Abstract:Rationalization empowers deep learning models with self-explaining capabilities through a cooperative game, where a generator selects a semantically consistent subset of the input as a rationale, and a subsequent predictor makes predictions based on the selected rationale. In this paper, we discover that rationalization is prone to a problem named \emph{rationale shift}, which arises from the algorithmic bias of the cooperative game. Rationale shift refers to a situation where the semantics of the selected rationale may deviate from the original input, but the predictor still produces accurate predictions based on the deviation, resulting in a compromised generator with misleading feedback. To address this issue, we first demonstrate the importance of the alignment between the rationale and the full input through both empirical observations and theoretical analysis. Subsequently, we introduce a novel approach called DAR (\textbf{D}iscriminatively \textbf{A}ligned \textbf{R}ationalization), which utilizes an auxiliary module pretrained on the full input to discriminatively align the selected rationale and the original input. We theoretically illustrate how DAR accomplishes the desired alignment, thereby overcoming the rationale shift problem. The experiments on two widely used real-world benchmarks show that the proposed method significantly improves the explanation quality (measured by the overlap between the model-selected explanation and the human-annotated rationale) as compared to state-of-the-art techniques. Additionally, results on two synthetic settings further validate the effectiveness of DAR in addressing the rationale shift problem.

Rationalization for explainable NLP: a survey

From outputs to insights: a survey of rationalization approaches for explainable text classification

Towards Trustworthy Explanation: On Causal Rationalization

A Survey on Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Concepts, Algorithms, Challenges

Automated Rationale Generation: A Technique for Explainable AI and its Effects on Human Perceptions

Towards a Framework for Evaluating Explanations in Automated Fact Verification

Enhancing the Rationale-Input Alignment for Self-explaining Rationalization

A survey on XAI and natural language explanations

Testing the effectiveness of saliency-based explainability in NLP using randomized survey-based experiments

Towards Faithful Explanations: Boosting Rationalization with Shortcuts Discovery

Flexible Instance-Specific Rationalization of NLP Models

Unsupervised Selective Rationalization with Noise Injection

Plausible Extractive Rationalization through Semi-Supervised Entailment Signal

On Evaluating Explanation Utility for Human-AI Decision Making in NLP

Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning

Reasoning with Natural Language Explanations

Unveiling the Black Box: A Comprehensive Review of Explainable AI Techniques

Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI

Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approaches: A Survey

Rational Shapley Values

Interventional Rationalization