Accuracy of Shunt Volume Measured by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients with an Atrial Septal Defect and a Dilated Right Ventricle
Yoshiki Yanagi,Masashi Amano,Yurie Tamai,Ayaka Mizumoto,Shoko Nakagawa,Kenji Moriuchi,Ryotaro Asano,Shinichi Kurashima,Yuki Irie,Takahiro Sakamoto,Makoto Amaki,Hideaki Kanzaki,Yasutoshi Ohta,Yoshiaki Morita,Takeshi Ogo,Takeshi Kitai,Chisato Izumi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2024.04.016
IF: 7.722
2024-05-16
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Abstract:Highlights • Qp/Qs was more accurately evaluated by 3DE than volumetric cardiac magnetic resonance. • RV and LV stroke volumes by 3DE were also accurately evaluated. • Absolute values of stroke volume by 3DE were underestimated a little. • 3DE assessment was feasible and reproducible even in a dilated RV. Background The accuracy of right ventricular (RV) quantification by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) has been reported mainly in patients with a normal RV. However, there are no data regarding the accuracy of 3DE in patients with a dilated RV, as in shunt diseases. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of 3DE and that of volumetric cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for assessment of RV and left ventricular (LV) stroke volume (SV) and the pulmonary (Q p )/systemic (Q s ) blood flow ratio in patients with an atrial septal defect (ASD) using the two-dimensional phase contrast (2DPC) method as the gold standard. Methods We retrospectively investigated 83 patients with ASD who underwent transcatheter closure and clinically indicated CMR and 3DE examinations. Q p /Q s was calculated using RV and LV SV measured by full-volume volumetric 3DE (Vol-3DE) and CMR (Vol-CMR) and by two-dimensional pulse Doppler quantification (2D-Dop); the parameters were compared using 2DPC-CMR as the gold standard. Results There was no significant difference in the Q p /Q s value between 2DPC-CMR and Vol-3DE (2.29 ± 0.70 vs. 2.21 ± 0.63, P =0.79) and 2D-Dop (vs. 2.21 ± 0.65, P =1.00); however, a significant difference was found between 2DPC-CMR and Vol-CMR ( P <0.001). The Q p /Q s value obtained using Vol-3DE showed the best correlation with 2DPC-CMR (r=0.93, P <0.001). The RV and LV SV values obtained by Vol-3DE showed the best correlation with 2DPC-CMR (RV SV, r=0.82, P <0.001; LV SV, r=0.73, P <0.001), although the absolute values were underestimated. Conclusion Qp/Qs was more accurately evaluated by Vol-3DE than by Vol-CMR or 2D-Dop. 3DE assessment was feasible and reproducible even in a dilated RV. Graphical abstract Central Illustration. Accuracy of measuring Q p /Q s and SV in both ventricles in patients with an ASD and a dilated RV. Q p /Q s was calculated using RV and LV SV measured by full-volume volumetric 3DE (Vol-3DE), Vol-CMR and 2D-Dop and compared using 2DPC-CMR as the gold standard. The RV and LV SV values obtained by Vol-3DE showed the best correlation with 2DPC-CMR. As a result, the Q p /Q s value obtained using Vol-3DE also showed the best correlation with 2DPC-CMR, although the absolute values were underestimated.SV = stroke volume, ASD = atrial septal defect, 2DPC = two-dimensional phase contrast, CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance, Vol-3DE = volumetric three-dimensional echocardiography method, Vol-CMR = volumetric CMR method, 2D-Dop = two-dimensional pulsed Doppler quantification, RV = right ventricular / ventricle, LV = left ventricular, Q p /Q s = pulmonary blood flow/systemic blood flow, LOA = limits of agreement.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems