Feeding and defecation patterns of nymphs of Triatoma rubrofasciata (De Geer, 1773) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), and its potential role as vector for Trypanosoma cruzi.

M. V. Braga,M. M. Lima
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02761999000100025
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Abstract:Although Triatoma rubrofasciata is occasion-ally found naturally infected by Trypanosoma cruzi(AR da Silva 1983 Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 77 :568-569, RP Brazil et al. 1985 Rev Soc Brasil MedTrop : 257-260) it is not considered an importantvector of Chagas disease. It is normally the vectorof Trypanosoma conorhini which infects Rattusrattus since this insect is in close association withthe rat. It is found mostly in port cities (H Lent & PWygodzinsky 1979 Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 163:125-520) and the knowledge on its biology is stillscarce.Aiming at understanding the role of this spe-cies in the transmission of Chagas disease, the feed-ing and defecation patterns of nymphs of each in-star were observed.The eggs and nymphs were separated from acolony maintained in the Laboratory of Biologyand Control of Vector Insects, Oswaldo Cruz In-stitute. As soon as the hatchings occurred, or 5 to10 days after molting, the nymphs were separatedand fed individually on Swiss mouse. The mousewas immobilized in a nylon mosquito net “sand-wich”, put in a wide glass container, and thenymphs were allowed to search for the food sourcefor a maximum period of 2 hr. The following pa-rameters were observed for all instar nymphs: timespent to begin feeding, duration of feeding, num-ber of interruptions during feeding and number oftimes that the nymphs eliminated a dark excretaand a clear excreta during and soon after feeding.The data were statistically analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis one-way test and the Chi-square test (SSiegel 1956 Nonparametric Statistics for the Be-havioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 350pp).In all instars more than 70% of the nymphsspent less than 10 min to begin feeding after beingplaced in the glass container, although some ofthem, from 1st to 4th, have spent more than 20min. Among these, the major percentage occurredin the 2nd instar (20%) and the lesser in the 1st(7%). All 5th instar nymphs began feeding before20 min after being placed in the container. Withexception of the 3rd instar, approximately 60% ofthe nymphs from 1st, 2nd, and 4th instars and 90%from the 5th instar spent more than 15 min feed-ing. More than 50% of the nymphs from the 1st tothe 4th instar and 35% from 5th instar did not in-terrupt feeding.Comparing the results for all instars shown inTable I, the statistical analysis was significantlydifferent for the duration of feeding (H=20.5,P 0.05 andH=1.3, P>0.05, respectively). However, some dis-crepancies occurred. In the 2nd instar, one nymphspent 54 min to begin feeding and only 17 min tofeed and in the 3rd instar, a nymph spent 39 min tobegin and only 11 min to feed.Table II shows the percentages of nymphs thateliminated the dark and clear excreta during or soonafter feeding. The percentages of defecation dur-ing feeding were very low (maximum of 5% in the5th instar) and defecation soon after feeding on ornear the host were lower than 10% in all instars.However, approximately 90% of the nymphs from1st, 2nd and 3rd instars, 100% from 4th instar and80% from 5th instar eliminated the excreta far fromthe food source, a long time after having finishedfeeding. The nymphs more often eliminated a clearexcreta during or soon after feeding. The statisti-cal tests did not show any difference among theinstars (c
What problem does this paper attempt to address?