The effects of empiric antibiotic regimens in adults with non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Maryam Ghadimi,Reed A.C. Siemieniuk,Gordon Guyatt,Mark Loeb,Afeez Abiola Hazzan,Danial Aminaei,Huda Gomaa,Ying Wang,Liang Yao,Arnav Agarwal,John Basmaji,Alexandre Grant,William S.H. Kim,Giancarlo Alvarado-Gamarra,Valery Likhvantsev,João Pedro Lima,Shahrzad Motaghi,Rachel Couban,Behnam Sadeghirad,Romina Brignardello-Petersen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.05.017
IF: 13.31
2024-06-01
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Abstract:Background The optimal empiric antibiotic regimen for non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is uncertain. Objectives To compare alternative empiric antibiotic regimens in HAP using a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods Data sources: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CINAHL from database inception to July 06, 2023. Study eligibility criteria Randomized controlled trials (RCT). Participants Adults with clinical suspicion of HAP. Intervention Any empiric antibiotic regimen versus another, placebo, or no treatment. Assessment of risk of bias Paired reviewers independently assessed risk of bias using a modified Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Methods of data analysis Paired reviewers independently extracted data on trial and patient characteristics, antibiotic regimens, and outcomes of interest. We conducted frequentist random-effects NMAs for treatment failure and all-cause mortality and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results 39 trials proved eligible. 30 RCTs involving 4,807 participants found low certainty evidence that piperacillin-tazobactam (RR compared to all cephalosporins: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.42, 1.01) and carbapenems (RR compared to all cephalosporins: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.11) might be among the most effective in reducing treatment failure. The findings were robust to the secondary analysis comparing piperacillin-tazobactam vs antipseudomonal cephalosporins or antipseudomonal carbapenems vs antipseudomonal cephalosporins. 11 RCTs involving 2,531 participants found low certainty evidence that ceftazidime and linezolid combination may not be convincingly different from cephalosporin alone in reducing all-cause mortality. Evidence on other antibiotic regimens is very uncertain. Data on other patient-important outcomes including adverse events was sparse, and we did not perform network or pairwise meta-analysis. Conclusions For empiric antibiotic therapy of adults with HAP, piperacillin-tazobactam might be among the most effective in reducing treatment failure in HAP. Empiric MRSA coverage may not exert additional benefit in reducing mortality in HAP. Registration PROSPERO (CRD 42022297224)
infectious diseases,microbiology