Abstract:Background and purposeTo investigate the image quality and accurate bone mineral density (BMD) on quantitative CT (QCT) for osteoporosis screening by deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) based on a multi-phantom and patient study.Materials and methodsHigh-contrast spatial resolution, low-contrast detectability, modulation function test (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and image noise were evaluated for physical image quality on Caphan 500 phantom. Three calcium hydroxyapatite (HA) inserts were used for accurate BMD measurement on European Spine Phantom (ESP). CT images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-veo 50% (ASiR-V50%), and three levels of DLIR(L/M/H). Subjective evaluation of the image high-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability were compared visually by qualified radiologists, whilst the statistical difference in the objective evaluation of the image high-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability, image noise, and relative measurement error were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Cohen’s kappa coefficient (k) was performed to determine the interobserver agreement in qualitative evaluation between two radiologists.ResultsOverall, for three levels of DLIR, 50% MTF was about 4.50 (lp/cm), better than FBP (4.12 lp/cm) and ASiR-V50% (4.00 lp/cm); the 2 mm low-contrast object was clearly resolved at a 0.5% contrast level, while 3mm at FBP and ASiR-V50%. As the strength level decreased and radiation dose increased, DLIR at three levels showed a higher NPS peak frequency and lower noise level, leading to leftward and rightward shifts, respectively. Measured L1, L2, and L3 were slightly lower than that of nominal HA inserts (44.8, 95.9, 194.9 versus 50.2, 100.6, 199.2mg/cm3) with a relative measurement error of 9.84%, 4.08%, and 2.60%. Coefficients of variance for the L1, L2, and L3 HA inserts were 1.51%, 1.41%, and 1.18%. DLIR-M and DLIR-H scored significantly better than ASiR-V50% in image noise (4.83 ± 0.34, 4.50 ± 0.50 versus 4.17 ± 0.37), image contrast (4.67 ± 0.73, 4.50 ± 0.70 versus 3.80 ± 0.99), small structure visibility (4.83 ± 0.70, 4.17 ± 0.73 versus 3.83 ± 1.05), image sharpness (3.83 ± 1.12, 3.53 ± 0.90 versus 3.27 ± 1.16), and artifacts (3.83 ± 0.90, 3.42 ± 0.37 versus 3.10 ± 0.83). The CT value, image noise, contrast noise ratio, and image artifacts in DLIR-M and DLIR-H outperformed ASiR-V50% and FBP (P<0.001), whilst it showed no statistically significant between DLIR-L and ASiR-V50% (P>0.05). The prevalence of osteoporosis was 74 (24.67%) in women and 49 (11.79%) in men, whilst the osteoporotic vertebral fracture rate was 26 (8.67%) in women and (5.29%) in men.ConclusionImage quality with DLIR was high-qualified without affecting the accuracy of BMD measurement. It has a potential clinical utility in osteoporosis screening.

Image Quality Assessment of a Deep Learning-Based Automatic Bone Removal Algorithm for Cervical CTA

Image Quality of Coronary CT Angiography at Ultra Low Tube Voltage Reconstructed with a Deep-Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm in Patients of Different Weight

A Deep-Learning Reconstruction Algorithm That Improves the Image Quality of Low-Tube-voltage Coronary CT Angiography

Application of Deep Learning in Analysing Morphological Parameters of Cervical Computed Tomography Scans

Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning-Based Vessel Extraction and Stenosis Detection on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Coronary Artery Disease: a Multi-Reader Multi-Case Study

Diagnostic Improvements of Deep Learning–Based Image Reconstruction for Assessing Calcification-Related Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Comparison of image quality and lesion diagnosis in abdominopelvic unenhanced CT between reduced-dose CT using deep learning post-processing and standard-dose CT using iterative reconstruction: A prospective study

[The application value of deep learning image reconstruction on improving image quality and evaluating the Qanadli embolism index of dual low-dose CT pulmonary angiography].

Application of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction-High Algorithm in One-Stop Coronary and Carotid-Cerebrovascular CT Angiography with Low Radiation and Contrast Doses.

Deep Learning Algorithm for Simultaneous Noise Reduction and Edge Sharpening in Low-Dose CT Images: A Pilot Study Using Lumbar Spine CT

Deep Learning Segmentation and Reconstruction for CT of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion

Feasibility of Ultra-low Radiation and Contrast Medium Dosage in Aortic CTA Using Deep Learning Reconstruction at 60 kVp: An Image Quality Assessment

Deep-learning Image Reconstruction for Image Quality Evaluation and Accurate Bone Mineral Density Measurement on Quantitative CT: A Phantom-Patient Study

Deep learning-based fully automatic screening of carotid artery plaques in computed tomography angiography: A multicenter study

Improvement of depiction of the intracranial arteries on brain CT angiography using deep learning reconstruction

Deep learning powered coronary CT angiography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease: The effect of reader experience, calcification and image quality

A comparative analysis of deep learning and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms with contrast-enhancement-boost post-processing on the image quality of indirect computed tomography venography of the lower extremities

Deep Learning-Based Motion Correction in Projection Domain for Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Clinical Evaluation.

Deep Learning Reconstruction for Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Origin Anomaly, Stent or Bypass Graft.

Improving Image Quality with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Double-Low-dose Head CT Angiography Compared with Standard Dose and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction

Diagnostic Accuracy and Generalizability of a Deep Learning-Based Fully Automated Algorithm for Coronary Artery Stenosis Detection on CCTA: A Multi-Centre Registry Study