Abstract:Background/Introduction Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) constitute 8.6% of the United States population. They may have lower health literacy related to cardiovascular disease, reluctance to seek care, and communication difficulties in reporting symptoms, posing challenges to care provision. Throughout medical literature, these barriers reportedly lead to increased utilisation of diagnostic testing, hospital admission rate, and length of stay. Purpose Language barrier appears to negatively impact individuals' healthcare experience. The goal of this study is to examine whether disparities exist in the emergency department (ED) evaluation and management of chest pain in LEP patients by comparing their wait time and admission rate to that of English-proficient (EP) counterparts. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adults age 18 or older that presented to our hospital ED with a chief complaint of chest pain from 1/9/2022 to 30/9/2023. We identified all LEP patients during this period and matched a random sample of EP patients in a 1:2 ratio. We treated each encounter as an independent subject and eliminated those that left prior to disposition. Our primary outcomes were time from arrival to provider evaluation, and admission rate. Covariates were sex, age, race, acuity level, arrival mode, and insurance status to adjust for characteristic difference between cohorts. Descriptive comparisons between cohorts and bivariate outcomes were conducted using independent samples t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical ones. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to compute adjusted mean wait time for provider and adjusted odds of admission, respectively. All analyses were done on SAS 9.4. Results Our study sample included 690 encounters, with 239 LEP and 451 EP patients. The two cohorts were similar in sex, age, and acuity level, but there were significant disparities in insurance status, arrival mode, and race. A higher proportion of EP patients were admitted to the hospital or observational unit than LEP patients (45.0% vs. 28.0%, respectively, P<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, LEP patients were half as likely to be admitted compared to EP patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.35-0.74], P<0.001). LEP patients waited longer for provider evaluation from the point of ED arrival, though this was not statistically significant when adjusting for acuity and arrival mode (19.6 minutes, [95% CI, 5.9-45.1], P=0.132). Conclusions Whilst we did not observe a significant difference in wait time for provider between LEP and EP patients, LEP patients were less likely to be admitted when presenting with chest pain at the ED. One possibility is that language barrier may limit a patient's ability to convey cardiac versus non-cardiac chest pain, adversely influencing downstream management and outcomes. To address this, further large-scale investigation is needed.

Examining the association between professional language interpreter services and intensive care unit utilization among patients with non-English language preference: Evidence from a large U.S. hospital

Limited English Proficiency and Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit: An Integrated Review

Early use of professional interpreters improves trauma outcomes: Results of a single-center retrospective study

Harnessing health information technology to promote equitable care for patients with limited English proficiency and complex care needs

Limited English proficiency, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and in-hospital COVID-19 outcomes

Increased Access to Professional Interpreters in the Hospital Improves Informed Consent for Patients with Limited English Proficiency

Using artificial intelligence to promote equitable care for inpatients with language barriers and complex medical needs: clinical stakeholder perspectives

Effective Use of Interpreter Services for Diverse Patients in a Safety-Net Hospital: Provider Perceptions of Barriers and Solutions

Language Access Systems Improvement initiative: impact on professional interpreter utilisation, a natural experiment

Association of non-English language preference with postoperative hospital visits among California Medicaid enrollees

Abstract 16079: Outcomes Among Heart Failure Patients With Non English Language Preference

Stories from COVID-19 Reveal Hospitalized Patients with Limited English Proficiency Have Always Been Uniquely Prone to Social Isolation

Through the eyes of Spanish-speaking patients, caregivers, and community leaders: a qualitative study on the in-patient hospital experience

Effect of Virtual Versus In Person Interpreting on Diabetes Outcomes in Non-English Language Preference Patients: A Pilot Study

Interpreter Use and Patient Satisfaction in the Otolaryngology Outpatient Clinic

Platelet-to-lymphocyte Ratio As a Predictive Index for Delirium in Critically Ill Patients A Retrospective Observational Study

Communication Practices for Families With Languages Other Than English in US Neonatal Care Units

Language barrier as social determinant of health: unmasking the disparities in the emergency department evaluation for patients with chest pain at a community hospital

The use of interpreter services and its barriers faced by hospital staff when accessing interpreters for patients with low English proficiency during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Utilization and perceptions of language assistance services by medical trainees: a pathway to language certification

Assessing the influence of patient language preference on 30 day hospital readmission risk from home health care: A retrospective analysis