Movement disorder phenotype in CTNNB1-syndrome: A complex but recognizable phenomenology

Giacomo Garone,Alice Innocenti,Melissa Grasso,Alessandra Mandarino,Alessandro Capuano,Gessica Della Bella,Flaminia Frascarelli,Daria Diodato,Roberta Onesimo,Giuseppe Zampino,Antonio Novelli,Maria Cristina Digilio,Andrea Bartuli,Maria Lisa Dentici,Pasquale Parisi,Serena Galosi,Davide Tonduti,Enrico Bertini,Lorenzo Sinibaldi,Nicola Specchio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107057
Abstract:Introduction: CTNNB1 gene loss-of-function variants cause Neurodevelopmental disorder with spastic diplegia and visual defects (NEDSDV, OMIM 615075). Although motor impairment represents a core feature of this condition, the motor phenotype remains poorly described. We systematically assessed a cohort of 14 patients with disease-causing CTNNB1 variants to better characterize the movement disorder phenotype. Methods: patients were enrolled at Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital in Rome, Italy, between January 2019 and February 2024. 14 participants were included and underwent extensive genetic and neurologic examination. Clinical features, neuroimaging and neurophysiological investigations were retrospectively analyzed from medical charts and video recordings. Results: 13 out of 14 patients showed motor disorders (one only showing mild coordination difficulties). 12 presented abnormal gait (11 patients with broad-based gait, one with narrow-based in-toeing gait, one with broad-based gait with unilateral intoeing). One did not achieve walking ability. 13 patients presented progressive lower limbs hypertonia without overt pyramidal signs. Five patients reported exaggerated startle, three developed upper body (prominently cervical) dystonia in the second decade, with or without bradykinesia (2/13). Treatment efficacy was variable: botulinum toxin was (at least partially) effective in 5/6, levodopa in 1 of 4 treated patients. Conclusions: CTNNB1-syndrome is associated with a peculiar, but recognizable movement disorder phenotype, encompassing complex gait disorders with progressive lower limb hypertonia, exaggerated startle, and possible occurrence in the second decade of life of upper body dystonia with or without bradykinesia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?