Bone Cements Used in Vertebral Augmentation: A State-of-the-art Narrative Review
Tyree Williams,Talia Adler,Lindsey Smokoff,Anmoldeep Kaur,Benjamin Rodriguez,Kavita Prakash,Edib Redzematovic,Turner Baker,Benjamin Rapoport,Edward Yoon,Douglas Beall,Jonathan Dordick,Reade De Leacy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s437827
IF: 2.8319
2024-03-13
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Tyree D Williams, 1– 3 Talia Adler, 2, 4 Lindsey Smokoff, 2, 4 Anmoldeep Kaur, 2, 5 Benjamin Rodriguez, 2, 3, 6 Kavita Jyoti Prakash, 6 Edib Redzematovic, 2 Turner S Baker, 2, 3, 7 Benjamin I Rapoport, 2, 3 Edward S Yoon, 8 Douglas P Beall, 9 Jonathan S Dordick, 1 Reade A De Leacy 3 1 Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA; 2 Sinai BioDesign, Mount Sinai Medical System, New York, NY, USA; 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Medical System, New York, NY, USA; 4 Columbia University School of General Studies, New York, NY, USA; 5 Department of Neuroscience, Smith College, Northampton, MA, USA; 6 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 7 Department of Population Health Science & Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 8 Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; 9 Spine Fracture Institute, Oklahoma City, OK, USA Correspondence: Benjamin Rodriguez, Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Medical System, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1136, New York, NY, USA, Tel +1 615 524-0211, Email Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are common in osteoporotic patients, with a frequency projected to increase alongside a growing geriatric population. VCFs often result in debilitating back pain and decreased mobility. Cement augmentation, a minimally invasive surgical technique, is widely used to stabilize fractures and restore vertebral height. Acrylic-based cements and calcium phosphate cements are currently the two primary fill materials utilized for these procedures. Despite their effectiveness, acrylic bone cements and calcium phosphate cements have been associated with various intraoperative and postoperative incidents impacting VCF treatment. Over the past decade, discoveries in the field of biomedical engineering and material science have shown advancements toward addressing these limitations. This narrative review aims to assess the potential pitfalls and barriers of the various types of bone cements. Keywords: osteoporosis, vertebral compression fractures, bone cement, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, vertebral augmentation Over one million cases of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) occur annually in the United States and remain the most common fragility fracture in osteoporotic patients. 1 The two most common treatments for VCFs are vertebroplasty, in which injectable bone cement (BC) is administered into the affected vertebrae, and vertebral augmentation with balloon kyphoplasty (BK), where a non-compliant balloon tamp is placed within the affected vertebrae to normalize the vertebral height as much as possible prior to cementing. The primary goals of vertebral augmentation (VA) are vertebral anatomy restoration and optimal fracture stabilization. Cement leakage is the most prevalent procedural adverse event associated with VA. 2 The vast majority of cement extravasations are clinically silent and of no consequence. However, in rare circumstances, it has been associated with serious adverse events. Acrylic bone cements (ABCs) and calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) are sensitive to some extrinsic factors, which influence handling properties resulting in inconsistent mechanical properties following cement setting. 3,4 ABCs have been linked with local tissue necrosis during polymerization, and they are typically classified as non-biomimetic. 5,6 CPCs provide an opportunity to establish bone regeneration by increasing osteoconductivity and drug or growth factor encapsulation. However, these cements struggle with high rates of cytotoxicity, excessive cost, and poor mechanical properties. 4 There is a clear opportunity for further development and improvement of CPCs. To the authors' knowledge, the most recent, comprehensive review regarding ABCs was published by Gladius Lewis in 1997. 7 In light of advancements in the field, a current extensive review evaluating ABCs and CPCs was thought to be needed. A review of bone cements was last published by Yousefi et al in 2019, but only evaluated a limited number of ABCs and CPCs and did not comprehensively examine novel formulations. 7 This paper aims to examine the properties and characteristics associated with both types of bone cements and address them by investigating new alternative formulas that limit the adverse effects most commonly associated with commercially available bone cements used for treating painful VCFs. A search was conducted utilizing PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect with terms su -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology