[Can a sensitizer potency be attenuated?].

H. Tanii

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.wadai15001

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Changes of the Adjacent Discs and Vertebrae in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Treated with or Without Bone Cement Augmentation

Xuan Lu,Jiang Yang,Zhiwei Zhu,Xiaoqiang Lv,Jialong Wu,Jiawei Huang,Liedao Yu,Zhiqiang Wen,Jin Luo,Yue Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.02.012

2020-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT:Although vertebral augmentation with bone cement has been commonly used to treat symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, relatively little is known about the impact of augmentation on the adjacent spinal components.PURPOSE:To determine the imaging effects of vertebral augmentation on the adjacent discs, the augmented vertebra, and the involved spinal segment.STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective radiographic study.PATIENT SAMPLE:Patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures who underwent vertebral augmentation or nonoperative treatments.OUTCOME MEASURES:On baseline and follow-up mid-sagittal T2W magnetic resonance images, quantitative measurements of disc degeneration, including disc height, bulging, and signal, vertebral height, wedge angle, and segmental kyphotic angle were acquired.METHODS:Lumbar spine magnetic resonance images of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures at a local hospital in Eastern China between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Student's t-tests and χ2 tests were used to examine the differences of baseline and changes over time between vertebrae underwent vertebral augmentation and those did not. Paired t-tests were used to examine the differences between baseline and follow-up to study the changes of adjacent disc degeneration, creep deformity of the vertebra and progression of segmental kyphosis.RESULTS:There were 112 acute vertebral compression fractures (72 treated with kyphoplasty and 40 with nonoperative treatments) in 101 subjects. At final follow-up (mean 21.5 months), the cranial disc of the augmented vertebra decreased in height (p<.001), and both cranial and caudal discs decreased in signal intensity (p≤.02). The discs in the nonoperative group did not undergo such degenerative changes. For the fractured vertebra, vertebral height significantly decreased (p<.01 for both) and vertebral wedge angle significantly increased (p≤.01 for both), regardless of augmentation treatment or not. Segmental kyphotic angle significantly increased in vertebral fractures that underwent vertebral augmentation (p<.001), but not in those underwent nonoperative treatments.CONCLUSIONS:Patients that underwent vertebral augmentation had more advanced disc degeneration at adjacent disc levels as compared to those without augmentation. The fractured vertebral body height decreased and the wedge angle increased, regardless of vertebral augmentation treatment or not. Vertebral augmentation may be associated with increased creep deformity of the adjacent vertebra and the progression of segmental kyphosis.
[Augmentation techniques for the treatment of osteoporosis-associated fractures of the extremities]

Carlos Pankratz,Christoph Dehner,Florian Gebhard,Konrad Schuetze

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-024-01414-4

Abstract:The current demographic development is leading to an increasing number of cases of osteoporosis-related fractures. Affected individuals are typically part of a vulnerable, predominantly geriatric patient group with limited physical resources. Additionally, the pathophysiological characteristics of osteoporotic bones with reduced bone quality and quantity, pose a significant challenge to the osteosynthesis techniques used. Achieving rapid postoperative mobilization and stable weight-bearing osteosynthesis to prevent postoperative medical complications are the main goals of the surgical management. In recent years augmentation techniques have gained in importance in the treatment of osteoporosis-related fractures by significantly enhancing the stability of osteosyntheses and reducing mechanical complication rates. The main options available are polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) augmentation and various bioresorbable bone substitute materials with different properties. Implant augmentations can be applied at various locations in the extremity bones and standardized procedures are now available, such as for the proximal humerus and femur. When used correctly, low complication rates and promising clinical outcomes are observed. This article aims to provide an overview of available techniques and applications based on the current literature. Guidelines and substantial scientific evidence are still limited.
Tips and tricks for using cement augmentation of pedicle screws and vertebral body replacements-A literature review supported by two case reports

V J Heck,M Rauschmann,T Prasse,J M Vinas-Rios,A Slavici

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.07.011

Abstract:Background: The prevalence of osteoporosis is escalating alongside an aging global population, increasing the demand for spinal surgeries, including those necessitating cement augmentation for enhanced construct stability. Objective: This article delves into the nuanced application of cement augmentation techniques for pedicle screws and vertebral body replacements (VBR), aimed at optimizing surgical outcomes in osteoporotic spines. Method: Drawing from a comprehensive literature review according to important clinical and biomechanical studies and the authors' clinical experiences, we elucidate strategies to mitigate complications and improve surgical efficacy. Results: Cement augmentation has shown promise in managing vertebral fractures and in securing pedicle screws within osteoporotic vertebrae, with the advent of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement marking a pivotal advancement in spinal surgery. We highlight intraoperative measures like the choice between pre-injecting cement and utilizing cannulated or fenestrated screws, emphasizing the importance of controlling cement viscosity to prevent leakage and embolism. Through two case reports, we demonstrate the practical application of endplate cementation following VBR. Conclusion: While the use of cement augmentation poses certain risks, its judicious application-supported by evidence-based guidelines and surgical expertise-can substantially enhance the stability of spinal constructs in osteoporotic patients. This allows a reduction in instrumentation length by enhancing biomechanical stability concerning pullout, bending, and rotational forces. Furthermore, the incidence of endplate sintering following VBF can be significantly reduced. Future research, particularly on antibiotic-loaded PMMA, may further expand its utility and optimize its safety profile.
[MODIFICATIONS OF CURARIZATION AFTER INTRA-ARTERIAL INJECTION OF THE LEG WITH ANP 235].

B. Tempo,G. Gatti

1964-11-01

Abstract:
An Outline on the Advancements in Surgical Management of Osteoporosis-Associated Fractures

Ibrahim A Hakami

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63226

2024-06-26

Cureus

Abstract:Osteoporosis significantly impairs bone density and increases fracture risk, representing a substantial global health challenge. The effectiveness of traditional treatments such as calcium supplementation and exercise in completely preventing fractures is limited. This review explores recent advancements in surgical techniques and treatment modalities to manage osteoporotic fractures better and improve patient outcomes. Osteoporotic fractures demand specialized surgical techniques due to compromised bone quality. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are minimally invasive procedures that provide rapid pain relief and structural support using bone cement. While vertebroplasty is effective, it carries risks of cement leakage and new fractures. Kyphoplasty, with added balloon inflation, reduces leakage risk and improves vertebral height restoration but is costlier. Cement-augmented screws enhance fixation but can increase adjacent fracture risk and pose long-term complications. Surgical advancements encompass robotic-assisted surgery, offering precision and accelerated recovery, alongside biologic agents like bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), which enhance bone healing while reducing secondary interventions and eliminating donor site morbidity. Bone graft substitutes such as calcium phosphate cements enhance biomechanical compatibility, decrease morbidity, and reduce fracture loss and pain. Balloon kyphoplasty aids in height restoration and pain relief and diminishes the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures. Bioglass scaffolds promote bone regeneration by improving bone mineral density and lowering the incidence of new fractures. Optimal perioperative care, including patient selection, nutritional management, and early mobilization strategies, is crucial for mitigating risks in vulnerable populations. While current surgical interventions provide significant pain relief and functional benefits, ongoing research and multidisciplinary collaboration are crucial to prospectively refine these techniques and reduce the burden of osteoporosis. New technologies, such as tissue engineering and gene editing, hold potential for future treatment paradigms.
Assessment of clinical, imaging, surgical risk factors for subsequent fracture following vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic patients

Zhi Chen,Zhipeng Yao,Chengjian Wu,Guohua Wang,Wenge Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04009-5

Abstract:Introduction: Currently, the risk factors for subsequent fracture following vertebral augmentation remain incomplete and controversial. To provide clinicians with accurate information for developing a preventive strategy, we carried out a comprehensive evaluation of previously controversial and unexplored risk factors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in lumbar spine who received vertebral augmentation between January 2019 and December 2020. Based on whether refracture occurred, patients were assigned to refracture and non-refracture group. The clinical characteristics, imaging parameters (severity of vertebral compression, spinal sagittal alignment, degeneration of paraspinal muscles), and surgical indicators (cement distribution and leakage, correction of spinal sagittal alignment) were collected and analyzed. Results: There were 128 patients and 16 patients in non-refracture and refracture group. The incidence of previous fracture, multiple fractures, and cement leakage were notably higher, relative cross-sectional area of psoas (r-CSAPS) was significantly smaller, CSA ratio, fatty infiltration of erector spinae plus multifidus (FIES+MF), FIPS, postoperative lumbar lordosis (post-LL), correction of body angel (BA), and LL were significantly greater in refracture group. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed previous fracture, cement leakage, post-LL, and correction of BA were independent risk factors. According to the ROC curve, correction of BA showed the highest prediction accuracy, and the critical value was 3.45°. Conclusions: The occurrence of subsequent fracture might be the consequence of multiple factors. Previous fracture, cement leakage, post-LL, and correction of BA were identified as independent risk factors. Furthermore, the correction of BA should not exceed 3.45°, especially in patients with risk factors.
Vertebral compression fractures: pain relief, progression and new fracture rate comparing vertebral augmentation with brace

Raquel Gutierrez-Gonzalez,A. Royuela,A. Zamarron

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07041-1

IF: 2.562

2023-11-18

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Abstract Background Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is the third most frequent fragility fracture in the world. Conservative treatment, vertebroplasty, and kyphoplasty are all recognized therapies. However, diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations must be more consistent when comparing clinical guidelines. This study aims to compare the efficacy of vertebral augmentation therapy and conservative management for treating VCFs, the risk of subsequent complications, and the length of hospital stay. Method All patients over 50 years old with a diagnosis of thoracic or lumbar VCF without underlying oncological process, treated conservatively or surgically, and consecutively attended at our department from January 2017 to June 2021 were retrospectively selected for analysis. Patients who missed follow-up or died during the first three months were excluded. Results A total of 573 cases were selected for analysis. Most patients were treated conservatively (85.3%). Both groups were homogenous regarding epidemiological and clinical features. The median time elapsed to achieve pain relief was significantly lower in the surgical cohort (4.5 vs. 10 weeks, p < 0.001), and the proportion of patients reporting pain at the first outpatient visit was also significantly lower with a vertebral augmentation procedure ( p = 0.004). The new fracture rate and the adjacent level rate did not differ significantly when comparing both treatments, whereas the progression of the diagnosed fracture was more frequent in the conservative group (4.8% vs. 29.7%; p < 0.001). The median hospital stay was significantly lower in the conservative group (3 vs. 10 days; p < 0.001). Conclusion Surgical treatment (vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty) of VCFs was associated with sooner pain relief without an increased risk of new or adjacent fractures. Moreover, the progression of treated fractures was significantly lower in the surgical cohort. The only unfavorable aspect was the more extended hospital stay compared with the conservative treatment group.

orthopedics,rheumatology
[Translated article] Management of spinal deformities caused by osteoporotic vertebral fractures

C Mengis,N Plais,F Moreno,G Cózar,F Tomé-Bermejo,L Álvarez-Galovich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.10.001

Abstract:Osteoporosis and fragility play a significant role in the treatment and planning of patients with deformity secondary to osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). The resulting deformity can present significant challenges for its management, both from a medical and surgical perspective. The need for a specific classification for these deformities, including the potential for the development of artificial intelligence and machine learning in predictive analysis, is emerging as a key point in the coming years. Relevant aspects in preoperative optimisation and management of these patients are addressed. A classification with therapeutic guidance for the management of spinal deformity secondary to OVF is developed, emphasising the importance of personalised treatment. Flexibility and sagittal balance are considered key aspects. On the other hand, we recommend, especially with these fragile patients, management with minimally invasive techniques to promote rapid recovery and reduce the number of complications.
The incidence of secondary vertebral fracture of vertebral augmentation techniques versus conservative treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dawei Song,Bin Meng,Minfeng Gan,Junjie Niu,Shiyan Li,Hao Chen,Chenxi Yuan,Huilin Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114544240

2015-08-01

Acta Radiologica

Abstract:Background Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) are minimally invasive and effective vertebral augmentation techniques for managing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Recent meta-analyses have compared the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures between patients treated with vertebral augmentation techniques or conservative treatment; however, the inclusions were not thorough and rigorous enough, and the effects of each technique on the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures remain unclear. Purpose To perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies with more rigorous inclusion criteria on the effects of vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment for OVCF on the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures. Material and Methods PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SpringerLink, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database were searched for relevant original articles comparing the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures between vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment for patients with OVCFs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) were identified. The methodological qualities of the studies were evaluated, relevant data were extracted and recorded, and an appropriate meta-analysis was conducted. Results A total of 13 articles were included. The pooled results from included studies showed no statistically significant differences in the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures between patients treated with vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment. Subgroup analysis comparing different study designs, durations of symptoms, follow-up times, races of patients, and techniques were conducted, and no significant differences in the incidence of secondary fractures were identified ( P > 0.05). No obvious publication bias was detected by either Begg’s test ( P = 0.360 > 0.05) or Egger’s test ( P = 0.373 > 0.05). Conclusion Despite current thinking in the field that vertebral augmentation procedures may increase the incidence of secondary fractures, we found no differences in the incidence of secondary fractures between vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment for patients with OVCFs.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Managements of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A narrative review

Devon Patel,Jiayong Liu,Nabil A Ebraheim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i6.564

2022-06-18

World Journal of Orthopedics

Abstract:Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are the most common fragility fracture and significantly influence the quality of life in the elderly. Currently, the literature lacks a comprehensive narrative review of the management of OVCFs. The purpose of this study is to review background information, diagnosis, and surgical and non-surgical management of the OVCFs. A comprehensive search of PubMed and Google Scholar for articles in the English language between 1980 and 2021 was performed. Combinations of the following terms were used: compression fractures, vertebral compression fractures, osteoporosis, osteoporotic compression fractures, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, and osteoporosis treatments. Additional articles were also included by examining the reference list of articles found in the search. OVCFs, especially those that occur over long periods, can be asymptomatic. Symptoms of acute OVCFs include pain localized to the mid-line spine, a loss in height, and decreased mobility. The primary treatment regimens are pain control, medication management, vertebral augmentation, and anterior or posterior decompression and reconstructions. Pain control can be achieved with acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for mild pain or opioids and/or calcitonin for moderate to severe pain. Bisphosphonates and denosumab are the first-line treatments for osteoporosis. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are reserved for patients who have not found symptomatic relief through conservative methods and are effective in achieving pain relief. Vertebroplasty is less technical and cheaper than kyphoplasty but could have more complications. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation can have a protective and therapeutic effect. Management of OVCFs must be combined with multiple approaches. Appropriate exercises and activity modification are important in fracture prevention. Medication with different mechanisms of action is a critical long-term causal treatment strategy. The minimally invasive surgical interventions such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are reserved for patients not responsive to conservative therapy and are recognized as efficient stopgap treatment methods. Posterior decompression and fixation or Anterior decompression and reconstruction may be required if neurological deficits are present. The detailed pathogenesis and related targeted treatment options still need to be developed for better clinical outcomes.
[Artículo traducido] Abordaje del adulto mayor con fractura vertebral por fragilidad ósea

A I Hormigo-Sánchez,M Neira-Álvarez,T Pareja-Sierra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.08.004

2024-08-09

Abstract:Osteoporosis is a metabolic and systemic disease characterized by alterations at the level of bone tissue with loss of bone mineral density, changes in microarchitecture, mineralization and remodeling that determine greater bone fragility and risk of fracture.Falls in the elderly are a risk factor closely related to fragility fractures and numerous studies demonstrate this relationship.Vertebral fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology differs from osteoporotic fractures at other skeletal sites, as only one-third are clinically recognized. In the elderly, the approach to osteoporotic vertebral fracture involves comprehensive evaluation of the patient since it is both a cause and a consequence of multiple geriatric syndromes. This fracture, in its acute phase and subsequently, can lead to destabilization of other organs and systems of the elderly, medical complications at different levels, functional deterioration, dependence, and even the need for institutionalization.Therefore, multiple assessment of patients with vertebral fractures is necessary, addressing not only the history and risk factors of osteoporosis, but also those factors that lead to falls, as well as a comprehensive geriatric assessment and the complications closely associated with it.In this chapter we address each of these aspects that are necessary in the individual and multidimensional approach to the elderly patient with vertebral fracture due to bone fragility.
Guideline for postoperative rehabilitation treatment following vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (version 2022)

许正伟,郝定均,程黎明,贺宝荣,陈伯华,陈晨,陈飞,陈建,陈其昕,杜良杰,范顺武,方忠,冯世庆,高延征,关海山,官众,江华,姜为民,蒋电明,蒋军,蒋阅,贺利军,贺园,李波,李涛,李建军,李喜功,梁益建,林斌,刘斌,刘波,刘勇,刘志斌,卢旭华,马超,钱列,全仁夫,桑宏勋,申海波,舒均,孙宏慧,孙天胜,谭军,唐明星,陶笙,滕红林,田耘,田纪伟,王强,王新伟,吴建煌,谢沛根,许卫红,颜滨,杨勇,殷国勇,于晓兵,曾玉红,张国庆,张晓勃,赵杰,朱悦

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20221020-00696

2022-01-01

Abstract:Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) can lead to lower back pain and may be even accompanied by scoliosis, neurological dysfunction and other complications, which will affect the daily activities and life quality of patients. Vertebral augmentation is an effective treatment method for OVCF, but it cannot correct unbalance of bone metabolism or improve the osteoporotic status, causing complications like lower back pain, limited spinal activities and vertebral refracture. The post-operative systematic and standardized rehabilitation treatments can improve curative effect and therapeutic efficacy of anti-osteoporosis, reduce risk of vertebral refracture, increase patient compliance and improve quality of life. Since there still lack relevant clinical treatment guidelines for postoperative rehabilitation treatments following vertebral augmentation for OVCF, the current treatments are varied with uneven therapeutic effect. In order to standardize the postoperative rehabilitation treatment, the Spine Trauma Group of the Orthopedic Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized relevant experts to refer to relevant literature and develop the "Guideline for postoperative rehabilitation treatment following vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (2022 version)" based on the clinical guidelines published by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) as well as on the principles of scientificity, practicality and advancement. The guideline provided evidence-based recommendations on 10 important issues related to postoperative rehabilitation treatments of OVCF.
What are risk factors for subsequent fracture after vertebral augmentation in patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Zhi Chen,Chenyang Song,Min Chen,Hongxiang Li,Yusong Ye,Wenge Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04946-7

IF: 2.562

2021-12-01

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Abstract Background Due to its unique mechanical characteristics, the incidence of subsequent fracture after vertebral augmentation is higher in thoracolumbar segment, but the causes have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to comprehensively explore the potential risk factors for subsequent fracture in this region. Methods Patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture in thoracolumbar segment who received vertebral augmentation from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into refracture group and non-refracture group according to the occurrence of refracture. The clinical information, imaging findings (cement distribution, spine sagittal parameters, degree of paraspinal muscle degeneration) and surgery related indicators of the included patients were collected and compared. Results A total of 109 patients were included, 13 patients in refracture group and 96 patients in non-refracture group. Univariate analysis revealed a significantly higher incidence of previous fracture, intravertebral cleft (IVC) and cement leakage, greater fatty infiltration of psoas (FI PS ), fatty infiltration of erector spinae plus multifidus (FI ES + MF ), correction of body angle (BA), BA restoration rate and vertebral height restoration rate in refracture group. Further binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated previous fracture, IVC, FI PS and BA restoration rate were independent risk factors for subsequent fracture. According to ROC curve analysis, the prediction accuracy of BA restoration rate was the highest (area under the curve was 0.794), and the threshold value was 0.350. Conclusions Subsequent fracture might cause by the interplay of multiple risk factors. The previous fracture, IVC, FI PS and BA restoration rate were identified as independent risk factors. When the BA restoration rate exceeded 0.350, refractures were more likely to occur.

orthopedics,rheumatology
Innovative minimally invasive implants for osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures

Yi Luo,Da-Mei Yang,Hong-Mei Yang,Di Wu,Feng-Ying Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1161174

IF: 3.9

2023-03-20

Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract:With increasing population aging, osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), resulting in severe back pain and functional impairment, have become progressively common. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) as minimally invasive procedures have revolutionized OVCFs treatment. However, PVP- and PKP-related complications, such as symptomatic cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures, continue to plague physicians. Consequently, progressively more implants for OVCFs have been developed recently to overcome the shortcomings of traditional procedures. Therefore, we conducted a literature review on several new implants for OVCFs, including StaXx FX, Vertebral Body Stenting, Vesselplasty, Sky Bone Expander, Kiva, Spine Jack, Osseofix, Optimesh, Jack, and V-strut. Additionally, this review highlights the individualized applications of these implants for OVCFs. Nevertheless, current clinical studies on these innovative implants remain limited. Future prospective, randomized, and controlled studies are needed to elucidate the effectiveness and indications of these new implants for OVCFs.

medicine, general & internal
The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis

Vratko Himič,Nikolaos Syrmos,Gianfranco K I Ligarotti,So Kato,Michael G Fehlings,Mario Ganau,Gianfranco K. I. Ligarotti,Michael G. Fehlings

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-513

2023-10-31

Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Abstract:Osteoporosis predisposes patients to spinal fragility fractures. Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and prognostication of these osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF). However, the current imaging knowledge base for OVF is lacking sufficient standardisation to enable effective risk prognostication. OVF have been shown to be more prevalent in Caucasian patient cohorts in comparison to the Eastern Asian population. These population-based differences in risk for developing OVF suggest that there could be genetic and epigenetic factors that drive the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, low bone mineral density (BMD) and OVF. Several genetic loci have been associated with a higher vertebral fracture risk, although at varying degrees of significance. The present challenge is clarifying whether these associations are specific to vertebral fractures or osteoporosis more generally. Furthermore, these factors could be exploited for diagnostic interpretation as biomarkers [including novel long non-coding (lnc)RNAs, micro (mi)RNAs and circular (circ)RNAs]. The extent of methylation of genes, alongside post-translational histone modifications, have shown to affect several interlinked pathways that converge on the regulation of bone deposition and resorption, partially through their influence on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Lastly, in addition to biomarkers, several exciting new imaging modalities could add to the established dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method used for BMD assessment. New technologies, and novel sequences within existing imaging modalities, may be able to quantify the quality of bone in addition to the BMD and bone structure; these are making progress through various stages of development from the pre-clinical sphere through to deployment in the clinical setting. In this mini review, we explore the literature to clarify the genetic and epigenetic factors associated with spinal fragility fractures and delineate the causal genes, pathways and interactions which could drive different risk profiles. We also outline the cutting-edge imaging modalities which could transform diagnostic protocols for OVF.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Review Update 2022

Hae-Dong Jang,Eung-Ha Kim,Jae Chul Lee,Sung-Woo Choi,Hak Soo Kim,Joong-Suk Cha,Byung-Joon Shin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2022.0441

2022-12-31

Asian Spine Journal

Abstract:A vertebral fracture is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) cause a variety of morbidities and deaths. There are currently few “gold standard treatments” outlined for the management of OVFs in terms of quantity and quality. Conservative treatment is the primary treatment option for OVFs. The treatment of pain includes short-term bed rest, analgesic medication, anti-osteoporotic medications, exercise, and a brace. Numerous reports have been made on studies for vertebral augmentation (VA), including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. There is still debate and controversy about the effectiveness of VA in comparison with conservative treatment. Until more robust data are available, current evidence does not support the routine use of VA for OVF. Despite the fact that the majority of OVFs heal without surgery, 15%–35% of patients with an unstable fracture, persistent intractable back pain, or severely collapsed vertebra that causes a neurologic deficit, kyphosis, or chronic pseudarthrosis frequently require surgery. Because no single approach can guarantee the best surgical outcomes, customized surgical techniques are required. Surgeons must stay current on developments in the osteoporotic spine field and be open to new treatment options. Osteoporosis management and prevention are critical to lowering the risk of future OVFs. Clinical studies on bisphosphonate’s effects on fracture healing are lacking. Teriparatide was intermittently administered, which dramatically improved spinal fusion and fracture healing while lowering mortality risk. According to the available literature, there are no standard management methods for OVFs. More multimodal approaches, including conservative and surgical treatment, VA, and medications that treat osteoporosis and promote fracture healing, are required to improve the quality of the majority of guidelines.
Synthetic Bone Substitutes and Mechanical Devices for the Augmentation of Osteoporotic Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

Giuseppe Marongiu,Marco Verona,Gaia Cardoni,Antonio Capone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb11020029

2020-05-05

Journal of Functional Biomaterials

Abstract:Background: Different augmentation techniques have been described in the literature in addition to the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the use of cements, bone substitutes, and other devices for the augmentation of proximal humeral fractures. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by using PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, Scopus/EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases according the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines over the years 1966 to 2019. The search term “humeral fracture proximal” was combined with “augmentation”; “polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA”; “cement”; “bone substitutes”; “hydroxyapatite”; “calcium phosphates”; “calcium sulfate”; “cell therapies”, and “tissue engineering” to find the literature relevant to the topic under review. Results: A total of 10 clinical studies considered eligible for the review, with a total of 308 patients, were included. Mean age at the time of injury was 68.8 years (range of 58–92). The most commonly described techniques were reinforcing the screw–bone interface with bone PMMA cement (three studies), filling the metaphyseal void with synthetic bone substitutes (five studies), and enhancing structural support with metallic devices (two studies). Conclusion: PMMA cementation could improve screw-tip fixation. Calcium phosphate and calcium sulfate injectable composites provided good biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and lower mechanical failure rate when compared to non-augmented fractures. Mechanical devices currently have a limited role. However, the available evidence is provided mainly by level III to IV studies, and none of the proposed techniques have been sufficiently studied.
Enhancing Osteoporosis Management: A Thorough Examination of Surgical Techniques and Their Effects on Patient Outcomes

Mihnea Popa,Adrian Cursaru,Bogdan Cretu,Sergiu Iordache,Georgian L Iacobescu,Razvan Spiridonica,Bogdan Serban,Catalin Cirstoiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59681

2024-05-05

Cureus

Abstract:Managing osteoporotic fractures in older individuals is a difficult task in orthopedic surgery. It requires a careful approach that combines advanced diagnostic methods, customized surgical treatments, and comprehensive rehabilitation strategies. This article presents the results of an analysis carried out at the University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest. The analysis specifically examines the treatment of osteoporotic fractures using different osteosynthesis techniques. Although diagnostic tools like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) have improved, a considerable number of fractures still happen in people who do not have obvious osteoporosis. This emphasizes the importance of using additional diagnostic measures such as high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) to improve the accuracy of predictions. The study demonstrates the intricate nature of surgical decision-making and the significance of adjusting techniques to meet the specific needs of each patient. An instance of osteosynthesis failure resulting from the inappropriate choice of method highlighted the crucial significance of a thorough preoperative assessment. The discussion highlights the importance of early mobilization and rehabilitation in reducing the risks associated with prolonged immobilization and improving patient recovery. This paper strongly supports the use of evidence-based and patient-centered methods in the management of osteoporotic fractures. It emphasizes the importance of utilizing the most recent advancements in diagnostic and surgical technologies. Promising advancements in orthopedic medicine lie in the future, particularly in the integration of interdisciplinary research and personalized medicine. These advancements have the potential to enhance patient outcomes in this population that is at high risk.
Risk factors for secondary vertebral compression fracture after percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a single-centre retrospective study

Jin Tang,Siyu Wang,Jianing Wang,Xiaokun Wang,Tao Li,Lulu Cheng,Jinfeng Hu,Wei Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05290-x

IF: 2.6

2024-11-28

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Abstract:To determine the incidence of secondary vertebral compression fracture (SVCF) after percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) and its correlative risk factors, and to provide theoretical evidence for clinical practice.

orthopedics
Current Status and Future Trends of Minimally Invasive Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Tengjiao Zhu,Yun Tian,Fang Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2015.12.019

2015-01-01

Abstract:[Summary] With the increasing global aging population, osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture ( OVCF) is getting more attention as a big challenge for orthopedic surgeons.Current therapeutic options include conservative treatment, traditional open reduction and internal fixation, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP).Due to excellent clinical results on pain relief and function improvement, PVP and PKP, as minimally invasive surgical techniques, now increasingly become more popular for painful OVCF.The review focused on a brief introduction of the current status of the two procedures and a discussion of the future trends of the two techniques.

[Can a sensitizer potency be attenuated?].

Changes of the Adjacent Discs and Vertebrae in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Treated with or Without Bone Cement Augmentation

[Augmentation techniques for the treatment of osteoporosis-associated fractures of the extremities]

Tips and tricks for using cement augmentation of pedicle screws and vertebral body replacements-A literature review supported by two case reports

[MODIFICATIONS OF CURARIZATION AFTER INTRA-ARTERIAL INJECTION OF THE LEG WITH ANP 235].

An Outline on the Advancements in Surgical Management of Osteoporosis-Associated Fractures

Assessment of clinical, imaging, surgical risk factors for subsequent fracture following vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic patients

Vertebral compression fractures: pain relief, progression and new fracture rate comparing vertebral augmentation with brace

[Translated article] Management of spinal deformities caused by osteoporotic vertebral fractures

The incidence of secondary vertebral fracture of vertebral augmentation techniques versus conservative treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Managements of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A narrative review

[Artículo traducido] Abordaje del adulto mayor con fractura vertebral por fragilidad ósea

Guideline for postoperative rehabilitation treatment following vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (version 2022)

What are risk factors for subsequent fracture after vertebral augmentation in patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Innovative minimally invasive implants for osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures

The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis

Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Review Update 2022

Synthetic Bone Substitutes and Mechanical Devices for the Augmentation of Osteoporotic Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

Enhancing Osteoporosis Management: A Thorough Examination of Surgical Techniques and Their Effects on Patient Outcomes

Risk factors for secondary vertebral compression fracture after percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a single-centre retrospective study

Current Status and Future Trends of Minimally Invasive Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures