Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Hip arthroscopy in patients with borderline hip dysplasia has satisfactory outcomes at short-term follow-up; however, the data on midterm outcomes are inconsistent, and failure rates are high in some studies, limiting understanding of the role and utility of hip arthroscopy in this patient cohort.Purpose:To provide an up-to-date, evidence-based review of the clinical outcomes of primary hip arthroscopy in patients with frank or borderline hip dysplasia at ≥5-year follow-up and report the failure rate and progression to total hip arthroplasty in this cohort.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A comprehensive literature search was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated outcomes of primary hip arthroscopy in patients with lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) <25° at ≥5-year follow-up. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies scoring system. Level of evidence was determined using criteria from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.Results:Nine studies were included in this review. Patients with LCEA <25° demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and significant postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at follow-up ranging from a ≥5 to 10 years. Studies comparing patients with dysplasia to those without did not demonstrate significant differences in preoperative, postoperative, or delta PROs or in failure, reoperation, or revision rates. There was no overall significant correlation between outcomes and LCEA stratification.Conclusion:Hip arthroscopy in carefully selected patients with LCEA <25° can be successful at mid- to long-term follow-up and may provide clinical outcomes and failure rates comparable with patients with normal LCEA, understanding that this is a singular, 2-dimensional radiographic measure that does not differentiate instability from impingement or combinations thereof, warranting future studies delineating these differences. These findings suggest that hip dysplasia may not be an absolute contraindication for isolated hip arthroscopy and may serve as a viable intervention with consideration of staged future periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Importantly, this review does not suggest that hip arthroscopy alters the natural history of dysplasia; therefore, patients with dysplasia should be counseled on the potential utility of PAO by appropriate hip preservation specialists.

Editorial Commentary: Decreased Hip Ligament Thickness in Patients With Dysplasia May Contribute to Hip Instability, Above and Beyond Associated Acetabular Under-coverage

Hip dysplasia associated with abduction contracture of the contralateral hip

Role of the Anterior Center-Edge Angle on Acetabular Stress Distribution in Borderline Development Dysplastic of Hip Determined by Finite Element Analysis

Anatomical insights beyond the center edge angle in Borderline Hip Dysplasia: A Computerized tomography study

The effects of high-dose corticosteroids in patients with septic shock. A prospective, controlled study.

Editorial Commentary: The Hip "Windshield Wiper Sign": An Osteochondral Defect of the Anterolateral Femoral Head, Predicts Instability and Allows Planning of Combined Arthroscopic Cartilage Therapy and Periacetabular Osteotomy

Association Between Anterior Hip Capsule Thickening and Sagittal Pelvic Alignment Among Patients With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Relationship Between Hip Capsular Thickness and Instability After Previous Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Matched-Cohort Analysis

Ligamentum Teres Tears and Increased Combined Anteversion Are Associated With Hip Microinstability in Patients With Borderline Dysplasia

Hip dysplasia hiding in plain sight: A retrospective analysis of radiology reports

What happens to the gluteus medius in young and middle-aged patients with hip dysplasia?

Acetabular Diameter Assessment and Three-Dimensional Simulation for Acetabular Reconstruction in Dysplastic Hips

Why do subchondral cysts occur at the medial aspect of the femoral head in hip dysplasia?

Primary Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Acetabular Dysplasia: A Systematic Review of Published Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

Prediction of 3-Dimensional Coverage Surface Area of the Femoral Head in Hip Dysplasia Through Conventional Computed Tomography

The Epidemiology and Demographics of Hip Dysplasia

Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopy with Labral Preservation or Reconstruction Plus Capsular Closure Shows Excellent Outcome in Patients with Borderline Hip Dysplasia and is Less Invasive Than Periacetabular Osteotomy

Morphology of the dysplastic hip and the relationship with sex and acetabular version

Prevalence of Acetabular Dysplasia at a Mean age of 18 Years After Treatment for Neonatal hip Instability

Relationship between spinal sagittal alignment and acetabular coverage: a patient-matched control study

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Controversies in Management