Abstract:Introduction and aim: Our society is faced with an increased number of elderly patients living at home with poor oral health status. Internationally and in Norway, the home health care service (HHCS) and the dental health care service (DHCS) are disbanding, resulting in a lack of adequate and coordinated oral health services. In the development of the intervention “Connecting ORAL health- and home health care service for patients receiving home health care” (CORAL), we recognised that user involvement was essential in the design of a coherent practice model. However, it has been debated whether users are listened to or whether they act as tokens when participating in development of interventions. The aim was therefore to investigate how different users expressed their perspectives in the co-creation process of the CORAL intervention. Methods: Three different user groups from which five patient representatives, three HHCS and five DHCS participated in two workshops. The workshops were based on innovation theories and led by researchers. To promote a creative and feasible dialogue among the users, a case was used as a boundary object in the discussions. All the user groups were encouraged to contribute with their knowledge and experiences in conversations about what they considered important in the development of a context-specific intervention to connect HHCS and DHCS. All conversations at the workshops were audio recorded and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Results: The analysis of the development process showed that the different user groups’ perspectives varied. HHCS and DHCS were more active and had a stronger “voice” during the workshops than patient representatives. We did not find any distinct disagreement at the workshops. However, the various user groups had slightly different perspectives on what was highlighted as important in the development of a context-specific intervention. There are common elements among the users; for example, they all emphasised oral health knowledge as important. Patient representatives expressed that they need knowledge about oral health rights, HHCS expressed that they needed knowledge about oral health care and DHCS expressed that they could teach the requested knowledge to the other two groups. Furthermore, the users highlighted the current service organisation and contact between the services as challenging. The patient representatives expressed a need to ensure the continuity of care as they were the ones who provided contact between the services. HHCS and DHCS expressed that they needed patient information from each other, and both service representatives gave examples of how challenging it was to collaborate with each other. Conclusion: Overall, the results showed that the three user groups have different perspectives, which highlight the importance of including all end users in the development process of an intervention. However, we acknowledge that the patient representatives’ “voice” was somewhat unclear due to their relatively inactive participation in the conversations. Implications: Designing an intervention together with the end users may lead to successful uptake among the user groups. However, inequality in user participation, may lead to diminished adaptation of the intervention to the user group whose opinions are least expressed.

Internal rotation and scapular position differences: a comparison of collegiate and high school baseball players.

Coronary and aortic atherosclerosis in Finnish men born in various regions of the country.

Splanchnic metabolism of nitrogenous compounds and urinary nitrogen excretion in steers fed alfalfa under conditions of increased absorption of ammonia and L-arginine supply across the portal-drained viscera.

Family caregivers’ involvement in caring for frail older family members using welfare technology: a qualitative study of home care in transition

Support in acute situations when a community health nurse is called: experiences of older patients, their significant others, and involved healthcare professionals- a qualitative interview study

‘They just came with the medication dispenser’- a qualitative study of elderly service users’ involvement and welfare technology in public home care services

Manoeuvring between interplay and context- an ethnographic study of social interaction in encounters between registered nurses, older patients and their relatives

Putting patients first: when home-based care staff prioritise loyalty to patients above the system and themselves. An ethnographic study

“Being in good hands”: next of kin’s perceptions of continuity of care in patients with heart failure

Solid state fermentation using agroindustrial wastes to produce aspergillus niger lipase as a biocatalyst immobilized by an adsorption-crosslinking method for biodiesel synthesis

Dependence and resistance in community mental health care-Negotiations of user participation between staff and users

Dilemmas and deliberations in managing the care trajectory of elderly patients with complex health needs: a single-case study

Contextual influences on knowledge translation capacity in a nursing home organisation: A phenomenological hermeneutical study

From neighbour to carer: An exploratory study on the role of non-kin-carers in end-of-life care at home for older people living alone

Exploring Norwegian homecare healthcare professionals perceptions of risk and the link to high-quality care: a qualitative multiple case study

Co-creating a novel practice model for connecting oral health- and home health care services – The importance of the users’ experiences

Collecting pieces for the 'puzzle': Nurses' intraprofessional collaboration in the hospital‐to‐home transition of older patients

'Making it better': self-perceived roles of family caregivers of older people living in care homes: a qualitative study

[Comparative study of organotypic cultures of glomeruli isolated from the renal cortex of the rat by 2 different technics].

Registered Nurses working together with family members of older people

'I don't think they really link together, do they?' An ethnography of multi-professional involvement in advance care planning in nursing homes