The case for eliminating excessive worry as a requirement for generalized anxiety disorder: a cross-national investigation
Ayelet Meron Ruscio,Madeleine Rassaby,Murray B. Stein,Dan J. Stein,Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola,Ali Al-Hamzawi,Jordi Alonso,Lukoye Atwoli,Guilherme Borges,Evelyn J. Bromet,Ronny Bruffaerts,Brendan Bunting,Graça Cardoso,Stephanie Chardoul,Giovanni de Girolamo,Peter de Jonge,Oye Gureje,Josep Maria Haro,Elie G. Karam,Aimee Karam,Andrzej Kiejna,Viviane Kovess-Masfety,Sue Lee,Fernando Navarro-Mateu,Daisuke Nishi,Marina Piazza,José Posada-Villa,Nancy A. Sampson,Kate M. Scott,Tim Slade,Juan Carlos Stagnaro,Yolanda Torres,Maria Carmen Viana,Cristian Vladescu,Zahari Zarkov,Ronald C. Kessler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329172400182x
IF: 10.592
2024-10-05
Psychological Medicine
Abstract:Background Around the world, people living in objectively difficult circumstances who experience symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) do not qualify for a diagnosis because their worry is not 'excessive' relative to the context. We carried out the first large-scale, cross-national study to explore the implications of removing this excessiveness requirement. Methods Data come from the World Health Organization World Mental Health Survey Initiative. A total of 133 614 adults from 12 surveys in Low- or Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) and 16 surveys in High-Income Countries (HICs) were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Non-excessive worriers meeting all other DSM-5 criteria for GAD were compared to respondents meeting all criteria for GAD, and to respondents without GAD, on clinically-relevant correlates. Results Removing the excessiveness requirement increases the global lifetime prevalence of GAD from 2.6% to 4.0%, with larger increases in LMICs than HICs. Non-excessive and excessive GAD cases worry about many of the same things, although non-excessive cases worry more about health/welfare of loved ones, and less about personal or non-specific concerns, than excessive cases. Non-excessive cases closely resemble excessive cases in socio-demographic characteristics, family history of GAD, and risk of temporally secondary comorbidity and suicidality. Although non-excessive cases are less severe on average, they report impairment comparable to excessive cases and often seek treatment for GAD symptoms. Conclusions Individuals with non-excessive worry who meet all other DSM-5 criteria for GAD are clinically significant cases. Eliminating the excessiveness requirement would lead to a more defensible GAD diagnosis.
psychiatry,psychology, clinical