Abstract:Background Coercive measures have been applied in mental health fields throughout history, denying people with mental illness the ability to decide, even though there is increasing evidence that these measures bring few benefits to these individuals. Objective The objective of this study was to analyse the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics most likely associated with the use of mechanical restraints (MRs) in psychiatric hospital settings. Design, Settings and Participants This was a descriptive, comparative and analytical cross‐sectional study in people with mental disorders who were hospitalized in two hospitals in the Autonomous Valencian Community (Spain). We included a total of 91 participants who completed the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Barrat's Impulsiveness Scale and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Results The results we collected indicated that the patients most likely to be mechanically restrained were younger people with less awareness of their symptoms and disease, previous admissions to a psychiatric hospital and cohabitation with parents and/or family. In addition, having been admitted involuntarily, previously having had MRs applied, presenting more positive psychotic symptoms and habitual caffeine consumption all predicted the use of MRs. Conclusions The variables that were able to predict MR were involuntary admission, previous use of MR, the presence of positive psychotic symptoms and caffeine consumption. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care Evaluation of the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients can help health professionals, especially nurses, to recognize patients who are at risk of requiring MR. This allows mental health practitioners to take these factors into account during interventions or when implementing programmes designed to reduce the use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospital settings. Impact What problem did the study address? Coercive measures have been applied in mental health fields throughout history, with no benefits to these patients. What were the main findings? There are studies that relate some variables to MR in psychiatric settings, but we have been able to find variables capable of predicting MR such as involuntary admission, previous use of MR, the presence of positive psychotic symptoms and caffeine consumption. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The findings of this study allow for the reduction of MRs in psychiatric units. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics found to be related to MR will help professionals identify when a patient is admitted in order to use specific interventions aimed at preventing the use of MRs during admission. This is the first study to indicate a relationship between caffeine consumption and the use of MRs. Further studies will be necessary to verify if controlled caffeine supplementation during admission to psychiatric units could become an additional strategy contributing to preventing the application of MR specifically in individuals who habitually consume coffee or caffeine‐containing beverages daily. Reporting Method We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines using the STROBE reporting method. Patient Contribution No patient or public contribution.

Prevalence of use of physical restraints in pediatric intensive care units and correlated variables: A Spanish multicenter study

Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Physical Restraints in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Physical Restraint Use in Intensive Care Units: Exploring the Decision-Making Process and New Proposals. A Multimethod Study

Prevalence and variation of physical restraint use in acute care settings in the US

The Use of Physical Restraints in Italian Intensive Care Units: Results From a Multicenter Observational Study

Adaptation and validation of the Physical Restraint‐Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire to the paediatric context

An integrative review on physical restraint in adult critical care unit

“Patient Comfort Can Be Sacrificed for Patient Safety”—Perception and Practice Reported by Critical Care Nurses Toward Physical Restraints: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

Physical restraint intervention in the intensive care unit: An observational pilot study

Assessment of Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Physical Restraint: A Scoping Review

Relationship of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to mechanical restraint used in a psychiatric hospital in Spain

Nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding the use of physical restraints in children in the intensive care setting in China: A cross-sectional multicentre study

A systematic mapping review identifying key features of restraint research in inpatient pediatric psychiatry: A human rights perspective

Interprofessional intensive care unit (ICU) team perspectives on physical restraint practices and minimization strategies in an adult ICU: A qualitative study of contextual influences

Prevalence and variability of restrictive care practice use (physical restraint, seclusion and chemical restraint) in adult mental health inpatient settings: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Adverse events related to physical restraint use in intensive care units: A review of the literature

Nurses' knowledge and practices of physical restraints in intensive care units: An observational study

The Current Status and Analysis of Physical Restraint Usage in Intensive Care Unit

Physical Restraint Use in Hospitalized Patients: A Study of Routinely Collected Health Records Data

Assessment of nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practice in the application of measures of physical restraint of patients

[Institutional and patient-related factors influencing the frequency of restraint in a general psychiatric acute care unit]