Abstract:Background: The ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) is essential to preserving functional independence and quality of life. In recent years, rehabilitation strategies based on new technologies, such as MYO Armband®, have been implemented to improve dexterity in people with upper limb impairment. Over the last few years, many studies have been published focusing on the accuracy of the MYO Armband® to capture electromyographic and inertial data, as well as the clinical effects of using it as a rehabilitation tool in people with loss of upper limb function. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, there has been no systematic review of this subject. Methods: A systematically comprehensive literature search was conducted in order to identify original studies that answered the PICO question (patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome): What is the accuracy level and the clinical effects of the MYO Armband® in people with motor impairment of the upper limb compared with other assessment techniques or interventions or no intervention whatsoever? The following data sources were used: Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and the Cochrane Library. After identifying the eligible articles, a cross-search of their references was also completed for additional studies. The following data were extracted from the papers: study design, disease or condition, intervention, sample, dosage, outcome measures or data collection procedure and data analysis and results. The authors independently collected these data following the CONSORT 2010 statement when possible, and eventually reached a consensus on the extracted data, resolving disagreements through discussion. To assess the methodological quality of papers included, the tool for the critical appraisal of epidemiological cross-sectional studies was used, since only case series studies were identified after the search. Additionally, the articles were classified according to the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for diagnosis studies established by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. Also, The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used by two independent reviewers to assess risk of bias, assessing the six different domains. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was followed to carry out this review. Results: 10 articles with a total 180 participants were included in the review. The characteristics of included studies, sample and intervention characteristics, outcome measures, the accuracy of the system and effects of the interventions and the assessment of methodological quality of the studies and risk of bias are shown. Conclusions: Therapy with the MYO Armband® has shown clinical changes in range of motion, dexterity, performance, functionality and satisfaction. It has also proven to be an accurate system to capture signals from the forearm muscles in people with motor impairment of the upper limb. However, further research should be conducted using bigger samples, well-defined protocols, comparing with control groups or comparing with other assessment or therapeutic tools, since the studies published so far present a high risk of bias and low level of evidence and grade of recommendation.

Interrater Reliability and Precision of a Novel Hand Strength Assessment and Treatment Device: The GripAble

Modernising grip dynamometry: Inter-instrument reliability between GripAble and Jamar

Automated Quantifiable Assessments of Sensorimotor Function Using an Instrumented Fragile Object

GripAble: Interrater reliability and normative grip strength of UK population

Reliability, validity and usability of the K-force® grip dynamometer to evaluate handgrip-strength in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness

Reliability of Forearm Skin Thermal Assessment During Handgrip Exercise

Test-Retest Reliability and Convergent Validity of a Computer Based Hand Function Test Protocol in People with Arthritis

Measurement and Analysis of Grip Strength Using Advanced Methods

Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of knee extensor strength measured by a novel device incorporated into a weight stack machine vs. handheld and isokinetic dynamometry

A Home-Based Functional Hand-Extremity Assessment System for Stroke Rehabilitation

Intrarater Test-Retest Reliability of Hip Abduction, Internal Rotation, and External Rotation Strength Measurements in a Healthy Cohort Using a Handheld Dynamometer and a Portable Stabilization Device: A Pilot Study

Isometric hand grip strength measured by the Nintendo Wii Balance Board - a reliable new method

Analysis of Maximal Grip Strength Using Three Types of Dynamometer

Patient-Reported Outcomes Can Serve as a Functional Substitute for Grip Strength

Therapy effect on hand function after home use of a wearable assistive soft-robotic glove supporting grip strength

Relationship among grip strength, functional outcomes, and work performance following hand trauma

An sEMG-Controlled Forearm Bracelet for Assessing and Training Manual Dexterity in Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

Laboratory-Based Examination of the Reliability and Validity of Kinematic Measures of Wrist and Finger Function Collected by a Telerehabilitation System in Persons with Chronic Stroke

Domo-Grip: Functional Evaluation and Rehabilitation Using Grip Force

Grip power test: A new valid and reliable method for assessing muscle power in healthy adolescents

Comparison of the Jamar dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter for grip strength measurements in a healthy elderly population