Abstract:Shengyu Cui, 1– 4 Xinyu Wang, 1– 5 Kang Li, 1– 4 Hailong Feng, 6 Zhenlei Liu, 1– 4 Fengzeng Jian, 1– 4 Kai Wang 1– 4 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 2 Spine Center, China International Neuroscience Institute (CHINA-INI), Beijing, People's Republic of China; 3 Research Center of Spine and Spinal Cord, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 4 Lab of Spinal Cord Injury and Functional Reconstruction, China International Neuroscience Institute (CHINA-INI), Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 5 Baylor College of Medicine, Huston, TX, USA; 6 Department of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Fengzeng Jian; Kai Wang, China International Neuroscience Institute (CHINA-INI), Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China, Tel +86-1083198277, Email ; Objective: This study aims to establish a quantitative relationship between cervical lordosis (CL) and the rotation angle of the axis for the surgical reduction of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) and to explore the potential applications of this relationship in preoperative planning and selection of surgical techniques. Methods: To construct the correlation between horizontal gaze and location of axis, we introduced the angle B, defined as the angle between the Frankfort horizontal line and the extension line of the posterior edge of the axis, and explored its application in surgical planning. We retrospectively analyzed imaging data from computed tomography of 23 AAD patients who had undergone posterior reduction and fixation. Theoretical equations were deduced through a series of angular transformations, and linear regression analysis was used to validate our findings. Results: Our results showed a strong linear relationship between the change in CL (ΔCL) and the change in B(ΔB) (y=− 1.0402x, coefficient of determination R2=0.978, P< 0.001), supporting our deduction that ΔCL=ΔB. Furthermore, we found that the rotation angle of the axis (angle D) was equal to ΔCL. By resolving the atlantoaxial interval into the vertical dimension (h) and horizontal dimension (d), we could calculate the maximum vertical and horizontal distance that the axis could move theoretically according to a patient's maximum ΔCL. This finding supports our theory that the introduction of angle B can provide more precise preoperative planning and surgical technique selection for patients with AAD. Conclusion: By introducing angle B and deducing the equation ΔB=ΔCL=D, we have provided an innovative tool for preoperative planning and surgical technique selection for patients with AAD. This equation not only helps surgeons achieve more precise and effective surgical reductions but also emphasizes the important role of angle B in surgical planning. Keywords: quantitative method, sagittal alignment reduction, atlanto-axial dislocation surgery Atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) is a pathological condition characterized by the abnormal anatomical alignment of the atlas (C1) with the axis (C2), leading to instability and joint dysfunction. AAD can lead to nerve compression, and a range of clinical manifestations, from minor axial neck pain to severe complications that can even result in death. 1–4 The classification of AAD has been a subject of debate among spine surgeons, with various systems proposed to categorize the disorder based on different imaging modalities and clinical presentations. Historically, Greenberg 1 was the first to categorize AAD into two types: reducible dislocation and irreducible dislocation. This initial classification was based on the ability to reduce the dislocation through manual traction or skull traction. In 2021, Shan et al 5 proposed a more nuanced classification system that incorporated radiographs, reconstructive computed tomography (CT), and the outcome of skeletal traction. Their system aimed to provide a more detailed understanding of the dislocation's severity and its response to non-surgical interventions. More recently, there has been a move towards classifications that consider the three-dimensional aspects of AAD, including anterior-posterior, vertical, and rotational components. These classifications take into account the complex interactions between the atlas and axis and their impact on the surrounding neural structures. 6–10 The surgical -Abstract Truncated-

Influence of the type of atlantoaxial dislocation secondary to os odontoideum on sagittal alignment and balance of the subaxial cervical spine after posterior atlantoaxial fusion

[Clinical Effect of Posterior Atlanto Axial Vertebra Internal Fixation for Treatment of Instability of Occipitocervical].

The relationship between changes of cervical sagittal alignment after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and spino-pelvic sagittal alignment under roussouly classification: a four-year follow-up study

Does atlantoaxial dislocation influence the subaxial cervical spine?

Surgical Options for Instability of Atlantoaxiai Complex Combined with Odontoid Fracture

The Influence of Occipitoaxial Alignment on Subaxial Cervical Spine in Patients with Atlantoxial Dislocation and Instability

Relationship Between O-EA Angle and Lower Cervical Curvature in Patients with Anterior Atlantoaxial Dislocation Before and after Occipitocervical Fusion

Relationship Between the Alignment of the Occipitoaxial and Subaxial Cervical Spine in Patients with Congenital Atlantoxial Dislocations

Postoperative Cervical Sagittal Realignment Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Atlantoaxial Anterior Dislocation.

Clinical Outcomes of Atlantoaxial Dislocation Combined with Osteoporosis Using Posterior Atlantoaxial Rod, Screw Fixation, and Posterior Interfacet Fusion: A Retrospective Study of 21 Cases.

Surgical efficacy analysis of atlantoaxial dislocation combined with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament

Axial superior facet slope may determine anterior or posterior atlantoaxial displacement secondary to os odontoideum and compensatory mechanisms of the atlantooccipital joint and subaxial cervical spine

[Outcomes of posterior C(1-2) fusion for atlantoaxial instability or dislocation using pedicle screws of atlas and axis]

Effect of Occipitocervical Fusion for Treatment of Craniovertebral Junction Deformity Combined with Atlantoaxial Instability

Independent Correlation of the C1–2 Cobb Angle With Patient-Reported Outcomes After Correcting Chronic Atlantoaxial Instability

Relationship Between Alterations of Cervical Sagittal Parameters and Clinical Outcomes after Cervical Anterior Discectomy and Fusion

Changes in cervical sagittal balance following anterior cervical discectomy with fusion

Surgical Strategies For The Treatment Of Os Odontoideum With Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Cervical Spine Alignment and Clinical Outcomes after Multilevel Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with or Without Plate A Minimal 5-Year Follow-Up of a CONSORT-compliant Article

Cervical Sagittal Alignment As a Predictor of Adjacent-Level Ossification Development

Introducing Angle B: A Novel Quantitative Approach for Sagittal Alignment Reduction in Atlanto-Axial Dislocation Surgery