Abstract:Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have gained popularity in gait analysis and human motion tracking, and they provide certain advantages over stationary line-of-sight-dependent Optical Motion Capture (OMC) systems. IMUs appear as an appropriate alternative solution to reduce dependency on bulky, room-based hardware and facilitate the analysis of walking patterns in clinical settings and daily life activities. However, most inertial gait analysis methods are unpractical in clinical settings due to the necessity of precise sensor placement, the need for well-performed calibration movements and poses, and due to distorted magnetometer data in indoor environments as well as nearby ferromagnetic material and electronic devices. To address these limitations, recent literature has proposed methods for self-calibrating magnetometer-free inertial motion tracking, and acceptable performance has been achieved in mechanical joints and in individuals without neurological disorders. However, the performance of such methods has not been validated in clinical settings for individuals with neurological disorders, specifically individuals with incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (iSCI). In the present study, we used recently proposed inertial motion-tracking methods, which avoid magnetometer data and leverage kinematic constraints for anatomical calibration. We used these methods to determine the range of motion of the Flexion/Extension (F/E) hip and Abduction/Adduction (A/A) angles, the F/E knee angles, and the Dorsi/Plantar (D/P) flexion ankle joint angles during walking. Data (IMU and OMC) of five individuals with no neurological disorders (control group) and five participants with iSCI walking for two minutes on a treadmill in a self-paced mode were analyzed. For validation purposes, the OMC system was considered as a reference. The mean absolute difference (MAD) between calculated range of motion of joint angles was 5.00°, 5.02°, 5.26°, and 3.72° for hip F/E, hip A/A, knee F/E, and ankle D/P flexion angles, respectively. In addition, relative stance, swing, double support phases, and cadence were calculated and validated. The MAD for the relative gait phases (stance, swing, and double support) was 1.7%, and the average cadence error was 0.09 steps/min. The MAD values for RoM and relative gait phases can be considered as clinically acceptable. Therefore, we conclude that the proposed methodology is promising, enabling non-restrictive inertial gait analysis in clinical settings.

Development of an IMU based 2-segment foot model for an applicable medical gait analysis

Reliability testing of an IMU-based 2-segment foot model for clinical gait analysis

Measuring highly accurate foot position and angle trajectories with foot-mounted IMUs in clinical practice

Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Estimation of Foot Trajectory for Clinical Gait Analysis

Body of evidence supporting the clinical use of 3D multisegment foot models: a systematic review

How many segments are enough to biomechanically model the feet? A comparison of inverse kinematics and dynamics in multisegmented foot models

Ability of a multi-segment foot model to measure kinematic differences in cavus, neutrally aligned, asymptomatic planus, and symptomatic planus foot types

Understanding the design differences between multisegmented foot models and their impact on joint kinetic outcomes

Validation of Non-Restrictive Inertial Gait Analysis of Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury in Clinical Settings

Estimation of Gait Mechanics Based on Simulated and Measured IMU Data Using an Artificial Neural Network

The effect of including a mobile arch, toe joint, and joint coupling on predictive neuromuscular simulations of human walking

New Perspectives on Foot Segment Forces and Joint Kinetics—Integrating Plantar Shear Stresses and Pressures with Multi-segment Foot Modeling

Multi-segment foot kinematics during gait in children with spastic cerebral palsy

Development of a Subject-Specific Foot-Ground Contact Model for Walking

Validity and Sensitivity of an Inertial Measurement Unit-Driven Biomechanical Model of Motor Variability for Gait

A novel magnet based 3D printed marker wand as basis for repeated in-shoe multi segment foot analysis: a proof of concept

IMU-Based Joint Angle Measurement for Gait Analysis

A pilot case series for concurrent validation of inertial measurement units to motion capture in individuals who use unilateral lower-limb prostheses

Estimation of Ankle Joint Power During Walking Using Two Inertial Sensors

Kinematic Analysis of Human Gait in Healthy Young Adults Using IMU Sensors: Exploring Relevant Machine Learning Features for Clinical Applications

Real-time inertial lower body kinematics and ground contact estimation at anatomical foot points for agile human locomotion