Abstract:Objective This study aimed to engage clinical and community stakeholders to create a prioritization matrix of interventions to reduce neonatal brain injury and improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. Study Design We collaborated with our community partner to establish a Lived Experience Advisory Group (LEAG). Faculty performed a literature review to identify neonatal neuroprotective interventions; additional priorities from the LEAG were also included. Project leaders scored and presented intervention bundles for impact. Stakeholder priorities for value/feasibility were obtained via questionnaire. Mean values were incorporated into a prioritization matrix. Results Themes from discussions with LEAG members included the role of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) parent, the experience of trauma, shared decision-making, communication and trust with the health care team, and bias in medical care. Five interventions were placed in the highest priority quadrant of the prioritization matrix: thermoregulation, maternal antepartum steroids, delayed cord clamping, optimized oxygen delivery, and optimized glucose regulation. Conclusion It is feasible to incorporate community and parent values into clinically oriented neuroprotective intervention bundles for preterm infants. This clinical–community collaboration is vital to ensure that our project objectives meet the needs and priorities of the population it is intended to serve. Key Points Including input from parent advisory groups supports interventions that meet the needs of families. Collaboration between clinical and community stakeholders can improve neuroprotective and neurodevelopmental strategies. Incorporation of clinical interventions into a prioritization matrix improves resource utilization. Five perinatal interventions were ranked highly for impact and feasibility in the prioritization matrix. E.S. made substantial contributions to the conceptualization, methodology, and investigation of the study, and co-drafted the initial manuscript. M.L. contributed to the investigation of the study and co-drafted the initial manuscript. N.M. and J.R. made substantial contributions to the conceptualization, methodology, and investigation of the study, and critically reviewed the manuscript. G.B., K.B., K.M., M.J., S.P., D.R., and A.S. participated in the investigation of the study and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the submitted manuscript. * These are co-first authors. Received: 19 June 2024 Accepted: 04 November 2024 Article published online: 04 December 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

Being a "Good Parent" to a NICU Infant With a Major Congenital Anomaly

Being a "Good Parent" to a NICU Infant With a Major Congenital Anomaly

A meta-ethnography and theory of parental ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit

A qualitative analysis of parents' experiences while their neonates with congenital heart disease require intensive care

Parental factors affecting their participation in decision-making for neonates with life-threatening conditions: A qualitative study Parents' participation in decision-making

Parental Experiences of End-of-Life Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a systematic review and qualitative data synthesis

The effect of illness uncertainty and self‐efficacy on the perception of shared decision‐making among parents of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

Parental impact during and after Neonatal Intensive Care admission

Living with a crucial decision: a qualitative study of parental narratives three years after the loss of their newborn in the NICU

Decision-making for congenital anomalies diagnosed during pregnancy: a narrative review

[Congenital anomalies of the central nervous system--from the pediatric standpoint].

Integrating Stakeholder Priorities for the Optimization of Care of the Preterm Infant in a Safety-Net NICU

Parental experience of interaction with healthcare professionals during their infant’s stay in the neonatal intensive care unit

How to Best Convey Information about Intensive/Comfort Care to the Family Members of Premature Infants to Enable Unbiased Perinatal Decisions

Integrating parent voices into research at the extremes of prematurity: what are we doing and where should we go?

Parents As the Primary Caregivers for Their Infant in the NICU: Benefits and Challenges

Supporting parenting during infant hospitalisation for CHD

Identifying Strategies to Improve Shared Decision Making for Pregnant Patients' Decisions about Prenatal Genetic Screens and Diagnostic Tests

Coparenting Patterns of Parents of an Infant With Complex Congenital Heart Disease: Qualitative Identification and Network Analysis of Effects of Infant Illness Severity and Guided Participation Intervention

Enhancing NICU Care and Communication: Perspectives of Moderately Preterm Infant Parents

Beyond the healthcare system: The societal and contextual factors impacting parents' participation in decision-making for neonates with life-threatening conditions