Evaluation of Co-Curricular Learning and the Influence of Student Choice

Victoria L Williams,Mira Haddad,Katherine Kelley,Junan Li,Jennifer L Rodis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101257

2024-08-08

Abstract:Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate student choice of activities and perception of co-curricular program. Attitude and skill development as well as areas for program improvement were also assessed. Methods: Data were evaluated from two sources: 1) Student Survey administered to all PharmD students to determine student perceptions of the co-curricular program as well as barriers to success, 2) Student Activity Reporting data from post experience submissions to evaluate the co-curricular program. Data were stratified by student demographics to identify trends. Comparison of data was conducted from both sources on student perception of learning. Results: Data for 405 students were available for analysis. The highest preference overall from students for hosts of activities were professional student organizations; the highest preference of location was online, asynchronous. The most meaningful benefits were learning information about a new subject (n=258; 63.7%), ability to extend learning from the classroom to real life (n=247; 61%), and networking opportunities (n=218; 53.8%). Top barriers for completion of the program included scheduling challenges (n=296; 73.1%), lack of time (n=249; 61.5%), and lack of interest (n=187; 46.2%). Subpopulations identified different benefits and barriers to completion. Conclusion: Students have overall positive perceptions of the co-curricular program and its value for skill development. Findings were applied to adjust the co-curricular program at the institution, including a reduction in total hours required. Continuous evaluation of co-curricular programs is important to optimize student learning and address curricular overload.