Pulsed electromagnetic fields potentiate bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

Kangping Song,Jing Hu,Ming Yang,Yong Xia,Chengqi He,Yonghong Yang,Siyi Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-05470-7
2024-08-06
Abstract:Background: Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) show promise as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) by reducing inflammation and promoting chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Purpose: To identify the efficacy window of PEMFs to induce BMSCs chondrogenic differentiation and explore the cellular mechanism under chondrogenesis of BMSCs in regular and inflammatory microenvironments. Methods: BMSCs were exposed to PEMFs (75 Hz, 1.6/2/3/3.8 mT) for 7 and 14 days. The histology, proliferation, migration and chondrogenesis of BMSCs were assessed to identify the optimal parameters. Using these optimal parameters, transcriptome analysis was performed to identify target genes and signaling pathways, validated through immunohistochemical assays, western blotting, and qRT-PCR, with or without the presence of IL-1β. The therapeutic effects of PEMFs and the effective cellular signaling pathways were evaluated in vivo. Results: BMSCs treated with 3 mT PEMFs showed the optimal chondrogenesis on day 7, indicated by increased expression of ACAN, COL2A, and SOX9, and decreased levels of MMP3 and MMP13 at both transcriptional and protein levels. The advantages of 3 mT PEMFs diminished in the 14-day culture groups. Transcriptome analysis identified sFRP3 as a key molecule targeted by PEMF treatment, which competitively inhibited Wnt/β-catenin signaling, regardless of IL-1β presence or duration of exposure. This inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway was also confirmed in a KOA mouse model following PEMF exposure. Conclusions: PEMFs at 75 Hz and 3 mT are optimal in inducing early-stage chondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs. The induction and chondroprotective effects of PEMFs are mediated by sFRP3 and Wnt/β-catenin signaling, irrespective of inflammatory conditions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?