Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Chondrocyte viability is associated with the clinical success of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation.Purpose:To investigate the effect of distal femoral OCA plug harvest and recipient site preparation on regional cell viability using traditional handheld saline irrigation versus saline submersion.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:For each of 13 femoral hemicondyles, 4 cartilage samples were harvested: (1) 5-mm control cartilage, (2) 15-mm OCA donor plug harvested with a powered coring reamer and concurrent handheld saline irrigation ("traditional"), (3) 15-mm OCA donor plug harvested while submerged under normal saline ("submerged"), and (4) 5-mm cartilage from the peripheral rim of a recipient socket created with a 15-mm cannulated counterbore reamer to a total depth of 7 mm with concurrent handheld saline irrigation ("recipient"). The 15 mm–diameter plugs were divided into the central 5 mm and the peripheral 5 mm (2 edges) for comparisons. Samples were stained using calcein and ethidium, and live/dead cell percentages were calculated and compared across groups.Results:Compared with the submerged group, the traditional group had significantly lower percentages of live cells across the whole plug (71.54% ± 4.82% vs 61.42% ± 4.98%, respectively; P = .003), at the center of the plug (72.76% ± 5.87% vs 62.30% ± 6.11%, respectively; P = .005), and at the periphery of the plug (70.93% ± 4.51% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%, respectively; P = .003). The traditional group had significantly fewer live cells in all plug regions compared with the control group (77.51% ± 9.23%; P < .0001). There were no significant differences in cell viability between the control and submerged groups (whole: P = .590; center: P = .713; periphery: P = .799). There were no differences between the central and peripheral 5-mm plug regions for the traditional (62.30% ± 6.11% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%, respectively; P = .108) and submerged (72.76% ± 5.87% vs 70.93% ± 4.51%, respectively; P = .061) groups. The recipient group (61.10% ± 5.02%) had significantly lower cell viability compared with the control group (P < .0001) and the periphery of the submerged group (P = .009) but was equivalent to the periphery of the traditional group (P = .990).Conclusion:There was a significant amount of chondrocyte death induced by OCA donor plug harvesting using a powered coring reamer with traditional handheld saline irrigation, which was mitigated by harvesting the plug while the allograft was submerged under saline.Clinical Relevance:Mitigating this thermally induced damage by harvesting the OCA plug while the allograft was submerged in saline maintained chondrocyte viability throughout the plug and may help to improve the integration and survival of OCAs.

Rupture of the bladder following blunt trauma: a plea for routine peritoneotomy in patients with extraperitoneal rupture.

Subchondral Bone Alignment in Osteochondral Allograft Transplants for Large Oval Defects of the Medial Femoral Condyle: Comparison of Lateral versus Medial Femoral Condyle Donors

Molecular subtype approximated by quantitative estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her2 can predict the prognosis of breast cancer.

Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Medial Femoral Condyle in Patients With Varus and Nonvarus Alignment

Infected Post-traumatic Bone Defect of the Knee using Bipolar Osteochondral Allograft and 3D Printing: A Case Report

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Patellofemoral Joint: A Systematic Review

An Audit of Treatment of Genital Warts: Opening the Feedback Loop

Biomechanical properties of articular cartilage in different regions and sites of the knee joint: acquisition of osteochondral allografts

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Isolated Patellar Cartilage Injury

Osteochondral allograft transplantation for complex distal humeral fractures assisted by 3D computer planning and printing technology: technical note

Arthroscopic mosaicplasty for osteochondral lesions of the knee: computer-assisted navigation versus freehand technique

Functional performance of a bi-layered chitosan-nano-hydroxyapatite osteochondral scaffold: a pre-clinical in vitro tribological study

Novel Nano-composite Multilayered Biomaterial for Osteochondral Regeneration

Innovative Tissue‐Engineered Strategies for Osteochondral Defect Repair and Regeneration: Current Progress and Challenges

Repair of osteochondral defects mediated by double-layer scaffolds with natural osteochondral-biomimetic microenvironment and interface

SAFB1 Mediates Repression of Immune Regulators and Apoptotic Genes in Breast Cancer Cells*

Osteochondral Allograft Reaming Significantly Affects Chondrocyte Viability

easyCapstone: A framework for managing and assessing capstone design projects

A scheme of aggregating stream data

Bilayer osteochondral graft in rabbit xenogeneic transplantation model comprising sintered 3D-printed bioceramic and human adipose-derived stem cells laden biohydrogel

A Finite Element Model to Investigate the Stability of Osteochondral Grafts Within a Human Tibiofemoral Joint