[Length of infant breast feeding in Warsaw in the postwar period].

W. Szenajch,J. Bogdanowicz

1951-08-01

Pediatria Polska

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Neonatologists' decision-making for resuscitation and non-resuscitation of extremely preterm infants: ethical principles, challenges, and strategies-a qualitative study

Alice Cavolo,Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé,Gunnar Naulaers,Chris Gastmans

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00702-7

2021-09-25

Abstract:Background: Deciding whether to resuscitate extremely preterm infants (EPIs) is clinically and ethically problematic. The aim of the study was to understand neonatologists' clinical-ethical decision-making for resuscitation of EPIs. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in Belgium, following a constructivist account of the Grounded Theory. We conducted 20 in-depth, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews with neonatologists. Data analysis followed the qualitative analysis guide of Leuven. Results: The main principles guiding participants' decision-making were EPIs' best interest and respect for parents' autonomy. Participants agreed that justice as resource allocation should not be considered in resuscitation decision-making. The main ethical challenge for participants was dealing with the conflict between EPIs' best interest and respect for parents' autonomy. This conflict was most prominent when parents and clinicians disagreed about births within the gray zone (24-25 weeks). Participants' coping strategies included setting limits on extent of EPI care provided and rigidly following established guidelines. However, these strategies were not always feasible or successful. Although rare, these situations often led to long-lasting moral distress. Conclusions: Participants' clinical-ethical reasoning for resuscitation of EPIs can be mainly characterized as an attempt to balance EPIs' best interest and respect for parents' autonomy. This approach could explain why neonatologists considered conflicts between these principles as their main ethical challenge and why lack of resolution increases the risk of moral distress. Therefore, more research is needed to better understand moral distress in EPI resuscitation decisions. Clinical trial registration: The study received ethical approval from the ethics committee of UZ/KU Leuven (S62867). Confidentiality of personal information and anonymity was guaranteed in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation of 25 May 2018.
Incorporating parental values in complex paediatric and perinatal decisions

Rosa Geurtzen,Dominic J C Wilkinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00267-5

IF: 37.746

2024-01-13

The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Abstract:Summary Incorporating parental values in complex medical decisions for young children is important but challenging. In this Review, we explore what it means to incorporate parental values in complex paediatric and perinatal decisions. We provide a narrative overview of the paediatric, ethics, and medical decision-making literature, focusing on value-based and ethically complex decisions for children who are too young to express their own preferences. We explain key concepts and definitions, discuss paediatric-specific features, reflect on challenges in learning and expressing values for both parents and health-care providers, and provide recommendations for clinical practice. Decisional values are informed by global and external values and could relate to the child, the parents, and the whole family. These values should inform preferences and assure value-congruent choices. Additionally, parents might hold various meta values on the process of decision making itself. Complex decisions for young children are emotionally taxing, ethically difficult, and often surrounded by uncertainty. These contextual factors make it more likely that values and preferences are initially absent or unstable and need to be constructed or stabilised. Health-care professionals and parents should work together to construct and clarify values and incorporate them into personalised decisions for the child. An open communication style, with unbiased and tailored information in a supportive environment, is helpful. Dedicated training in communication and shared decision making could help to improve the incorporation of parental values in complex decisions for young children.

pediatrics
Barriers and facilitators for parents in end-of-life decision-making for neonates at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A qualitative study

Veerle Piette,Laure Dombrecht,Luc Deliens,Filip Cools,Kenneth Chambaere,Linde Goossens,Gunnar Naulaers,Sabine Laroche,Luc Cornette,Eline Bekaert,Pauline Decoster,Kim Beernaert,Joachim Cohen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163221076365

IF: 5.7133

2022-02-12

Palliative Medicine

Abstract:Background: Mortality and end-of-life decision-making can occur in newborns, especially within the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. For parents, participating in end-of-life decision-making is taxing. Knowledge is lacking on what support is helpful to parents during decision-making. Aim: To identify barriers and facilitators experienced by parents in making an end-of-life decision for their infant. Design: Qualitative study using face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: We interviewed 23 parents with a child that died after an end-of-life decision at a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between April and September 2018. Results: Parents stated barriers and facilitators within 4 themes: 1. Clinical knowledge and prognosis; 2. Quality of information provision; 3. Emotion regulation; and 4. Psychosocial environment. Facilitators include knowing whether the prognosis includes long-term negative quality of life, knowing all treatment options, receiving information according to health literacy level, being able to process intense emotions, having experienced counseling and practical help. Barriers include a lack of general medical knowledge, being unprepared for a poor prognosis, having an uninformed psychologist. Conclusions: We found that clinical information and psychosocial support aid parents in decision-making. Information is best tailored to health literacy. Psychosocial support can be provided by experienced, informed counselors, social services and sibling support, distinguishing between verbal and non-verbal coping preferences, and calm, familiar architecture. Intense emotions may hinder absorption of clinical information, therefore interventions to aid emotion regulation and reduce cognitive load may be looked at in further research. Adjustment of the Situations, Opinions and Options, Parents, Information, Emotions framework based on our results can be evaluated.

medicine, general & internal,public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services
Hemoglobin Yamagata: hemoglobin variant detected by HbA1c test.

Chae Lim Jung,K. Kwon,K. Hong,Y. Sung,Seung-Tae Lee,C. Ki,Mi Ae Lee,W. Chung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.6.536

2009-12-01

The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine

Abstract:Hemoglobin (Hb) Yamagata is a rare Hb variant, which has been reported only twice-one case each in Japan and Korea. This variant arises from a Lys --> Asn substitution due to a mutation of AAA to AAC or AAT at codon 133 of the beta-globin gene. This study reports the third case of a patient detected with Hb Yamagata [HBB: c.399A>T; p.Lys133Asn] and discusses the effect of this variant on HbA1c measurement. This variant was detected in a 70-yr-old Korean man with diabetes mellitus during a routine follow-up. The HbA1c concentration determined using Variant ll Turbo (Bio-Rad, USA) was abnormally high at 47.9%. It was impossible to measure the HbA1c level accurately using Variant ll Thalassemia Mode (Bio-Rad, USA). However, the HbA1c levels analyzed by HLC-723 G7 (Tosoh, Japan), Cobas Integra (Roche, Switzerland) and NycoCard (Axis-Shield, Norway) were 5.0%, 8.0%, and 7.9%, respectively. This study shows that Hb Yamagata interferes with the accurate measurement of HbA1c levels in a diabetic patient. Taking these findings into consideration, we think that an immunoassay or affinity chromatography can be used as an alternate method for measuring the HbA1c level in a patient with this variant. In conclusion, a patient can be inferred to have an Hb variant if the HbA1c concentration is abnormally high or low or if there is a discrepancy between the results obtained using different methods, and if the clinical status of the patient suggests the presence of abnormal Hb. Subsequently, the HbA1c values can be determined by methods based on different principles.
Parental Contextual Factors and Decision-Making Related to Periviable Birth: An Integrative Review

Amy L. Wright,Elizabeth Mens,Gausiha Rathitharan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5565

2022-01-18

The Qualitative Report

Abstract:Parents facing a periviable birth, or birth before 25 weeks of gestation, commonly engage in antenatal consultation with healthcare providers to determine a plan of care. Parents’ pre-existing contextual factors, beliefs, and values influence their decisions regarding birth and the care of their infant. This study aims to understand the role of parental contextual factors and best-practices to their integration during antenatal consultation The Whittemore and Knafl (2005) approach to conducting an integrative review along with thematic analysis was employed to determine and present the findings. Results describe three themes related to how contextual factors influence parental decision-making: personal values and hope, religion, and cultural and racial contexts. Parental contextual factors are important to integrate during antenatal consultation, yet how to do this is relatively understudied. A more thorough understanding will facilitate more individualized and effective counselling approaches for parents facing periviable birth.
Parental experiences and coping strategies when caring for a child receiving paediatric palliative care: a qualitative study

Lisa M Verberne,Marijke C Kars,Antoinette Y N Schouten-van Meeteren,Esther M M van den Bergh,Diederik K Bosman,Derk A Colenbrander,Martha A Grootenhuis,Johannes J M van Delden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03393-w

Abstract:Parenting and providing extensive care to a child with a life-limiting or life-threatening disease while being aware of the future loss of the child are among the most stressful parental experiences. Due to technical and medical improvements, children are living longer and are increasingly cared for at home. To align healthcare professionals' support with the needs of parents, a clear understanding of prominent experiences and main coping strategies of parents caring for a child in need of palliative care is needed. An interpretative qualitative study using thematic analysis was performed. Single or repeated interviews were undertaken with 42 parents of 24 children with malignant or non-malignant diseases receiving palliative care. Prominent reported parental experiences were daily anxiety of child loss, confrontation with loss and related grief, ambiguity towards uncertainty, preservation of a meaningful relationship with their child, tension regarding end-of-life decisions and engagement with professionals. Four closely related coping strategies were identified: suppressing emotions by keeping the loss of their child at bay, seeking support, taking control to arrange optimal childcare and adapting to and accepting the ongoing change(s).Conclusion: Parents need healthcare professionals who understand and carefully handle their worries, losses, parent-child relationship and coping strategies. What is Known: • In paediatric palliative care, parents have a daunting task in fulfilling all caregiving tasks while striving for control of their child's symptoms, a life worth living and a family balance. What is New: • Prominent experiences were: continuous management of anxiety of child loss, feelings of uncertainty, tension with end-of-life decision making and engagement with professionals. Parents experienced unique significance to their child, reinforcing a meaningful parent-child relationship. • Relevant coping strategies were: suppressing emotions, seeking support, taking control to arrange optimal care and adapting to the ongoing changes. • To provide tailored support, professionals need to understand parents' perceptions, relationship with their child and coping strategies.
Balancing survival and suffering: factors influencing parental decision making after periviable consultation

Eric A. Raynal,Isabella K. Pallotto,Jennifer M. Brady,DonnaMaria E. Cortezzo,Ellen A. Lipstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02166-0

2024-11-10

Journal of Perinatology

Abstract:The objective of this study was to identify factors birthing parents consider related to potential resuscitation of a periviable infant.

pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
The Value of Parental Judgment in the Ethical Gray Zone of Periviability: Words Matter

Matthew J. Drago,Mark R. Mercurio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-065986

2024-09-03

PEDIATRICS

Abstract:The window of periviability in which a neonate has a reasonable likelihood, but not yet a high probability of surviving without significant morbidities, has shifted over time. The most recent American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines for extremely premature birth, while recognizing the imperfection of gestational age as a marker for fetal maturity, considers the window of periviability to be between 22 to 25 weeks' gestation. 1 Below 22 weeks, it is suggested that resuscitation not be offered because of poor outcomes, and at 25 weeks and above, resuscitation should be offered given improved survival and decreasing comorbidities. This leaves a gray zone at 22, 23, and 24 weeks inclusive where clinical outcomes are uncertain.

pediatrics
Bereaved Parents: Insights for the Antenatal Consultation

Marlyse F. Haward,John M. Lorenz,Annie Janvier,Baruch Fischhoff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731651

2021-07-12

American Journal of Perinatology

Abstract:Objective The study aimed to explore experiences of extremely preterm infant loss in the delivery room and perspectives about antenatal consultation. Study Design Bereaved participants were interviewed, following a semi-structured protocol. Personal narratives were analyzed with a mixed-methods approach. Results In total, 13 participants, reflecting on 17 pregnancies, shared positive, healing and negative, harmful interactions with clinicians and institutions: feeling cared for or abandoned, doubted or believed, being treated rigidly or flexibly, and feeling that infant's life was valued or not. Participants stressed their need for personalized information, individualized approaches, and affective support. Their decision processes varied; some wanted different things for themselves than what they recommended for others. These interactions shaped their immediate experiences, long-term well-being, healing, and regrets. All had successful subsequent pregnancies; few returned to institutions where they felt poorly treated. Conclusion Antenatal consultations can be strengthened by personalizing them, within a strong caregiver relationship and supportive institutional practices. Key Points

pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
Integrating parent voices into research at the extremes of prematurity: what are we doing and where should we go?

Katharine P. Callahan,Anup C. Katheria,Thuy Mai Luu,Rebecca Pearce,Annie Janvier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02165-1

2024-11-22

Journal of Perinatology

Abstract:When a baby is born premature, a landscape of potential problems replaces an imagined future. Outcomes become the measures of success. Researchers are recognizing that we need the direct input of parents to select meaningful outcomes. In this article, we describe how researchers and clinicians in neonatology have historically defined outcomes and the limitations of these methods. We chart the integration of stakeholders—patients and parents—into outcomes selection. 'Parent-important outcomes' are those deemed most important by parents, as the voices of their children. We outline a path toward determining parent-important outcomes in neonatology through mixed methods research. We conclude by suggesting how parent-important outcomes can be integrated into neonatal follow up research and clinical trial design. Ultimately, all researchers of prematurity aim in some way to improve outcomes that parents and patients care about. We hope this article will remind us of this beacon.

pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
Parental Experiences of End-of-Life Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a systematic review and qualitative data synthesis

Yanhui Ma,Junxiang Gao,Chongyang Zhang,Lihua Zhang,Ling Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108546

IF: 3.467

2024-11-17

Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract:Objective This systematic review and meta-synthesis aimed to explore the experiences of parents making end-of-life decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Methods We searched nine databases up to December 2023, including qualitative studies focused on parents' experiences with end-of-life decisions in NICU. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for qualitative research. A thematic synthesis approach was used for data analysis. Results Nine studies were ultimately included. Four themes were identified: Roles in Decision-Making, Factors Influencing Decision-Making, Decision-Making Trade-offs, and Emotional Experience. Conclusion This meta-synthesis indicates that factors influencing parents' end-of-life decisions in NICU are complex and challenging. This provides evidence for the development of interventions for end-of-life decision-making, suggesting that these challenges should be carefully addressed to reduce the stress associated with this process. Implications for Practice The findings will assist healthcare providers in considering the spectrum of parental perspectives in end of life decision making and provide guidance for the development of decision aids.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, interdisciplinary
Parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision making in poor prognosis childhood cancer: a scoping review protocol

Helen Pearson,Faith Gibson,Anne-Sophie Emma Darlington

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046284

IF: 3.006

2021-05-13

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction: Parents of a child with cancer want to be involved in making treatment decisions for their child. Underpinning and informing these decisions are parents' individual values and preferences. Parents of a child who has a poor prognosis cancer and who subsequently dies can experience decisional regret. To support parents, and potentially reduce decisional regret, identifying the values and preferences of parents who are making these treatment decisions may enhance the support that can be provided by healthcare professionals. An increased understanding will support future work in this area and identify research gaps that could strengthen support strategies in clinical practice. The aim of this scoping review is to explore parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision making when their child is receiving cancer-directed therapy for a poor prognosis cancer. Methods and analysis: The Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology will be followed. An initial database search of CINHAL and MEDLINE will be conducted to analyse the keywords using subject headings and Medical Subject Headings terms. Articles will be initially screened on title and abstract. The reference and citation lists of the full-text articles to be included will be searched using Web of Science. Articles will be independently reviewed by two reviewers and any discrepancies discussed with a third reviewer. Data extracted will be presented in tabular, diagrams and descriptive summaries. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. This review will inform further research with parents to understand their values and preferences when making repeated treatment decisions when their child has a poor prognosis cancer. All outputs will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.This scoping review is registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/n7j9f).
Positioning comfort measures in antenatal counselling for periviable infants

Katherine Carroll,Megan Thorvilson,Christopher Collura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13852

2024-10-12

Sociology of Health & Illness

Abstract:Caring for the extremely premature infant born in the grey zone of viability is the most difficult area of neonatal medicine. Little research has been done on antenatal communication between neonatologists and parents anticipating the birth of a periviable infant. This article analyses 25 antenatal consultations between neonatologists and parents in one Midwestern hospital in the United States of America. It explores how neonatologists position comfort care as one of two predominant care trajectories for extremely premature infants born into the grey zone of viability. We found comfort care featured minimally in and was often marginalised by neonatologists' language. The two dominant discourses contributing to this were acute medicine's life‐saving capacity and a limited temporal window marked by gestational age where comfort measures were deemed appropriate. Antenatal consultations framed by shared decision‐making could be approached as a form of care characterised by a relational openness and responsiveness to parents' views on care. This asks neonatologists to enter antenatal consultations for periviability without knowing ahead of time which care trajectory will necessarily call one's attention or the particular response one should take, thus highlighting the skills of reflexivity in addition to an attentiveness and openness towards those receiving care.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical,sociology
Personalized communication with parents of children born at less than 25 weeks: Moving from doctor-driven to parent-personalized discussions

Marlyse F Haward,Antoine Payot,Chris Feudtner,Annie Janvier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151551

Abstract:Communication with parents is an essential component of neonatal care. For extremely preterm infants born at less than 25 weeks, this process is complicated by the substantial risk of mortality or major morbidity. For some babies with specific prognostic factors, the majority die. Although many of these deaths occur after admission to the intensive care unit, position statements have focused on communication during the prenatal consultation. This review takes a more comprehensive approach and covers personalized and parent-centered communication in the clinical setting during three distinct yet inter-related phases: the antenatal consultation, the neonatal intensive care hospitalization, and the dying process (when this happens). We advocate that a 'one-size-fits-all' communication model focused on standardizing information does not lead to partnerships. It is possible to standardize personalized approaches that recognize and adapt to parental heterogeneity. This can help clinicians and parents build effective partnerships of trust and affective support to engage in personalized decision-making. These practices begin with self-reflection on the part of the clinician and continue with practical frameworks and stepwise approaches supporting personalization and parent-centered communication.
Aftracts of the Scientific Meeting of the Belgian Society of Nuclear Medicine

P. Devos,L. Mortelmans,L. J.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257335

IF: 10.057

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Abstract:
Shared decision-making in pediatric palliative care in the Netherlands

Michiels EM,Joren CY,Kars MC,Aris JL,Verhagen AAE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cppeds.2023.101549

IF: 2.557

2024-01-06

Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care

Abstract:Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process in which health care professionals (HCPs) involve parents and children - when appropriate- to decide together on future treatment. These decisions are based on values that are important for the family, goals of care and preferences for future care and treatment. Elucidation of these values and preferences is preferably done early in the disease trajectory via so-called Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations. In the Netherlands, ACP and SDM are being adopted by most health care professionals. This has happened only recently. Ten years ago, ACP and SDM were unknown concepts for the vast majority of Dutch HCPs. Today, interest in these conversational approaches is booming in both daily practice and in research. This rise has been reinforced by two recent major advancements in Dutch pediatric palliative care: the Individual Care Plan (ICP) and the Dutch Evidence-Based Guideline on Pediatric Palliative Care (DGPPC). Despite this positive evolution, a lot of work is still ahead. ACP and SDM demand a change in mindset from the traditional paternalistic approach by which the HCP 'knows what is best for this child' to a more humble and open approach in which (non-medical) factors that are important to the child and family and may influence the final treatment decision. Such changes in mindset don't happen overnight. In this article we describe the situation of pediatric palliative care in the Netherlands, with focus on the recent evolution of ACP and SDM.

pediatrics
Being a "Good Parent" to a NICU Infant With a Major Congenital Anomaly

Melissa K Uveges,Jill B Hamilton,Britt F Pados,Winter M Thayer,Pamela S Hinds,Marie T Nolan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001127

2024-02-01

Abstract:Background: In the United States, up to one-third of infants with a congenital anomaly require neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) hospitalization. Parents of these infants may have different decision-making priorities, which may be influenced by the timing of the infant's diagnosis. Purpose: (1) To compare the ranked importance of decision-making beliefs for parents of infants who received a prenatal versus postnatal congenital diagnosis and (2) explore how parents describe their decision-making beliefs. Methods: A cross-sectional, sequential mixed-methods pilot design was applied to collect quantitative data using the Good Parent Ranking Exercise and further explore parents' decision-making beliefs through qualitative interviews. Maximum difference scaling/hierarchical Bayes estimation and content analysis were used to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Results: Forty mothers completed the Good Parent Ranking Exercise and 20 mothers completed qualitative interviews. Four of the top 5 ranked parenting beliefs were shared by mothers in the prenatal and postnatal groups. Mothers in the postnatal group ranked "focusing on my child's quality of life" higher. Qualitative interviews revealed that previously identified decision-making beliefs were consistent in this NICU parent population, with 1 additional belief identified. Mixed-methods analysis revealed high concordance between the prenatal and postnatal groups. Implications for practice: NICU nurses need to know that decision-making beliefs for parents who receive a prenatal versus postnatal congenital diagnosis, while largely similar, may have differences. Implications for research: Future research should explore decision-making beliefs in demographically diverse parent groups (ie, fathers, partnered vs nonpartnered couples) and effective strategies for promoting NICU parents' decision-making beliefs.
An evolutionary comparison of plant histones.

S. Spiker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2795(75)90202-0

1975-08-19

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta

Abstract:
Parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision-making in poor-prognosis childhood cancer: a scoping review

Helen Pearson H,Gemma Bryan,Catherine Kayum,Faith Gibson,Anne-Sophie Darlington

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03635-1

2022-10-16

BMC Pediatrics

Abstract:Parents of children who are diagnosed with a poor-prognosis cancer want to be involved in making treatment-related decisions for their child. They often make repeated decisions depending on their child's response to treatment and can experience decisional regret as a consequence. Understanding parent values and preferences when making treatment-related decisions may help enhance discussions with healthcare professionals and identify additional ways of providing support to this parent population.

pediatrics

[Length of infant breast feeding in Warsaw in the postwar period].

Neonatologists' decision-making for resuscitation and non-resuscitation of extremely preterm infants: ethical principles, challenges, and strategies-a qualitative study

Incorporating parental values in complex paediatric and perinatal decisions

Barriers and facilitators for parents in end-of-life decision-making for neonates at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A qualitative study

Hemoglobin Yamagata: hemoglobin variant detected by HbA1c test.

Parental Contextual Factors and Decision-Making Related to Periviable Birth: An Integrative Review

Parental experiences and coping strategies when caring for a child receiving paediatric palliative care: a qualitative study

Balancing survival and suffering: factors influencing parental decision making after periviable consultation

The Value of Parental Judgment in the Ethical Gray Zone of Periviability: Words Matter

Bereaved Parents: Insights for the Antenatal Consultation

Integrating parent voices into research at the extremes of prematurity: what are we doing and where should we go?

Parental Experiences of End-of-Life Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a systematic review and qualitative data synthesis

Parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision making in poor prognosis childhood cancer: a scoping review protocol

Positioning comfort measures in antenatal counselling for periviable infants

Personalized communication with parents of children born at less than 25 weeks: Moving from doctor-driven to parent-personalized discussions

Aftracts of the Scientific Meeting of the Belgian Society of Nuclear Medicine

Shared decision-making in pediatric palliative care in the Netherlands

Being a "Good Parent" to a NICU Infant With a Major Congenital Anomaly

An evolutionary comparison of plant histones.

Parent values and preferences underpinning treatment decision-making in poor-prognosis childhood cancer: a scoping review