Abstract: State-of-the-art recommender system (RS) mostly rely on complex deep neural network (DNN) model structure, which makes it difficult to provide explanations along with RS decisions. Previous researchers have proved that providing explanations along with recommended items can help users make informed decisions and improve their trust towards the uninterpretable blackbox system. In model-agnostic explainable recommendation, system designers deploy a separate explanation model to take as input from the decision model, and generate explanations to meet the goal of persuasiveness. In this work, we explore the task of ranking textual rationales (supporting evidences) for model-agnostic explainable recommendation. Most of existing rationales ranking algorithms only utilize the rationale IDs and interaction matrices to build latent factor representations; and the semantic information within the textual rationales are not learned effectively. We argue that such design is suboptimal as the important semantic information within the textual rationales may be used to better profile user preferences and item features. Seeing this gap, we propose a model named Semantic-Enhanced Bayesian Personalized Explanation Ranking (SE-BPER) to effectively combine the interaction information and semantic information. SE-BPER first initializes the latent factor representations with contextualized embeddings generated by transformer model, then optimizes them with the interaction data. Extensive experiments show that such methodology improves the rationales ranking performance while simplifying the model training process (fewer hyperparameters and faster convergence). We conclude that the optimal way to combine semantic and interaction information remains an open question in the task of rationales ranking.

From outputs to insights: a survey of rationalization approaches for explainable text classification

Rationalization for explainable NLP: a survey

Exploring the Trade-off Between Model Performance and Explanation Plausibility of Text Classifiers Using Human Rationales

Flexible Instance-Specific Rationalization of NLP Models

Explainability of Text Processing and Retrieval Methods: A Critical Survey

Do Human Rationales Improve Machine Explanations?

Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations

Unsupervised Selective Rationalization with Noise Injection

Enhancing the Rationale-Input Alignment for Self-explaining Rationalization

Learning to Rank Rationales for Explainable Recommendation

Comparing zero-shot self-explanations with human rationales in multilingual text classification

A Survey on Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Concepts, Algorithms, Challenges

Plausible Extractive Rationalization through Semi-Supervised Entailment Signal

Automated Rationale Generation: A Technique for Explainable AI and its Effects on Human Perceptions

Towards Trustworthy Explanation: On Causal Rationalization

On the Interplay between Fairness and Explainability

Rationalizing Predictions by Adversarial Information Calibration

Individual Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Survey for Practitioners

Explainable Text Classification Techniques in Legal Document Review: Locating Rationales without Using Human Annotated Training Text Snippets

Natural Language Rationales with Full-Stack Visual Reasoning: From Pixels to Semantic Frames to Commonsense Graphs

Leveraging rationales to improve human task performance