Abstract:Objectives: Full-thickness transtendinous supraspinatus tears involve a large portion of the tendon that remains attached to the footprint that often leaves insufficient medial tissue for tension free footprint restoration with traditional suture anchor repair. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and failure rates for arthroscopic side-to-side suture repair for transtendinous tears to traditional double-row repair for more common tendon avulsions. We hypothesized poorer objective and subjective outcomes as well as higher retear rates for side-to-side suture repair. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 18 consecutive patients with full-thickness transtendinous supraspinatus tears repaired with arthroscopic side-to-side sutures (Group 1) compared to 36 matched controls with classic tendon avulsion from the footprint repaired with double-row knotless transosseous equivalent (TOE) repairs (Group 2). All procedures were performed by a single surgeon with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Demographics and prospectively collected patient reported outcomes (PROs) were collected including postoperative active range of motion (AROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). Failure defined as a symptomatic re-tear diagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or need for revision surgery was also determined. Preoperative tear size and Goutallier stage were recorded from MRIs. Results: There were no significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 regarding mean follow-up (49 months vs. 52.4 months, p = 0.640) and age (68.7 ± 6.8 vs. 67.1 ± 9.6, p = 0.550). With respect to clinical outcomes and PROs, there were no differences in postoperative VAS for pain score (1 ± 1.54 vs 1.5 ± 2.1, p = 0.537), SSV score (92.2 ± 9.1 vs 87.1 ± 10.9, p = 0.086), or ASES score (90.8 ± 9.9 vs 83.1 ± 23.9, p = 0.377). No differences were identified for postoperative AROM forward flexion (153 ± 14 vs 156 ± 16, p= 0.194), external rotation (53 ± 6 vs 51 ± 9, p= 0.498) and internal rotation score (6.4 ± 1.8 vs 7.2 ± 1.2, p=0.244). There was no statistically significant difference in failure rates between cohorts (11.1% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.255). Regarding preoperative tear characteristics, fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus (1.2 ± 1 vs 1.5 ± 0.7, p= 0.307) and anteroposterior tear size were similar (21.3 ± 9.3 vs 24 ± 8, p = 0.322), although lower grades of fatty infiltration in the infraspinatus was present in Group 1 (0.3 ± 0.6 vs 1.1 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Arthroscopic side-to-side suture repair for supraspinatus tears yields excellent outcomes with low failure rates comparable to tendon-to-bone double suture anchor repair for typical avulsion type tears. Retention of the large tendon stump on the greater tuberosity with side-to-side repair also allows restoration of anatomy without undue tension in this uncommon scenario.

Performance Measurement of Knowledge Sharing Based on Knowledge Capital

Arthroscopic Double-Pulley Suture-Bridge Repair of Supraspinatus Tendon Tear

[Early effectiveness of arthroscopic tri-anchor double-pulley suture-bridge repair of medium-size supraspinatus tendon tears]

Single Versus Double-Row Repair of the Rotator Cuff

A Knotless Single-Row Suture Bridge Technique to Repair a Partial Articular Suproaspinatus Tendon Avulsion-Type Rotator Cuff Tear: Surgical Technique

Arthroscopic double row partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion bridge repair technique for shoulder: A transtendinous approach

Arthroscopic Single-Row Modified Mason-Allen Repair Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Reconstruction for Supraspinatus Tendon Tears

Clinical Outcomes and Repair Integrity After Double-Row Modified Mason-Allen Repair Technique With a Single Knot in Small to Medium Supraspinatus Tears

Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Technique for Repairing Rotator Cuff Tears: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Poster 154: Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Side-to-Side Sutures for Full-Thickness Transtendinous Supraspinatus Tears Yields Excellent Outcomes and Low Retear Rates Similar to Traditional Tendon-to-Bone Fixation at Mean Follow Up of 4 Years

Comparison of suture-bridge and independent double-row techniques for medium to massive posterosuperior cuff tears: a two-year retrospective study

Suture Anchor Technique for Bridge Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Restoration

Efficacy of arthroscopic suture bridge technique for treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears

Semi–Bone Tunnel Technique Using Double-Row Suture Bridge Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma Hydrogel for Rotator Cuff Repair in a Rabbit Model

Neuropeptide families: an evolutionary perspective.

Optimal Suturing Techniques in Patch-Bridging Reconstruction for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Finite Element Analysis

The early clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture-bridge technique for full-thickness rotator cuff tears

Single-row, double-row, and transosseous equivalent techniques for isolated supraspinatus tendon tears with minimal atrophy: A retrospective comparative outcome and radiographic analysis at minimum 2-year followup

A Parachute Suturing Technique for Rotator Cuff Tear

Optimizing pectoralis major tendon repair: a modified knotless suture anchor technique using high-strength suture and tape

A Biomechanical Study of Double-row Suture-bridge and Double-screw Fixation Strength in Split-type Greater Tuberosity Fractures of the Humerus