Abstract:Alterations in attention to cues signaling the need for inhibitory control play a significant role in a wide range of psychopathology. However, the degree to which motivational and attentional factors shape the neurocomputations of proactive inhibitory control remains poorly understood. The present study investigated how variation in monetary incentive valence and stake modulate the neurocomputational signatures of proactive inhibitory control. Adults ( N = 46) completed a Stop-Signal Task (SST) with concurrent EEG recording under four conditions associated with stop performance feedback: low and high punishment (following unsuccessful stops) and low and high reward (following successful stops). A Bayesian learning model was used to infer individual's probabilistic expectations of the need to stop on each trial: P(stop). Linear mixed effects models were used to examine whether interactions between motivational valence, stake, and P(stop) parameters predicted P1 and N1 attention-related event-related potentials (ERPs) time-locked to the go-onset stimulus. We found that P1 amplitudes increased at higher levels of P(stop) in punished but not rewarded conditions, although P1 amplitude differences between punished and rewarded blocks were maximal on trials when the need to inhibit was least expected. N1 amplitudes were positively related to P(stop) in the high punishment condition (low N1 amplitude), but negatively related to P(stop) in the high reward condition (high N1 amplitude). Critically, high P(stop)-related N1 amplitude to the go-stimulus predicted behavioral stop success during the high reward block, providing evidence for the role of motivationally relevant context and inhibitory control expectations in modulating the proactive allocation of attentional resources that affect inhibitory control. These findings provide novel insights into the neurocomputational mechanisms underlying proactive inhibitory control under valence-dependent motivational contexts, setting the stage for developing motivation-based interventions that boost inhibitory control.

Monetary reward enhances response inhibition processes manifested in No-go P3

Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the differential effect of reward prospect on response selection and inhibition

Impulsive Personality Dimensions Are Associated with Altered Behavioral Performance and Neural Responses in the Monetary Incentive Delay Task

Motivational context and neurocomputation of stop expectation moderate early attention responses supporting proactive inhibitory control

Neural signature of reward-modulated unconscious inhibitory control

Go/No-Go Ratios Modulate Inhibition-Related Brain Activity: An Event-Related Potential Study

Anticipatory and consummatory neural correlates of monetary and music rewarding stimuli

Reward modulates the association between sensory noise and brain activity during perceptual decision-making

Event-Related Brain Potentials N140 and P300 during Somatosensory Go/NoGo Tasks Are Modulated by Movement Preparation

The Dark Side of Monetary Incentive

Automatic Emotion Regulation in Response Inhibition: the Temporal Dynamics of Emotion Counter-Regulation During a Go/no-Go Task.

Emotional Content Modulates Response Inhibition and Perceptual Processing.

Neural mechanism of response inhibition in a Go/NoGo tasks

Auditory induced emotion modulates processes of response inhibition: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study

NoGo-N2、P3 Effect Analysis in Go/NoGo Paradigm

Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance

Does the FRN in brain potentials reflect motivational/affective consequence of outcome evaluation?

Influence of Supraliminal Reward Information on Unconsciously Triggered Response Inhibition

No reward could be similar to penalty: Evidence from feedback negativity and P300

Reward Improves Response Inhibition by Enhancing Attentional Capture

Punishment Promotes Response Control Deficits in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Evidence from a Motivational Go/no-Go Task.