Tubular cryocoagulation: instrumentation for "no touch" melanoma enucleation and 360 degrees scleral buckling.

R. Wilson

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Physical Restraints in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Nianqi Cui,Hui Zhang,Sijie Gan,Yuping Zhang,Dandan Chen,Pingping Guo,Jingjie Wu,Zhuang Li,Jingfen Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s408919

2023-01-01

Risk Management and Healthcare Policy

Abstract:Purpose Physical restraints are used routinely in intensive care units (ICUs) and have negative effects. It is critical to identify the impact factors of physical restraints on critically ill patients. The present study investigated the prevalence of physical restraints and impact factors associated with their use in a large cohort of critically ill patients over one year. Patients and Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed in multiple ICUs at a tertiary hospital in China in 2019 using observational data from electronic medical records. The data consisted of demographics and clinical variables. Logistic regression was used to assess the independent impact factors for the use of physical restraint. Results The analysis consisted of 3776 critically ill patients with a prevalence of physical restraint use of 48.8%. The logistic regression analysis indicated that physical restraint use was associated with independent risk factors, including surgical ICU admission, pain, tracheal tube placement, and abdominal drainage tube placement. Physical restraint use was associated with independent protective factors, including male sex, light sedation, muscle strength, and ICU length of stay. Conclusion The prevalence of physical restraint use in critically ill patients was high. Tracheal tubes, surgical ICU, pain, abdominal drainage tubes, light sedation, and muscle strength were independent variables associated with the use of physical restraint. These results will assist health professionals in identifying high-risk physical restraint patients based on their impact factors. Early removal of the tracheal tube and abdominal drainage tube, pain relief, light sedation, and improvements in muscle strength may help reduce the use of physical restraints.
The Effect of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Physical Restraint Reduction in Intensive Care Units: a Protocol for an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.

Nianqi Cui,Dandan Chen,Yuping Zhang,Hui Zhang,Xiaowei He,Chuanqi Ding,Jingfen Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-626

2021-01-01

Annals of Palliative Medicine

Abstract:BACKGROUND:As the last resort in intensive care units, physical restraint reduction is affected by various interventions. Several non-pharmacological interventions may directly reduce physical restraints, such as staff education, or indirectly reduce physical restraint, such as delirium prevention; however, their effectiveness has remained inconclusive. Therefore, we devised a protocol for umbrella reviews to summarize the evidence integrating data of different non-pharmacological interventions that may reduce physical restraint use.METHODS:The umbrella review will be conducted following the methodology formulated by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Electronic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Psyc Articles, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), JBISRIS (JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, for Chinese literature), SinoMed (for Chinese literature), and WANFANG DATA (for Chinese literature), will be searched to identify articles published from January 2016 to December 2020. A systematic review and meta-analysis quality will be critically assessed by AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews). According to the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) guidelines, the evidence quality of each intervention will be assessed. Overlapping studies and the excess significance test will be performed to assess whether previous evidences are bias.DISCUSSION:This protocol was devised according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Umbrella reviews will be an excellent supplement to the evidence of the guideline adaptation and provide a broader picture of non-pharmacological interventions that may reduce the use of physical restraint, which can provide critical care nurses in intensive care units with the evidence they need.TRIAL REGISTRATION:This umbrella review protocol was documented in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42021242586).
“Patient Comfort Can Be Sacrificed for Patient Safety”—Perception and Practice Reported by Critical Care Nurses Toward Physical Restraints: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

Nianqi Cui,Ruolin Qiu,Yuping Zhang,Jingfen Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.573601

IF: 3.9

2021-01-01

Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract:Aim: The aim of the study was to explore the perception and practice of physical restraints used by critical care nurses.Design: A qualitative descriptive design was used.Method: From December 2019 to May 2020, a one-to-one, semi-structured in-depth interview with 10 critical care nurses from two intensive care units in a tertiary general hospital with 3,200 beds in China was conducted using the method of purposeful sampling. The data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.Findings: The perception of physical restraints among critical care nurses was that patient comfort can be sacrificed for patient safety. Physical restraints protected patient safety by preventing patients from unplanned extubation but influenced patient comfort. Physical restraints were common practice of critical care nurses. Relative physical restraints provided patients with more freedom of movement and rationalization of physical restraints which were the practical strategies.Conclusion: The study identified problems in critical care nurses' perception and practice on physical restraints. Critical care nurses are confident that physical restraints can protect patient safety, and the influence of physical restraints on patient comfort is just like the side effect. Although physical restraints were common practice, critical care nurses still faced dilemmas in the implementation of physical restraints. Relative physical restraints and rationalization of physical restraints help critical care nurses cope with the “bad feelings,” which may also be the cause of unplanned extubation. It is necessary for the adaptation of clinical practice guidelines about physical restraints for critically ill patients in the Chinese context, to change the perception and practice of critical care nurses and deliver safe and high-quality patient care.
Role of tumor necrosis factor on toxicity and cytokine production after isolated hepatic perfusion.

T. Lans,David L. Bartlett,S. Libutti,Michael F. X. Gnant,D. Liewehr,David Venzon,E. Turner,H. Alexander

IF: 13.801

2001-04-01

Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract:PURPOSE Isolated limb or liver perfusion with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and melphalan results in regression of advanced cancers in the majority of treated patients. However, the contribution of TNF to the efficacy of isolation perfusion with melphalan has not been demonstrated conclusively in random assignment trials. Furthermore, TNF is an inflammatory cytokine and may be associated with significant systemic and regional toxicity. This study was conducted to characterize the toxicity and secondary cytokine production attributable to TNF by comparing these parameters in patients undergoing isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) using melphalan with or without TNF. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Thirty-two patients with unresectable colorectal cancer confined to the liver underwent a 60-min hyperthermic IHP using 1.5 mg/kg melphalan alone (n = 17) or with 1.0 mg of TNF (n = 15) with inflow via the gastroduodenal artery and outflow via an isolated segment of inferior vena cava. Complete vascular isolation was confirmed using the I-131 radiolabeled albumin-monitoring technique. Post-IHP parameters of hepatic and systemic toxicity and cytokine levels [TNF, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8] in perfusate and serum were measured. RESULTS Levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in perfusate at the end of the 60-min IHP were significantly higher in TNF-treated patients (P < or = 0.001). Peak systemic IL-6 and IL-8 levels post-IHP were also significantly higher in TNF-treated compared with non-TNF-treated patients (P < 0.0001) by 28- and 268-fold, respectively. The peak levels of these cytokines were associated with significantly lower systolic blood pressure and higher heart rate and mean pulmonary artery blood pressure in TNF-treated patients during the first 48 h post-IHP (P < or = 0.03). Serum bilirubin levels were significantly higher (P = 0.017) and platelets lower (P = 0.03) in TNF-treated compared with non-TNF-treated patients. However, elevations in aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase were not significantly different between groups and returned toward baseline within 1 week after IHP. CONCLUSIONS Addition of TNF to melphalan during IHP results in significant differences in post-IHP production of IL-6 and IL-8 with associated changes in mean arterial blood pressure and greater regional toxicity, as reflected in higher levels of serum bilirubin. However, these measurable differences were transient and did not appear to be of major clinical consequence. Prior to its routine use, the benefit of TNF in isolation perfusion should be demonstrated in random assignment trials.
Adverse events related to physical restraint use in intensive care units: A review of the literature

Sebastian Berger,Pascale Grzonka,Simon A Amacher,Sabina Hunziker,Anja I Frei,Raoul Sutter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2023.11.005

2023-12-27

Abstract:Physical restraints are widely used and accepted as protective measures during treatment in intensive care unit (ICU). This review of the literature summarizes the adverse events and outcomes associated with physical restraint use, and the risk factors associated with their use during treatment in the ICU. The PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were screened using predefined search terms to identify studies pertaining to adverse events and/or outcomes associated with physical restraint use, and the factors associated with their use in adult patients admitted to the ICU. A total of 24 articles (including 6126 patients) that were published between 2006 and 2022 were identified. The described adverse events associated with physical restraint use included skin injuries, subsequent delirium, neurofunctional impairment, and a higher rate of post-traumatic stress disorder. Subsequent delirium was the most frequent adverse event to be reported. No alternative measures to physical restraints were discussed, and only one study reported a standardized protocol for their use. Although physical restraint use has been reported to be associated with adverse events (including neurofunctional impairment) in the literature, the available evidence is limited. Although causality cannot be confirmed, a definite association appears to exist. Our findings suggest that it is essential to improve awareness regarding their adverse impact and optimize approaches for their detection, management, and prevention using protocols or checklists.
Prevalence and variation of physical restraint use in acute care settings in the US

Ann F Minnick,Lorraine C Mion,Mary E Johnson,Cathy Catrambone,Rosanne Leipzig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00140.x

Abstract:Purpose: To describe physical restraint (PR) rates and contexts in U.S. hospitals. Design: This 2003-2005 descriptive study was done to measure PR prevalence and contexts (census, gender, age, ventilation status, PR type, and rationale) at 40 randomly selected acute care hospitals in six U.S. metropolitan areas. All units except psychiatric, emergency, operative, obstetric, and long-term care were included. Methods: On 18 randomly selected days between 0500 and 0700 (5:00 am and 7:00 am), data collectors determined PR use and contexts via observation and nurse report. Findings: PR prevalence was 50 per 1,000 patient days (based on 155,412 patient days). Preventing disruption of therapy was the chief reason cited. PR rates varied by unit type, with adult ICU rates the highest obtained. Intra- and interinstitutional variation was as high as 10-fold. Ventilator use was strongly associated with PR use. Elderly patients were over-represented among the physically restrained on some units (e.g., medical) but on many unit types (including most ICUs) their PR use was consistent with those of other adults. Conclusions: Wide rate variation indicates the need to examine administratively mediated variables and the promotion of unit-based improvement efforts. Anesthetic and sedation practices have contributed to high variation in ICU PR rates. Determining the types of units to target to achieve improvements in care of older adults requires study of PR sequelae rate by unit type.
Physical restraint intervention in the intensive care unit: An observational pilot study

Gülendam Hakverdioğlu Yönt,Süreyya Bulut,Maria Müller‐Staub,Hüseyin Kizilirmak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12468

IF: 1.15

2024-05-10

International Journal of Nursing Knowledge

Abstract:Purpose Physical restraint (PR) is applied for patients' safety and to prevent the removal of inserted devices. No matter how well applied, PR causes undesired effects and discomfort to patients. Because PR‐Guidelines are not yet implemented in Turkey, an observational study was performed to get baseline data on the type and number of PR‐activities and on patients' complications in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods An observational pilot study was conducted in anesthesia and reanimation adult ICUs in a midsized general hospital in Turkey. Included were 31 patients and two data collection tools: a basic form (patient demographics, medical information, and complications) and a PR observation guide on nurses' PR‐activities. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, and mean and standard deviation) were used for data evaluation. Findings Most patients (61.3%) were male, and 74.2% were aged 60–79 years. Almost a third was unconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale <9) and at risk for falling. Of the total 33 activities of the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), 13 were never applied in 33% of patients. The most applied activity was "provide sufficient staff to assist with the safe application of physical restraining devices or manual restraints" (96.8%). Least applied were "explain inpatient and significant others the behaviors necessary for the termination of the intervention," "Provide the dependent patient with a means of summoning help" (6.5%), and "Teach family the risks and benefits of restraint reduction" (3.2%). Overall, 58.1% of patients had PR complications. Conclusions For the first time, PR NIC activities were evaluated in a Turkish ICU. Findings show low performance of NIC activities and a high complication rate. Implications for nursing practice The findings provide the basis to implement a PR‐Guideline in Turkish ICUs to enhance patients' safety and comfort.

nursing
Protocol for the Adaptation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Physical Restraints in Critically Ill Patients

Nianqi Cui,Yuping Zhang,Yuanfei Liu,Yingfeng Zhou,Hong Sun,Jingfen Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-20-2133

2021-01-01

Annals of Palliative Medicine

Abstract:BACKGROUND The effectiveness of physical restraints (PRs) in the prevention of unplanned extubation has been increasingly questioned, and several countries have developed clinical practice guidelines for reducing the use of PRs. However, some countries, including China, have failed to establish their guidelines, and the adaptation of existing guidelines to local circumstances may be an attractive alternative. METHODS Following the guideline definition of Institute of Medicine, the guideline will be adapted following the CAN-IMPLEMENT©. Guideline scope and clinical questions will be established based on an integrative review, retrospective study, and stakeholder interviews. The guideline's quality will be assessed by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II and Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence. A systematic review and meta-analysis will be evaluated by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews. The guidelines will meet the criteria of the RIGHT-Ad@ pt Checklist. DISCUSSION This study describes the proposed protocol for adapting clinical practice guidelines on PRs in critically ill patients. We believe the guideline will help health professionals, especially critical care nurses, deliver safe, high-quality patient care by reducing the implementation of PRs in China. GUIDELINE REGISTRATION The guideline has been registered at the International Practice Guidelines Registry Platform (http://www.guidelinesregistry.org/). The registration number is IPGRP-2019CN094, registration date 27-Dec-2019.
Predicting Critical Care Nurses' Intention to Use Physical Restraints in Intubated Patients: A Structural Equation Model

Yajun Ma,Nianqi Cui,Xiaoli Li,Jiayi Li,Yuping Zhang,Yonggang Liu,Jingfen Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3286312

2023-01-01

Journal of Nursing Management

Abstract:Aims. To identify the factors influencing critical care nurses' intention of physical restraint in intubated patients. Background. Physical restraint reduction has been advocated by many international institutions, nurses are the main physical restraint decision-makers, and it is critical to identify the factors influencing physical restraint intention from nurses' perspective. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted among critical care nurses in China from February 2022 to March 2022. Results. The model showed a good model fit (chi(2)/df = 2.57, RMSEA = 0.07, GFI = 0.94, CFI = 0.89, and AGFI = 0.90). Attitude (beta = 0.29, p < 0.05), subjective norm (beta = 0.25, p < 0.05), and perceived behavioral control (9. 0.32, p < 0.001) directly influenced the intention to use physical restraint in intubated patients. Ethical conflict (9. 0.04, p < 0.05) indirectly influenced the intention. Conclusions. The study revealed that ethical conflict, attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control were positive predictors of physical restraint intention among intubated patients from nurses' perspectives. Implications for Nursing Management. This provides a theoretical perspective to develop effective interventions to reduce physical restraints in critical care settings. Nursing managers should enhance ethical education and physical restraint knowledge and skill training.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of major histocompatibility complex class II genes from inbred chicken lines.

C. Warner,B. Gerndt,Y. Xu,Y. Bourlet,C. Auffray,S. Lamont,A. Nordskog

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2052.1989.TB00862.X

2009-04-24

Animal Genetics

Abstract:High molecular weight DNA was extracted from sperm from chickens of 14 inbred lines. The DNA was digested with each of four restriction enzymes (Pvu II, Hind III, Bgl II, and Bam HI), electrophoresed for 18 or 45 h, blotted onto nitrocellulose, and hybridized to a chicken major histocompatibility complex (MHC, B complex) class II beta-chain probe (beta 2-exon specific). Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) were found with each of the restriction enzymes used. Birds with the same B haplotype always showed the same RFLP pattern; however, some birds of different B haplotypes also shared the same RFLP pattern. To test for the Mendelian inheritance of the RFLP patterns, the F2 progeny of an informative cross were analysed. The RFLP patterns corresponded with the serologically determined B haplotypes of the F2 birds, thereby showing the Mendelian inheritance of the polymorphic bands.
The Current Status and Analysis of Physical Restraint Usage in Intensive Care Unit

CHEN Lu,XI Xing,CHEN Xiangyu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2014.10.006

2014-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To examine physical restraint usage in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods:A retrospective study was conducted among 102 ICU adult patients. A self-designed questionnaire was used including patient’s demographic information, health and treatment characteristics, physical restraint pattern and related nursing records. Results:About 45.7%of the ICU patients received physical restraints. The characteristic of those who were restrained were 41.5%over 65 years old, 13.2%with psychiatric condition, 12.1%with cognitive impairment, 17.2%using sedation, and 75.2%with mechanical ventilation. The main tools were wrist restraints and extremity restraints were mainly applied. Restraints practice with no clear guidelines, unclear indicators and incomplete nursing records were the existing problems. Conclusion:Further studies of physical restraints of ICU patients are needed in order to ifnd the indicators of physical restraints, to establish the clinical decision-making references, to standardize the nursing practice and to develop the standards for physical restraints ifnally.
Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Minimizing Physical Restraints Use in Intensive Care Units: An Umbrella Review

Nianqi Cui,Xiaoli Yan,Yuping Zhang,Dandan Chen,Hui Zhang,Qiong Zheng,Jingfen Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.806945

IF: 3.9

2022-04-27

Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract:Background There is a relationship between the application of physical restraints and negative physiological and psychological effects on critically ill patients. Many organizations have supported and advocated minimizing the use of physical restraints. However, it is still common practice in many countries to apply physical restraints to patients in intensive care. Objective This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of various non-pharmacological interventions used to minimize physical restraints in intensive care units and provide a supplement to the evidence summary for physical restraints guideline adaptation. Methods Based on the methodology of umbrella review, electronic databases, including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo/Psyc Articles/Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, and Wanfang Data, were searched to identify systematic reviews published from January 2016 to December 2020. Two independent reviewers undertook screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was evaluated by AMSTAR 2. Evidence quality of each intervention was assessed according to GRADE. The corrected covered area was calculated as a measure of overlap. Results A total of 47 systematic reviews were included in the umbrella review, of which six were evaluated as high quality, five were of moderate quality, and the rest were of low or critically low quality. The corrected covered area range was from 0.0 to 0.269, which indicated that there was mild overlap between systematic reviews. The included systematic reviews evaluated various types of non-pharmacological interventions for minimizing physical restraints in intensive care units, which included multicomponent interventions involving healthcare professionals' education, family engagement/support, specific consultations and communication, rehabilitation and mobilization (rehabilitation techniques, early mobilization, inspiratory muscle training), interventions related to reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation (weaning modes or protocols, ventilator bundle or cough augmentation techniques, early tracheostomy, high-flow nasal cannula), and management of specific symptoms (delirium, agitation, pain, and sleep disturbances). Conclusion The number of systematic reviews related to physical restraints was limited. Multicomponent interventions involving healthcare professionals' education may be the most direct non-pharmacological intervention for minimizing physical restraints use in intensive care units. However, the quality of evidence was very low, and conclusions should be taken with caution. Policymakers should consider incorporating non-pharmacological interventions related to family engagement/support, specific consultations and communication, rehabilitation and mobilization, interventions related to reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation, and management of specific symptoms as part of the physical restraints minimization bundle. All the evidence contained in the umbrella review provides a supplement to the evidence summary for physical restraints guideline adaptation. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=242586 , identifier: CRD42021242586.

medicine, general & internal
The principles of physical restraint use for hospitalized elderly people: an integrated literature review

Azam Sharifi,Narges Arsalani,Masoud Fallahi-Khoshknab,Farahnaz Mohammadi-Shahbolaghi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01676-8

2021-05-01

Systematic Reviews

Abstract:Abstract Background Physical restraint (PR) is a routine care measure in many hospital wards to ensure patient safety. However, it is associated with many different professional, legal, and ethical challenges. Some guidelines and principles have been developed in some countries for appropriate PR use. The present study aimed to explore the principles of PR use for hospitalized elderly people. Methods This was an integrative review. For data collection, a literature search was conducted in Persian and English databases, namely Magiran, Scientific Information Database (SID), Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed as well as the websites of healthcare organizations and associations. Eligibility criteria were publication in English or Persian between January 1, 2010, and January 1, 2021, and description of the principles of PR use for hospitalized elderly people. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was used for document screening and selection, while the critical appraisal tools of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument were used for quality appraisal. The data were analyzed through constant comparison. Results Primarily, 772 records were retrieved, while only twenty were eligible for the study. The principles of PR use for hospitalized elderly people were categorized into six main categories, namely principles of education for PR use, principles of decision making for PR use, principles of implementing the PR procedure, principles of monitoring patients with PR, principles of PR use documentation, and principles of PR management. Conclusion PR should be used only by trained healthcare providers, with the consent of patient or his/her family members, with standard devices and safe techniques, based on clear guidelines, and under close managerial supervision. Moreover, elderly people with PR should continuously be monitored for any PR-related complications. The findings of the present study can be used for developing clear PR-related guidelines.

medicine, general & internal
Development and Implementation of a Novel Decision Support Tool on Physical Restraint Use in Critically Ill Adult Patients

Xiangping Chen,Yiyu Zhuang,Yuewen Lao,Lijie Qiao,Yueliang Chen,Feng Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12961

2022-01-01

International Journal of Nursing Practice

Abstract:Aim: To investigate whether a novel decision support tool would effectively minimize physical restraint use in critically ill adult patients. Design: A nonequivalent quasi-experimental design combined with a descriptive qualitative approach was used. Methods: A Restraint Decision Tree was developed based on a qualitative study that explored the barriers to employ the Restraint Decision Wheel. During the quasi-experimental study, patients admitted to the unit between October 2017 and March 2018 were enrolled as the control group receiving the Restraint Decision Wheel (n = 528), whereas patients between April 2018 and September 2018 were enrolled as the intervention group receiving the Restraint Decision Tree (n = 564). The physical restraint rate, accidental catheter removal rate and nurses' satisfaction were compared. Results: The Restraint Decision Tree significantly decreased physical restraint use. No significant difference in the rate of accidental catheter removal was found. Nurses reported increased satisfaction with the restraint decision-making. Conclusions: The Restraint Decision Tree could minimize physical restraint use. Physicians' involvement in the restraint decision-making and nurses' competence in delirium assessment may be essential for successful implementation of the Restraint Decision Tree.
Age-related changes in the incorporation of [35S]sulfate into two proteoglycan populations from human cartilage.

G. F. Triphaus,A. Schmidt,E. Buddecke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BCHM2.1980.361.2.1773

Hoppe-Seyler´s Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie

Abstract:From human hyaline cartilage (processus xyphoid) preincubated in the presence of [35S]sulfate, proteoglycans were extracted by 4M guanidinium chloride and divided into 6 age groups. Fractionation of proteoglycans by gel filtration under dissociative conditions resulted in two proteoglycan fractions (a and b) with different hydrodynamic volumes. The higher molecular weight fraction a contained chondroitin sulfate, the fraction b keratan sulfate as predominant glycosaminoglycan, the chondroitin sulfate/keratan sulfate ratio decreasing with increasing age in either fraction. The relative portion of proteoglycan fraction b and its 35S-labelling increased with increasing age. From the specific 35S radioactivities of the chondroitin sulfate and keratan sulfate preparations, the occurrence of two independent proteoglycan populations is suggested. A precursor-product relationship between proteoglycan fraction a and b could be excluded.
Values and Preferences of Health Care Professionals, Policy-Makers, Patients and Family Members Regarding Recommendations of Adapted Physical Restraint Guidelines in Critical Care: A Survey Research

Nianqi Cui,Xiuni Gan,Sufang Huang,Zhe Chu,Dandan Chen,Yuping Zhang,Meijuan Lan,Jingfen Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12955

2023-01-01

Nursing in Critical Care

Abstract:Background: The values and preferences of stakeholders are crucial in the development of guidelines. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate stakeholders' values and preferences regarding draft recommendations for adapted physical restraint guidelines in China. Study design: This survey research was carried out at four university-affiliated comprehensive hospitals based in the eastern, central, western, and north eastern zones of China from January 5-30, 2022. A 48-item self-report questionnaire was distributed, and values and preferences were assessed on a 10-point Likert scale. One-way ANOVA was used to compare values and preference scores among stakeholders. As effect-size measures, partial eta(2) and Cohen's f values are reported for ANOVA results. Results: A total of 1155 stakeholders were enrolled in the study. The mean value and preference scores were higher than seven for 46 draft recommendations. There was either no significant difference in the values and preferences of the stakeholders for the draft recommendations or there was a significant difference (p values ranged from <0.001 similar to.048), but the effect size was small or very small (partial eta(2) value ranged from 0.011 similar to.044; Cohen's f value ranged from 0.101 similar to.214). The mean scores of patients for items related to cyber therapy and early tracheotomy were 6.84 and 6.60, respectively, which were lower than those of family members, policy-makers, and health care professionals and were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The partial eta(2) and Cohen's f values of the effect size were 0.083/0.062 and 0.302/0.256, respectively, which indicated that the differences were moderate. Conclusion: These recommendations were in line with the values and preferences of stakeholders. Patients were more supportive of implementing cyber therapy or hypnosis for pain management but did not support early tracheotomy to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation. Guideline panels could use value and preference information to revise and endorse recommendations of adapted physical restraint guidelines in critical care. Relevance to Clinical Practice: Practitioners should implement recommendations based on the values and preferences of stakeholders.
The Use of Physical Restraints in Italian Intensive Care Units: Results From a Multicenter Observational Study

Elisa Mattiussi,Tommaso Piani,Alice De Marco,Camilla Portolan,Luigi Castriotta,Matteo Danielis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000510

Abstract:Background: The use of physical restraints (PRs) varies across countries and clinical settings, with intensive care units having the highest frequency. Although many investigations on the use of PRs have been conducted worldwide, few studies are reported in the Italian context. Objectives: The aims of this study were to describe PR rates and types and to observe the factors associated with PR use. Methods: In this observational study, 2 methods were used to collect data: direct observation and review of patients' documentations. Results: We performed 328 observations on 146 critically ill patients. Physical restraints were applied in 56.7% (n = 186) of these observations. Bilateral wrist ties were used for most PR episodes (n = 135, 72.6%), followed by unilateral wrist ties (12.9%). The most documented reasons were preventing patients from self-extubation (n = 93, 50.0%) and preserving indwelling lines and tubes (n = 60, 32.2%). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients who were cared for during the night shift were almost 4 times more likely to be restrained than patients in the morning shifts (odds ratio, 3.84; P = .001) and patients with endotracheal tube were 3.5 times more likely to be restricted than spontaneously breathing patients (odds ratio, 3.59; P < .001). Discussions: Physical restraints are commonly used among critically ill patients in Italian intensive care units. There is a need to share the metrics for an efficient and accurate measurement of PR usage and trends and to document the reason for restraints, type of restraints, timeframe, and decision-making criteria.
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings

Ralph Möhler,Tanja Richter,Sascha Köpke,Gabriele Meyer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3

2023-07-28

Abstract:Background: Physical restraints (PR), such as bedrails and belts in chairs or beds, are commonly used for older people receiving long-term care, despite clear evidence for the lack of effectiveness and safety, and widespread recommendations that their use should be avoided. This systematic review of the efficacy and safety of interventions to prevent and reduce the use of physical restraints outside hospital settings, i.e. in care homes and the community, updates our previous review published in 2011. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of interventions to prevent and reduce the use of physical restraints for older people who require long-term care (either at home or in residential care facilities) SEARCH METHODS: We searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's register, MEDLINE (Ovid Sp), Embase (Ovid SP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection (ISI Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's meta-register, the International Clinical Trials Registry Portal, on 3 August 2022. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) that investigated the effects of interventions intended to prevent or reduce the use of physical restraints in older people who require long-term care. Studies conducted in residential care institutions or in the community, including patients' homes, were eligible for inclusion. We assigned all included interventions to categories based on their mechanisms and components. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently selected the publications for inclusion, extracted study data, and assessed the risk of bias of all included studies. Primary outcomes were the number or proportion of people with at least one physical restraint, and serious adverse events related to PR use, such as death or serious injuries. We performed meta-analyses if necessary data were available. If meta-analyses were not feasible, we reported results narratively. We used GRADE methods to describe the certainty of the evidence. Main results: We identified six new studies and included 11 studies with 19,003 participants in this review update. All studies were conducted in long-term residential care facilities. Ten studies were RCTs and one study a CCT. All studies included people with dementia. The mean age of the participants was approximately 85 years. Four studies investigated organisational interventions aiming to implement a least-restraint policy; six studies investigated simple educational interventions; and one study tested an intervention that provided staff with information about residents' fall risk. The control groups received usual care only in most studies although, in two studies, additional information materials about physical restraint reduction were provided. We judged the risk of selection bias to be high or unclear in eight studies. Risk of reporting bias was high in one study and unclear in eight studies. The organisational interventions intended to promote a least-restraint policy included a variety of components, such as education of staff, training of 'champions' of low-restraint practice, and components which aimed to facilitate a change in institutional policies and culture of care. We found moderate-certainty evidence that organisational interventions aimed at implementation of a least-restraint policy probably lead to a reduction in the number of residents with at least one use of PR (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.94; 3849 participants, 4 studies) and a large reduction in the number of residents with at least one use of a belt for restraint (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.73; 2711 participants, 3 studies). No adverse events occurred in the one study which reported this outcome. There was evidence from one study that organisational interventions probably reduce the duration of physical restraint use. We found that the interventions may have little or no effect on the number of falls or fall-related injuries (low-certainty evidence) and probably have little or no effect on the number of prescribed psychotropic medications (moderate-certainty evidence). One study found that organisational interventions result in little or no difference in quality of life (high-certainty evidence) and another study found that they may make little or no difference to agitation (low-certainty evidence). The simple educational interventions were intended to increase knowledge and change staff attitudes towards PR. As well as providing education, some interventions included further components to support change, such as ward-based guidance. We found pronounced between-group baseline imbalances in PR prevalence in some of the studies, which might have occurred because of the small number of clusters in the intervention and control groups. One study did not assess bedrails, which is the most commonly used method of restraint in nursing homes. Regarding the number of residents with at least one restraint, the results were inconsistent. We found very-low certainty evidence and we are uncertain about the effects of simple educational interventions on the number of residents with PR. None of the studies assessed or reported any serious adverse events. We found moderate-certainty evidence that simple educational interventions probably result in little or no difference in restraint intensity and may have little or no effect on falls, fall-related injuries, or agitation (low-certainty evidence each). Based on very low-certainty evidence we are uncertain about the effects of simple educational interventions on the number of participants with a prescription of at least one psychotropic medication. One study investigated an intervention that provided information about residents' fall risk to the nursing staff. We found low-certainty evidence that providing information about residents' fall risk may result in little or no difference in the mean number of PR or the number of falls. The study did not assess overall adverse events. Authors' conclusions: Organisational interventions aimed to implement a least-restraint policy probably reduce the number of residents with at least one PR and probably largely reduce the number of residents with at least one belt. We are uncertain whether simple educational interventions reduce the use of physical restraints, and interventions providing information about residents' fall risk may result in little to no difference in the use of physical restraints. These results apply to long-term care institutions; we found no studies from community settings.
Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices towards Using Physical Restraints in Intensive Care Units

Maha Subih,Basema Nofal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns9.13540

2022-10-24

International Journal of Health Sciences

Abstract:Background: With the fact that physical restraints is widely used in intensive care units, further studies are needed to set a baseline for evidence-based practice and to develop regulations. Aim: To examine Jordanian ICU nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices of physical restraints. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was applied using online survey. A convenience sample of 145 nurses filled out the questionnaire who were registered nurses with at least one year of experience in ICU. In addition to demographic data sheet, they completed a 3-domain questionnaire; levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding using physical restraints. Results: Participants’ scored relatively low on knowledge (M= 3.3/11, SD= 1.8), moderate on attitudes (M= 29.4/48, SD= 3.8), and moderate on practices regarding physical restraint (M=23.2/42, SD= 7). Results revealed that participants’ practice of physical restraint had a positive correlation with both their knowledge and attitudes. Many significant differences were noticed based on participants’ characteristics. Conclusion: Local guidelines should be legislated to regulate nurses’ and other care providers’ PR practices to maintain patient safety and avoid legal consequences. Also, educational programs are needed to promote nurses’ knowledge and attitudes and compliance toward the acceptable guidelines regarding PR.
Nurses' knowledge and practices of physical restraints in intensive care units: An observational study

Maysa H. Almomani,Wejdan A. Khater,Baha'a Aldin Abdel‐Latif Qasem,Rachel A. Joseph

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.625

2020-09-14

Nursing Open

Abstract:Aim: To investigate the knowledge and practice of physical restraints (PR) among Jordanian intensive care unit (ICU) nurses.Design: A descriptive, observational design was used.Methods: A convenience sampling was used to recruit participants. We examined the knowledge of PR in 301 nurses (knowledge check) and the real-time practice of PR in 81 nurses (direct observation) in ICU. A knowledge questionnaire was used to collect data on knowledge about PR use, and data on their practice of PR were observed and documented using an observation checklist.Results: The mean scores of nurses' knowledge and practices were 61.5 (SD = 12.1) and 57.4 (SD = 9.7), respectively. More than half of nurses had poor knowledge of PR use and incorrect practice of implementing PR (51.5% and 60.5%, respectively). Results indicated a positive correlation between nurses' knowledge and their use of PR.

nursing

Tubular cryocoagulation: instrumentation for "no touch" melanoma enucleation and 360 degrees scleral buckling.

Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Physical Restraints in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The Effect of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Physical Restraint Reduction in Intensive Care Units: a Protocol for an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.

“Patient Comfort Can Be Sacrificed for Patient Safety”—Perception and Practice Reported by Critical Care Nurses Toward Physical Restraints: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

Role of tumor necrosis factor on toxicity and cytokine production after isolated hepatic perfusion.

Adverse events related to physical restraint use in intensive care units: A review of the literature

Prevalence and variation of physical restraint use in acute care settings in the US

Physical restraint intervention in the intensive care unit: An observational pilot study

Protocol for the Adaptation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Physical Restraints in Critically Ill Patients

Predicting Critical Care Nurses' Intention to Use Physical Restraints in Intubated Patients: A Structural Equation Model

Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of major histocompatibility complex class II genes from inbred chicken lines.

The Current Status and Analysis of Physical Restraint Usage in Intensive Care Unit

Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Minimizing Physical Restraints Use in Intensive Care Units: An Umbrella Review

The principles of physical restraint use for hospitalized elderly people: an integrated literature review

Development and Implementation of a Novel Decision Support Tool on Physical Restraint Use in Critically Ill Adult Patients

Age-related changes in the incorporation of [35S]sulfate into two proteoglycan populations from human cartilage.

Values and Preferences of Health Care Professionals, Policy-Makers, Patients and Family Members Regarding Recommendations of Adapted Physical Restraint Guidelines in Critical Care: A Survey Research

The Use of Physical Restraints in Italian Intensive Care Units: Results From a Multicenter Observational Study

Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings

Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices towards Using Physical Restraints in Intensive Care Units

Nurses' knowledge and practices of physical restraints in intensive care units: An observational study