton B. N. Hinkley,Z. Miller,Adolfo M. Garcia,John F. Houde,Srikantan S. Nagarajan,Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini,Valentina Borghesani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887591

IF: 3.8

2022-06-25

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a clinical syndrome in which patients progressively lose speech and language abilities. Three variants are recognized: logopenic (lvPPA), associated with phonology and/or short-term verbal memory deficits accompanied by left temporo-parietal atrophy; semantic (svPPA), associated with semantic deficits and anterior temporal lobe (ATL) atrophy; non-fluent (nfvPPA) associated with grammar and/or speech-motor deficits and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) atrophy. Here, we set out to investigate whether the three variants of PPA can be dissociated based on error patterns in a single language task. We recruited 21 lvPPA, 28 svPPA, and 24 nfvPPA patients, together with 31 healthy controls, and analyzed their performance on an auditory noun-to-verb generation task, which requires auditory analysis of the input, access to and selection of relevant lexical and semantic knowledge, as well as preparation and execution of speech. Task accuracy differed across the three variants and controls, with lvPPA and nfvPPA having the lowest and highest accuracy, respectively. Critically, machine learning analysis of the different error types yielded above-chance classification of patients into their corresponding group. An analysis of the error types revealed clear variant-specific effects: lvPPA patients produced the highest percentage of "not-a-verb" responses and the highest number of semantically related nouns (production of baseball instead of throw to noun ball ); in contrast, svPPA patients produced the highest percentage of "unrelated verb" responses and the highest number of light verbs (production of take instead of throw to noun ball ). Taken together, our findings indicate that error patterns in an auditory verb generation task are associated with the breakdown of different neurocognitive mechanisms across PPA variants. Specifically, they corroborate the link between temporo-parietal regions with lexical processing, as well as ATL with semantic processes. These findings illustrate how the analysis of pattern of responses can help PPA phenotyping and heighten diagnostic sensitivity, while providing insights on the neural correlates of different components of language.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Another side of the coin: Primary progressive aphasia in Chinese language

Boon Lead Tee,Maria Luisa Gorno Tempini,Ta‐Fu Chen,Raymond Y. Lo,Pei‐Ning Wang,Andrew LT Chan,Lorinda Li‐Ying Kwan Chen,Adrian Wong,Connie TY Yan,Joshua Tsoh,Chien Jung Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.052482

2021-12-01

Abstract:Abstract Background Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative syndrome that presents with speech and language impairments and is generally classified into three variants: semantic (svPPA), nonfluent/ agrammatic (nfvPPA), and logopenic variants (lvPPA). Current understanding of PPA has been mostly derived from English language patients. Expanding PPA research into non‐English languages encourages language‐specific linguistic‐adapted assessments and enriches our knowledge in linguistic features distinct from English language. This presentation focuses on three Chinese linguistic features that differ from English language: lexical tones, classifier, and logographic script. Chinese is a tonal and classifier language in which tones are lexically contrastive, and classifiers are obligatory to quantify nouns numerally. It also adopts logographic script that has complex visuospatial configurations and weak grapheme‐phoneme correspondence. Method The CLAP ( C hinese L anguage A ssessment for P PA) battery is designed to characterize the neurolinguistics features of Chinese speaking PPA individuals. In CLAP classifier task, participants are asked to spontaneously produce classifiers specific to numerous nouns and presented with multiple choices when failed. To evaluate Chinese writing skills, participants are tasked with dictating 60 Chinese characters of varying lexicality, character frequency, and stroke number. The motor speech function is assessed by multiple repetitions of Chinese characters that differ in articulation places, manners, and tones. Results The CLAP project enrolled 20 controls and 33 PPA individuals (7 nfvPPA, 10 svPPA, and 16 lvPPA). In classifier task, svPPA and lvPPA scored lower (p<0.01), though lvPPA were more responsive to choices than svPPA (p<0.001). The classifier score significantly correlated with volumetric changes over the left middle, inferior temporal, and fusiform gyri, brain regions typically associated with semantic functions. For orthographic dictation task, all three PPA variants performed worse than controls (p<0.001), and distinctive dysgraphia phenotypes were noted in each variant (svPPA: phonological plausible and perseveration errors; nfvPPA: motoric, radical and morphemic errors; lvPPA: visual and stroke errors, P<0.001). In motor speech task, nfvPPA showed lower performance when tasked with repeating characters that vary in articulation places and tones (p=0.018, p<0.001) but not in articulation manners (p=0.076). Conclusion The clinical features and assessment strategies for PPA syndrome may vary across languages and should ideally be tailored linguistically.

clinical neurology
Challenges in diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia

Ellen C Clarke,Borna Bonakdarpour

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2019-230630

2019-11-10

Abstract:Two 68-year-old men presented to the behavioral neurology clinic with memory complaints. The clinical picture was complicated by bilingualism and psychiatric comorbidities. Based on a combination of cognitive and language testing, 5-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, both cases were initially diagnosed as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI). At follow-up, however, both cases' language profiles and neuroimaging had evolved to clearly indicate primary progressive aphasia (PPA) as the underlying condition rather than MCI. These cases underscore the importance of careful observation of clinical and neuroimaging data over time to reach an accurate diagnosis.
Lexical Markers of Disordered Speech in Primary Progressive Aphasia and Parkinson-plus Disorders

Shalom K Henderson,Siddharth Ramanan,Karalyn E Patterson,Peter Garrard,Nikil Patel,Katie E Peterson,Ajay Halai,Stefano F Cappa,James B Rowe,Matthew A Lambon Ralph

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.05.23298112

2024-08-22

Abstract:Connected speech samples elicited by a picture description task are widely used in the assessment of aphasias, but it is not clear what their interpretation should focus on. Although such samples are easy to collect, analyses of them tend to be time-consuming, inconsistently conducted, and impractical for non-specialist settings. Here, we analysed connected speech samples from patients with the three variants of primary progressive aphasia (semantic, svPPA N = 9; logopenic, lvPPA N = 9; non-fluent, nfvPPA N = 9), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP Richardson's syndrome N = 10), corticobasal syndrome (CBS N = 13), and age-matched healthy controls. There were three principal aims: (i) to determine the differences in quantitative language output and psycholinguistic properties of words produced by patients and controls; (ii) to identify the neural correlates of connected speech measures; and (iii) to develop a simple clinical measurement tool. Using data-driven methods, we optimised a 15-word checklist for use with the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination "cookie theft" and Mini Linguistic State Examination "beach scene" pictures and tested the predictive validity of outputs from Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) models using an independent clinical sample from a second site. The total language output was significantly reduced in patients with nfvPPA, PSP and CBS relative to those with svPPA and controls. The speech of patients with lvPPA and svPPA contained a disproportionately greater number of words of both high frequency and high semantic diversity. Results from our exploratory voxel-based morphometry analyses across the whole group revealed correlations between grey matter volume in (i) bilateral frontal lobes with overall language output, (ii) the left frontal and superior temporal regions with speech complexity, (iii) bilateral frontotemporal regions with phonology, and (iv) bilateral cingulate and subcortical regions with age of acquisition. With the 15-word checklists, the LASSO models showed excellent accuracy for within-sample k-fold classification (over 93%) and out-of-sample validation between patients and controls (over 90%), and moderately good (59% - 74%) differentiation between the motor disorders (nfvPPA, PSP, CBS) and lexico-semantic groups (svPPA, lvPPA). In conclusion, we propose that a simple 15-word checklist provides a suitable screening test to identify people with progressive aphasia, while further specialist assessment is needed to differentiate accurately some groups (e.g., svPPA versus lvPPA and PSP versus nfvPPA).

Neurology
Alzheimer'S Pathology in Primary Progressive Aphasia

Xiaolei Wang,Eunice Vincent,Summer Siddiqui,Katherine Turnbull,Hong Lu,Robert Blair,Xueling Wu,Meagan Watkins,Widade Ziani,Jiasheng Shao,Lara A. Doyle-Meyers,Kasi E. Russell-Lodrigue,Rudolf P. Bohm,Ronald S. Veazey,Huanbin Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.05.020

IF: 5.133

2012-01-01

Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract:Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder with language impairment as the primary feature. Different subtypes have been described and the 3 best characterized are progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA), semantic dementia (SD) and logopenic/phonological aphasia (LPA). Of these subtypes, LPA is most commonly associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, the features of PPA associated with AD have not been fully defined. Here we retrospectively identified 14 patients with PPA and either pathologically confirmed AD or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers consistent with AD. Analysis of neurological and neuropsychological features revealed that all patients had a syndrome of LPA with relatively nonfluent spontaneous speech, phonemic errors, and reduced digit span; most patients also had impaired verbal episodic memory. Analysis of the pattern of cortical thinning in these patients revealed left posterior superior temporal, inferior parietal, medial temporal, and posterior cingulate involvement and in patients with more severe disease, increasing involvement of left anterior temporal and frontal cortices and right hemisphere areas in the temporo-parietal junction, posterior cingulate, and medial temporal lobe. We propose that LPA may be a “unihemispheric” presentation of AD, and discuss this concept in relation to accumulating evidence concerning language dysfunction in AD.
Is descriptive writing useful in the differential diagnosis of logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia, Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment?

Emilia J. Sitek,Anna Barczak,Klaudia Kluj-Kozłowska,Marcin Kozłowski,Maria Barcikowska,Jarosław Sławek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pjnns.2015.06.001

2015-07-01

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Abstract:Current classification of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) encompasses three variants: non-fluent (nfvPPA), semantic (svPPA) and logopenic (lvPPA). Previously lvPPA was regarded as aphasic form of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, not all patients with lvPPA phenotype present with AD pathology. Despite abundant literature on differentiation of lvPPA from svPPA and nfvPPA, studies comparing lvPPA with AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are scarce. This study aimed at analyzing written descriptive output in lvPPA, AD and MCI. Thirty-five patients participated in the study: 9 with lvPPA, 13 with AD and 13 with MCI. Most aspects of writing performance were comparable in three groups. However, letter insertion errors appeared in 44% patients with lvPPA, while they were absent in AD and MCI. Patients with lvPPA used more verbs than patients with AD. Writing profile may complement other neuropsychological assessment results in the differential diagnosis of lvPPA. Letter insertion errors and frequent verb use may raise a query of lvPPA.

clinical neurology
Prevalence of amyloid‐β pathology in distinct variants of primary progressive aphasia

David Bergeron,Maria L. Gorno‐Tempini,Gil D. Rabinovici,Miguel A. Santos‐Santos,William Seeley,Bruce L. Miller,Yolande Pijnenburg,M. Antoinette Keulen,Colin Groot,Bart N. M. van Berckel,Wiesje M. van der Flier,Philip Scheltens,Jonathan D. Rohrer,Jason D. Warren,Jonathan M. Schott,Nick C. Fox,Raquel Sanchez‐Valle,Oriol Grau‐Rivera,Ellen Gelpi,Harro Seelaar,Janne M. Papma,John C. van Swieten,John R. Hodges,Cristian E. Leyton,Olivier Piguet,Emily J. Rogalski,Marsel M. Mesulam,Lejla Koric,Kristensen Nora,Jeéreémie Pariente,Bradford Dickerson,Ian R. Mackenzie,Ging‐Yuek R. Hsiung,Serge Belliard,David J. Irwin,David A. Wolk,Murray Grossman,Matthew Jones,Jennifer Harris,David Mann,Julie S. Snowden,Patricio Chrem‐Mendez,Ismael L. Calandri,Alejandra A. Amengual,Carole Miguet‐Alfonsi,Eloi Magnin,Giuseppe Magnani,Roberto Santangelo,Vincent Deramecourt,Florence Pasquier,Niklas Mattsson,Christer Nilsson,Oskar Hansson,Julia Keith,Mario Masellis,Sandra E. Black,Jordi A. Matías‐Guiu,María‐Nieves Cabrera‐Martin,Claire Paquet,Julien Dumurgier,Marc Teichmann,Marie Sarazin,Michel Bottlaender,Bruno Dubois,Christopher C. Rowe,Victor L. Villemagne,Rik Vandenberghe,Elias Granadillo,Edmond Teng,Mario Mendez,Philipp T. Meyer,Lars Frings,Alberto Lleó,Rafael Blesa,Juan Fortea,Sang Won Seo,Janine Diehl‐Schmid,Timo Grimmer,Kristian Steen Frederiksen,Pascual Sánchez‐Juan,Gaël Chételat,Willemijn Jansen,Rémi W. Bouchard,Robert Jr. Laforce,Pieter Jelle Visser,Rik Ossenkoppele

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25333

IF: 11.2

2018-11-01

Annals of Neurology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of amyloid positivity, defined by positron emission tomography (PET)/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and/or neuropathological examination, in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) variants.METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis with individual participant data from 1,251 patients diagnosed with PPA (including logopenic [lvPPA, n = 443], nonfluent [nfvPPA, n = 333], semantic [svPPA, n = 401], and mixed/unclassifiable [n = 74] variants of PPA) from 36 centers, with a measure of amyloid-β pathology (CSF [n = 600], PET [n = 366], and/or autopsy [n = 378]) available. The estimated prevalence of amyloid positivity according to PPA variant, age, and apolipoprotein E (ApoE) ε4 status was determined using generalized estimating equation models.RESULTS: Amyloid-β positivity was more prevalent in lvPPA (86%) than in nfvPPA (20%) or svPPA (16%; p < 0.001). Prevalence of amyloid-β positivity increased with age in nfvPPA (from 10% at age 50 years to 27% at age 80 years, p < 0.01) and svPPA (from 6% at age 50 years to 32% at age 80 years, p < 0.001), but not in lvPPA (p = 0.94). Across PPA variants, ApoE ε4 carriers were more often amyloid-β positive (58.0%) than noncarriers (35.0%, p < 0.001). Autopsy data revealed Alzheimer disease pathology as the most common pathologic diagnosis in lvPPA (76%), frontotemporal lobar degeneration-TDP-43 in svPPA (80%), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration-TDP-43/tau in nfvPPA (64%).INTERPRETATION: This study shows that the current PPA classification system helps to predict underlying pathology across different cohorts and clinical settings, and suggests that age and ApoE genotype should be considered when interpreting amyloid-β biomarkers in PPA patients. Ann Neurol 2018;84:737-748.

neurosciences,clinical neurology
A neuromuscular basis for the development of right inguinal hernia after appendectomy.

E. Arnbjörnsson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(82)90108-8

1982-03-01

Abstract:
Discriminating nonfluent/agrammatic and logopenic PPA variants with automatically extracted morphosyntactic measures from connected speech

Sladjana Lukic,Zekai Fan,Adolfo M. García,Ariane E. Welch,Buddhika M. Ratnasiri,Stephen M. Wilson,Maya L. Henry,Jet Vonk,Jessica Deleon,Bruce L. Miller,Zachary Miller,Maria Luisa Mandelli,Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.013

IF: 4.644

2024-02-03

Cortex

Abstract:Morphosyntactic assessments are important for characterizing individuals with nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA). Yet, standard tests are subject to examiner bias and often fail to differentiate between nfvPPA and logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA). Moreover, relevant neural signatures remain underexplored. Here, we leverage natural language processing tools to automatically capture morphosyntactic disturbances and their neuroanatomical correlates in 35 individuals with nfvPPA relative to 10 healthy controls (HC) and 26 individuals with lvPPA. Participants described a picture, and ensuing transcripts were analyzed via part-of-speech tagging to extract sentence-related features (e.g., subordinating and coordinating conjunctions), verbal-related features (e.g., tense markers), and nominal-related features (e.g., subjective and possessive pronouns). Gradient boosting machines were used to classify between groups using all features. We identified the most discriminant morphosyntactic marker via a feature importance algorithm and examined its neural correlates via voxel-based morphometry. Individuals with nfvPPA produced fewer morphosyntactic elements than the other two groups. Such features robustly discriminated them from both individuals with lvPPA and HCs with an AUC of 0.95 and 0.82, respectively. The most discriminatory feature corresponded to subordinating conjunctions was correlated with cortical atrophy within the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus across groups ( p FWE <.05). Automated morphosyntactic analysis can efficiently differentiate nfvPPA from lvPPA. Also, the most sensitive morphosyntactic markers correlate with a core atrophy region of nfvPPA. Our approach, thus, can contribute to a key challenge in PPA diagnosis.

behavioral sciences,psychology, experimental,neurosciences
[Simultaneous bilateral epidural haematomas].

M. Gelabert‐González,M. Iglesias-Pais,R. Serramito-García,J. Fernández-Villa,A. García-Allut,R. Martínez-Rumbo

IF: 0.817

2005-06-01

Neurocirugía

Abstract:INTRODUCTION Epidural haematomas are one of the most common complications of closed head injuries. Bilateral extradural haematomas are rare, usually acute, and generally associated with severe trauma and a high mortality. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this paper is to present six cases of bilateral extradural haematomas seen at our service during the last 24 years and found an incidence of 2.5% of all cases of extradural haematomas surgically treated. RESULTS There were 5 males and 1 female with a mean age of 32.6 years (range 16-55). In 3 cases haematoma was across the midline and in the other 3 cases haematomas was found at different locations on either side. Skull fracture was present in all cases. Surgical approach was the primary treatment in all cases. Mortality in our series was 50%. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral extradural haematomas is a rare condition and the prognosis is mainly dependent of the pre-operative neurological state.

It takes a microbiome: commensals, immune regulation, and allergy.

Event-related potentials P_(300) with memory function and psychopathology in first-episode paranoid schizophrenia

[Primary progressive aphasia: its clinical variability: an analysis of 15 cases]

Ca(2+)-induced Ca2+ release in response to flash photolysis.

Speech perception and language comprehension in primary progressive aphasia

A Clinical, Neurolinguistic, and Radiological Study of a Chinese Follow-Up Case with Primary Progressive Aphasia

Clinical and cortical trajectories in non-fluent primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer's disease: A role for emotion processing

53 Case Study Comparison of Logopenic and Semantic PPA Variants within the Medically Complex Veteran Population

Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia

Typical and atypical pathology in primary progressive aphasia variants

Clinicoradiological and neuropathological evaluation of primary progressive aphasia

Auditory Verb Generation Performance Patterns Dissociate Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia

Another side of the coin: Primary progressive aphasia in Chinese language

Challenges in diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia

Lexical Markers of Disordered Speech in Primary Progressive Aphasia and Parkinson-plus Disorders

Alzheimer'S Pathology in Primary Progressive Aphasia

Is descriptive writing useful in the differential diagnosis of logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia, Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment?

Prevalence of amyloid‐β pathology in distinct variants of primary progressive aphasia

A neuromuscular basis for the development of right inguinal hernia after appendectomy.

Discriminating nonfluent/agrammatic and logopenic PPA variants with automatically extracted morphosyntactic measures from connected speech

[Simultaneous bilateral epidural haematomas].