Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical effects of primary revision after artificial hip replacement and causes of revision surgery. Methods A total of 344 patients who underwent revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and artificial femoral head replacement from January 2010 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 141 males and 203 fe?males, with a mean age 65.64±10.81 years (28-87 years). A total of 351 hip revisions were performed in 344 patients with 7 pa?tients in bilateral revisions. All patients were followed up for 60.38±22.75 months (24-105 months). All patients with periprosthet?ic infection underwent two?stage revision after prosthesis placement, and all others underwent one?stage revision. The clinical out?comes of revision surgery were assessed with the Harris hip score and the survival rate of the revision prosthesis. According to the duration from artificial hip replacement to revision surgery, all patients were divided into early revision (less than 5 years) and late revision (more than 5 years) groups. They were also divided into two groups according to the age of the patient in revision sur?gery:＞55?year?old and≤55?year?old groups. The causes of revision, hip reoperation and re?revision were recorded. Results In the 351 hip revisions, a total of 238 (67.8%) had aseptic loosening, 41 (11.7%) periprosthetic fractures, 30 (8.5%) periprosthetic infection, 23 (6.6%) recurrent dislocation and 19 (5.4%) the eccentric liner wear. The infection rate was significantly higher in the early revision group (21.1%) than that in the late revision group (4.2%) (χ2=24.443, P＜0.001). The aseptic loosening rate was sig?nificantly higher in the late revision group (72.4%) than that in the early revision group (54.4%) (χ2=9.899, P=0.002). Sixteen pa?tients underwent hip surgery after revision, including 6 recurrent dislocations, 4 aseptic loosening, 3 periprosthetic fractures, and 3 periprosthetic infections. Eight of them underwent revision surgery, including 4 cases of aseptic loosening, 2 cases of periprosthet? ic fractures, and 2 cases of recurrent dislocation. The duration from the primary revision to the second revision was 22.1 ± 10.0 months (1-75 months). The 5?year and 8?year survival rates of the revision prostheses were 99.3%[95% CI(98.3%, 100.3%)] and 92.6% [95% CI(87.1%, 98.1%)], respectively. The proportions of prosthetic infection and eccentric liner wear in the≤55?year?old group were significantly higher than those in the＞55?year?old group (χ2=3.981, P=0.046; χ2=5.226, P=0.022), while the propor?tion of aseptic loosening in the＞55?year?old group was significantly higher than that in the ≤55?year?old group (χ2=5.254, P=0.022). The 8?year survival rates of the revision prostheses of ≤55?year?old group and＞55?year?old group were 76.8% [95% CI (50.5% , 103.1% )] and 95.4% [95% CI (91.1% , 99.7% )], respectively. Conclusion Young patients have a higher risk of re?revi?sion after revision THA.

Prevalence and Impact of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Total Hip or Knee Revision Surgery

Prevalence, risk factors, microbiological results and clinical outcome in unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in unclear and presumed aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties - A ten-year retrospective analysis with a minimum follow up of 2 years

Unexpected positive cultures in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty

Prevalence of unexpected intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)

Unsuspected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Prevalence, Management, and Infection-Free Survivorship

Unexpected Positive Cultures In Hip And Knee Periprosthetic Fractures

Withholding Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Knee Prosthesis Revision: A Retrospective Analysis on Culture Results and Risk of Infection

Prognostic Implications of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Two-Stage Knee Arthroplasty Reimplantations: A Minimum Five-Year Retrospective Analysis

Undiagnosed Periprosthetic Infections in First-Time Aseptic Revision Hip Arthroplasties

Unexpected positive cultures in conversion hip and knee arthroplasty

Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision

Intramedullary positive tissue culture increases the risk of re-infection following one-stage septic revision total knee arthroplasty

Revision Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Post Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty of 34 Hospitals in China Between 2015 and 2017: a Multi-Center Survey

Evaluation of Causes and Clinical Effects of Revision Surgery after Artificial Hip Replacement

Incidence and Risk Factors for Acid-fast Bacillus/Fungal Culture Positivity in Primary, Conversion, and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

The fate of positive intraoperative cultures following conversion total hip arthroplasty

Bacterial pathogens and in-hospital mortality in revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee: analysis of 346 patients

Safety of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Two-Stage Revision of Septic Hip Arthroplasties

Microbiology of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infections in Surgically Revised Cases from 34 Centers in Mainland China

The incidence of subclinical infection in patients undergoing revision shoulder stabilization surgery: a retrospective chart review

The Impact of Culture Negativity on the Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Chronic PJI