Abstract:BackgroundLong-term care settings provide care to a large proportion of predominantly older, highly disabled adults across the United States and Canada. Managing and improving quality of care is challenging, in part because staffing is highly dependent on relatively non-professional health care aides and resources are limited. Feedback interventions in these settings are relatively rare, and there has been little published information about the process of feedback intervention. Our objectives were to describe the key components of uptake of the feedback reports, as well as other indicators of participant response to the intervention.MethodsWe conducted this project in nine long-term care units in four facilities in Edmonton, Canada. We used mixed methods, including observations during a 13-month feedback report intervention with nine post-feedback survey cycles, to conduct a process evaluation of a feedback report intervention in these units. We included all facility-based direct care providers (staff) in the feedback report distribution and survey administration. We conducted descriptive analyses of the data from observations and surveys, presenting this in tabular and graphic form. We constructed a short scale to measure uptake of the feedback reports. Our analysis evaluated feedback report uptake by provider type over the 13 months of the intervention.ResultsWe received a total of 1,080 survey responses over the period of the intervention, which varied by type of provider, facility, and survey month. Total number of reports distributed ranged from 103 in cycle 12 to 229 in cycle 3, although the method of delivery varied widely across the period, from 12% to 65% delivered directly to individuals and 15% to 84% left for later distribution. The key elements of feedback uptake, including receiving, reading, understanding, discussing, and reporting a perception that the reports were useful, varied by survey cycle and provider type, as well as by facility. Uptake, as we measured it, was consistently high overall, but varied widely by provider type and time period.ConclusionsWe report detailed process data describing the aspects of uptake of a feedback report during an intensive, longitudinal feedback intervention in long-term care facilities. Uptake is a complex process for which we used multiple measures. We demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a complex longitudinal feedback intervention in relatively resource-poor long-term care facilities to a wider range of provider types than have been included in prior feedback interventions.

Ethical Problems of in Vitro Fertilization

[Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto and Chloroform Anesthesia].

[Use of recombinant human gamma interferon in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].

Possible Devices to Temporary Cover the Open Abdomen: Pros and Cons

Using the Normalization Process Theory to qualitatively explore sense-making in implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme: "It's not rocket science"

Abstract TMP106: Use of Net Promoter Score to Quantify the Participant Experience With a Telehealth Lifestyle Management and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Coaching Program

Letharia vulpina, a vulpinic acid containing lichen, targets cell membrane and cell division processes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Innovation in healthcare team feedback

Feasibility of randomized controlled trials and long-term implementation of interventions: Insights from a qualitative process evaluation of the PEDAL trial

Embedding the rehabilitation treatment specification system (RTSS) into clinical practice: an evaluation of a pilot teaching programme

A Mixed-Method Evaluation to Understand Clinician Perceptions of a Program to Implement High-Intensity Resistance Rehabilitation into Skilled Nursing Facilities

Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Supporting translation of research evidence into practice—the use of Normalisation Process Theory to assess and inform implementation within randomised controlled trials: a systematic review

Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Identifying Barriers, Facilitators, and Strategies for Implementation in Research, Education, and Clinical Care

Radiological assessment of arterial branching coefficients.

Automated near-real-time clinical performance feedback for anesthesiology residents: one piece of the milestones puzzle

Understanding feedback report uptake: process evaluation findings from a 13-month feedback intervention in long-term care settings

The role of patient-related factors in the implementation of a multimodal home-based rehabilitation intervention after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (GeRas): a qualitative process evaluation

Adenovirus vectors from various serotypes induce distinct cytokine profiles

Implementation of a people-like-me tool for personalized rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A mixed methods pilot study

Morphine protects SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells against Dickkopf1-induced apoptosis.