Abstract:Previous research suggestss that high social anxiety individuals may form biased interpretations of positive facial stimuli.It is suggested that social anxiety individuals may discount the positive social information,or even interpret it in a negative fashion.This biased interpretation processing might tremendously influence social anxiety's positive affect in a negative way,as well as their quality of life.So it is important to learn more about social anxiety's cognitive processing of positive social information.Recently,some researchers focused on how social anxiety individuals process positive social information.However,most of these studies used self-report as their experimental method,and may suffer from several methodological limitations.The present study aimed to explore whether social anxiety is characterized by an interpretative bias towards positive facial stimuli using a more objective and accurate method.The affective priming paradigm developed by Fazio,Sanbonmatsu,Powel,&Kardes(1986) was applied as a measure of socially anxious individuals' biased interpretative pattern towards positive faces.And in the present study,the emotional faces were used as the primes,while the positive and negative words were used as targets.The current study consisted of a 2(prime valence: positivevs.scrambled faces) × 2(target valence: positive vs.negative words) × 2(group type: highvs.low social anxiety group) mixed factorial design.Only the group type was a between-subjects factor.In each trial,a fixation was first presented for 500 ms,followed by a positive or a scrambled face for 200 ms.After the face disappeared,there was an interval of 50 ms,during which a grey screen appeared before a positive or a negative word was presented.This word remained on screen for 2000 ms or until the participants pressed the reaction key.There was a1000 ms interval between trials.Participants were asked to evaluate and categorize the affectively polarized non-social word targets.And they were instructed to focus on the task,and try to respond to the target words as quickly and as accurately as possible.Their reaction time and correctness were recorded,while only the reaction time was analyzed with the repeated measures ANOVA.After the prime task,participants were asked to evaluate the attractiveness of 10 neutral faces which were used to make the scrambled faces.Then,they were going to finish the Social Phobia Scale,and a questionnaire for personal information.After this,the participants were debriefed.The study found that the high social anxiety group and the control group exhibited different affective priming effects when primed by positive faces: In high social anxiety group,no affective priming was found;while the control group showed the typical congruency effect for positive facial primes.They reacted significantly faster to the positive targets than those negative words.In addition,the social anxiety group took significantly longer time to respond to the positive target words than the controls.The results might suggest that social anxious individuals have an interpretation bias towards positive faces.They may make less positive interpretations on positive social information.At the same time,the study showed that the affective priming paradigm can be successfully applied to test the positive cognitive bias in social anxiety group.

Further Examining Positive Affect in Relation to Worry: A Synergistic Effect Between Positive Affect Expressivity and Proneness to Positive Affect

Examining the Within- and Between-Person Structure of a Short Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: A Multilevel and Dynamic Approach.

Intolerance of Uncertainty and Worrying and Anxiety:Mediating Effect of Problem Orientation

Preliminary exploration of worry: Some characteristics and processes

Reduced positive affect on days with stress exposure predicts depression, anxiety disorders, and low trait positive affect 7 years later.

Ecological momentary assessment of the unique effects of trait worry on daily negative emotionality: does arousal matter?

A preliminary investigation of worry content in sexual minorities

Negative and positive attention bias in anhedonia and anxious arousal: Can depression and anxiety be distinguished by patterns of engagement and disengagement bias?

The influence of positive and negative affect on emotional attention

Affective Priming Effect of Positive Faces in High Social Anxiety Individuals

Negative affect instability predicts elevated depressive and generalized anxiety disorder symptoms even when negative affect intensity is controlled for: an ecological momentary assessment study

Daily stress and emotions in relation to fear of negative and positive evaluation

Positive affect longitudinally buffers the negative effect of health anxiety on gastrointestinal symptoms

Pleasurable emotions and internalizing psychopathology: A multi‐study examination of specificity and alternative explanations

From Information to Worry: How Selective Interrogation of Information Shapes Expectancies in the Prenatal Period

Do Proximal Risk Factors Mediate the Impact of Affect on Symptoms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder? An Extension of the Hierarchical Model of Cognitive Vulnerability

The Relation Between Worry and Mental Health in Nonclinical Population and Individuals with Anxiety and Depressive Disorders: A Meta-Analysis

Anxiety sensitivity and panic symptoms: the moderating influence of distress tolerance

Examining the Impact of Fear of Negative Evaluation on Prosocial Behavior

Aberrant positive affect dynamics in individuals with subthreshold depression: Evidence from laboratory and real-world assessments

Adaptive and maladaptive pathways of COVID‐19 worry on well‐being: A cross‐national study