Abstract:Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the management and outcomes of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (arTKA) with unsuspected positive cultures (UPCs) compared to those with sterile cultures. Methods The institutional database at a single tertiary center was retrospectively reviewed for arTKA from January 2013 to October 2023. Patients who met Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for periprosthetic infection (PJI) based on available preoperative infectious workup, received antibiotic spacers, or did not have at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Patients were stratified based on intraoperative cultures into 4 cohorts: sterile cultures, 1 UPC, ≥ 2 UPCs with different organisms, and ≥ 2 UPCs with the same organism. Univariable analyses were used to compare these groups. Kaplan-Meyer survivorship analysis assessed infection-free survival at 5 years, and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to evaluate factors that influence infection-free survival. A total of 691 arTKAs at a mean follow-up of 4.2 years were included in the study. Of these, 49 (7.1%) had 1 UPC with a new organism, 10 (1.4%) had ≥ 2 UPCs of the same organism, and 2 (0.2%) had ≥ 2 UPCs with different organisms. Results Postoperative antibiotics were prescribed to 114 (16.5%) patients — 13 (26.5%) with 1 UPC, 6 (60.0%) with ≥ 2 UPCs of the same organism, and 0 (0.0%) of patients who had ≥ 2 UPCs of different organisms. There were no differences in infection-free survival at 5 years between patients who had sterile cultures and 1 UPC (96 versus 89%; P = 0.39) nor between sterile cultures and ≥ 2 UPCs of different organisms (96 versus 100%; P < 0.72). However, patients who had ≥ 2 UPCs of the same organism had significantly worse infection-free survival at 5 years compared to patients who had sterile cultures (58 versus 96%; P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression suggested that when adjusting for covariates, an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of ≥ 3 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.1; P = 0.007), ≥ 2 UPCs of the same organism (HR = 11.0; P < 0.001), 1 UPC (HR = 4.2; P = 0.018), and arTKA with hinge constructs (HR = 4.1; P = 0.008) were associated with increased risk of re-revision for PJI. Conclusion Patients who had 1 UPC or ≥ 2 UPCs with different organisms had similar infection-free survival at 5 years as patients who had sterile cultures. However, patients who had ≥ 2 UPCs of the same organism had significantly worse infection-free survival at five years. Overall, 1 UPC or ≥ 2 UPCs of the same organism at the time of arTKA may suggest the patient is at higher risk of re-revision for PJI. More studies are needed to determine what interventions can be implemented to mitigate this risk.

Prevalence of unexpected intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)

Prevalence, risk factors, microbiological results and clinical outcome in unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in unclear and presumed aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties - A ten-year retrospective analysis with a minimum follow up of 2 years

Prevalence and Impact of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Total Hip or Knee Revision Surgery

Unsuspected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Prevalence, Management, and Infection-Free Survivorship

Prognostic Implications of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Two-Stage Knee Arthroplasty Reimplantations: A Minimum Five-Year Retrospective Analysis

Unexpected positive cultures in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty

Unexpected Positive Cultures In Hip And Knee Periprosthetic Fractures

Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision

Intramedullary positive tissue culture increases the risk of re-infection following one-stage septic revision total knee arthroplasty

Unexpected positive cultures in conversion hip and knee arthroplasty

Withholding Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Knee Prosthesis Revision: A Retrospective Analysis on Culture Results and Risk of Infection

Early Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Microorganisms, Mortality, and Implant Survival Using a Combined Dataset From the Dutch Arthroplasty Register and the Dutch National Nosocomial Surveillance Network

Revision Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Post Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty of 34 Hospitals in China Between 2015 and 2017: a Multi-Center Survey

Trends in Revision Knee Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Center Study of 384 Knees at a High-Volume Center Between 2008 and 2021

Enhancing the data capture of periprosthetic joint infections in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry: validity assessment and incidence estimation

Bacterial pathogens and in-hospital mortality in revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee: analysis of 346 patients

Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of different criteria in identification of periprosthetic infection after knee arthroplasty

Temporal Trends in the Rate of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection

[Low UKA implantation volume, comorbidities, male sex, and implantation of constrained TKA are risk factors for septic revision after knee arthroplasty implantation : A register-based study from the German Arthroplasty Register]

Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Knee—Comparison of Different Treatment Algorithms

Undiagnosed Periprosthetic Infections in First-Time Aseptic Revision Hip Arthroplasties