Abstract:Background The accurate and reliable measurement of muscle strength is a valuable tool in most medical practices. The use of dynamometers allows for objective muscle strength assessment. Even so, dynamometry has its limitations due to increased cost and inconvenience in the clinic. Isokinetic dynamometers, the gold standard, are typically very large and expensive. However, smaller hand-held dynamometers are a cheaper and more efficient alternative. Hand-held dynamometers have been shown to demonstrate comparable reliability to the more expensive isokinetic dynamometers, despite their reduced cost and ease of use. Even though hand-held dynamometers are cheaper and more convenient to use in the clinical setting, their price tag is still burdensome for most medical practices, commonly costing $1000 or more. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of luggage scales vs. dynamometers for measuring shoulder scaption strength. Methods One hand-held dynamometer was compared to two luggage scales using a set-up intended to mimic clinical testing. The set-up consisted of each device being tethered to the floor with the opposite end tied to a length of paracord that had been placed through a shoulder-height pulley and fastened to a flat plate used to hold the weight. In total, ten trials were completed, where a 2.3 kg (5 lb), 4.5 kg (10 lb), and 11.3 kg (25 lb). weight was measured by each device. Analysis of variance was used to compare the numerical data for the three groups. Results Our results indicate that there were no significant differences in the force measurements between each device (P = .99). The average force measurements between the three dynamometers were: 2.3 kg trial: 2.3 kg, 2.4 kg, and 2.2 kg; 4.5 kg trial: 4.5 kg, 4.6 kg, and 4.5 kg ; and 11.3 kg trial: 11.4 kg, 11.3 kg, and 11.4 kg. for the digital dynamometer, digital luggage scale, and the analog luggage scale, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed there was also no difference in force measurements between the 3 devices for the 2.3 kg, 4.5 kg, and 11.3 kg. trials (P = .14, P = .49, and P = .40, respectively). Conclusion Our data demonstrates that two inexpensive luggage scales showed no statistically significant differences in measurements compared to an expensive hand-held dynamometer. Utilization of luggage scales to measure shoulder scaption strength should yield similar results to handheld dynamometers. This may be an alternative, objective measure of manual muscle strength that is both efficient and economical.

Modernising grip dynamometry: Inter-instrument reliability between GripAble and Jamar

GripAble: Interrater reliability and normative grip strength of UK population

Interrater Reliability and Precision of a Novel Hand Strength Assessment and Treatment Device: The GripAble

Reliability and Validity of Two Hand Dynamometers when Used by Community-Dwelling Adults Aged over 50 Years

Comparison of the Jamar dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter for grip strength measurements in a healthy elderly population

1042 COMPARISON BETWEEN CAMRY AND JAMAR DYNAMOMETERS IN MEASURING HAND GRIP STRENGTH AMONG OLDER POST-ACUTE COVID-19 OUTPATIENTS

Isometric hand grip strength measured by the Nintendo Wii Balance Board - a reliable new method

Reliability and criterion validity of a low-cost handgrip dynamometer: The Camry

Variability between Different Hand-Held Dynamometers for Measuring Muscle Strength

Measuring handgrip strength in school children: inter-instrument reliability between Takei and Jamar

Reliability, validity and usability of the K-force® grip dynamometer to evaluate handgrip-strength in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness

A Cross-Sectional Validation Study of Camry EH101 versus JAMAR Plus Handheld Dynamometers in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Their Correlations with Bioelectrical Impedance and Nutritional Status

Standardization of grip strength measurements. Effects on repeatability and peak force

Automated Quantifiable Assessments of Sensorimotor Function Using an Instrumented Fragile Object

Intrarater Test-Retest Reliability of Hip Abduction, Internal Rotation, and External Rotation Strength Measurements in a Healthy Cohort Using a Handheld Dynamometer and a Portable Stabilization Device: A Pilot Study

Validity and reliability of a finger training tool for assessing metacarpal phalangeal joint ranges of motion in asymptomatic participants

Are luggage scales a viable alternative to hand-held dynamometers for the measurement of shoulder scaption strength?

Reliability and Validity of Cervical Range of Motion and Muscle Strength Testing

Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of knee extensor strength measured by a novel device incorporated into a weight stack machine vs. handheld and isokinetic dynamometry

Isometric Force-Time Curve Assessment: Accuracy, Precision, and Repeatability of a Mobile Application and Portable and Lightweight Device

Validity and reliability of a low-cost dynamometer to assess maximal isometric strength of upper limb