vances Nerve Conduits for Nerve Repair or Reconstruction

D. Deal,M. Hogan
Abstract:Advances in treating peripheral nerve lesions have resulted frorn research in nerve regeneration and the use biomaterials as well as synthetic materials. VVhen direct tensionless'repair of peripheral ' nerve lesions is not possible, nerve conduits may be used to bridge digital sensory nerve gaps of cm. Nerve autograft is the benchrnark for larger, longer, mixed, or motor nerve clefects. Biologie, autogenous conduits---typically veins or, rarely, arteries—have dernonstrated their'utility in nerve gaps <3 cm in,: length. Tliree types of bioabsorbable Concluit have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, constructed of collagen; polydlycolic acid, or caprolactone. ,Caprólactone conduits have been found to be equivalent in reáults to autograft. Collagen' conduits are next best, and pólyglycolic acid conduits are functionally iriferior. Further research and prospective, multicenter, ' large-scale trials are needed to help establish the role of synthetic, bidabsorbable conduits in peripheral nerve reconStruction. D. Nicole Deal, MD Jus tin W. Griffin, MD MaCalus V. Hogan, MD From the Departrnent o Orthopaedic Surgery, Ufniversity Virginie, Charlottesville ' VA Dr. Deal or ao member serves as eaujote TamilY o °f wth n el; Vi °r ffi gci nei oOrthopaedic rc°rn mitt a" rde member, Dr. Hogen or en immediate Sfaorn cil i elytY" member serves as a board member, owner, officer America r c°rnmittee member of the Orthopaedic SunrAgecoan dsemanYdot fhe J. Robert Gladden Orthopaedic Society. Neither Dr. Griffin nor any immediate family member has received anything of value from or owns stock ic a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject o this article. J Am Acad °ƒ1hoP Surg 2012;20: 63-68 Copyright 2012 bY Me American Acaderny iof Orthopaedic Surgeons. Complex and technically demanding to manage, segmental nerve defects pose a challenge for even the most skilled surgeon. Tension-free repair of nerve lacerations is the optimal surg,ical treatment. When tensionless direct repair cannot be achieved, interposed nerve autograft is the benchmark.1 However, nerve autograft results in increased surgical time and donor site morbidity, thereby justifying the search for better options. Table 1 lists the current options for bridging nerve gaps. Nonneural, hollow, tubular interposition substitutes known as nerve conduits include autogenous vein or artery grafts and synthetic tubes. Sometimes these conduits are referred to as nerve guides. Although the use of acellular cadaver nerve allog,rafts is also increasing, clinical studies are limited. Here, we review the use of hollow, tubular nerve conduits as a method for reconstructing nerve gaps.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?