Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT As lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIF) are increasingly performed, our understanding of postoperative clinical trajectories are important in informing preoperative patient expectations. While minimum clinically important difference (MCID) rates are widely utilized in spine surgery literature, there is less published on how long it takes for patients to achieve MCID following LLIF. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the length of time it takes for patients to report MCID achievement for back pain, leg pain, disability, and physical function and evaluate predictors of time to achieve MCID. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This is a retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing elective LLIF with baseline and postoperative patient-reported outcomes reported. OUTCOME MEASURES Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), VAS-Back, VAS-Leg, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) METHODS Patients undergoing elective LLIF by the senior author with baseline and postoperative PROs recorded were retrospectively identified. Data on potential predictors of time to MCID achievement were gathered including demographics, comorbidities, diagnostic information, and baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs). MCID achievement rates for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale-Back (VAS-Back), VAS-Leg, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) were calculated at six-, twelve, 6 month- 1 year- and 2-year postoperative timepoints. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to determine the proportion of patients achieving MCID at each timepoint. A multivariate Cox regression determined predictors of time to MCID achievement. RESULTS One hundred and five patients were included in the analysis. The mean time to achieve MCID for PROMIS-PF was 44.7 weeks, for VAS-Back was 38.5 weeks, for VAS-Leg was 36.7 weeks and for ODI was 38.3 weeks. Worse baseline VAS-Back significantly predicted for earlier MCID achievement for VAS-Back (HR: 1.55), while diabetes was predictive of later MCID achievement (HR: 0.21). Higher body mass index and worse preoperative ODI predicted earlier MCID achievement for ODI (HR: 1.04-1.08), and higher VAS-Leg score, and two-level fusion were predictive of later MCID achievement for ODI, (HR:0.26-0.81). Worse preoperative VAS-Leg, isthmic spondylolisthesis, and three-level fusion were predictors of earlier achievement of MCID for VAS-Leg (HR: 1.27-6.47). Herniated nucleus pulposus and foraminal stenosis were early predictors (HR: 2.92-3.23) and workers' compensation was a late predictor of MCID attainment for PROMIS-PF (HR: 0.13). CONCLUSIONS Select demographic variables, comorbidities, spinal pathology, and preoperative PROs influenced the time it took for patients to report clinically significant improvements in pain, disability, and physical function scores. These findings can be used to prognosticate outcomes for patients undergoing LLIF and inform patient expectations of postoperative recovery. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

The PROMIS-10 Mental Health T-Score an Independent Predictor of Recovery for Up to 1 Year following Elective Lumbar Spine Fusion

Mental Health Rather than Mental Disorders as a Predictor of Immediate Postoperative Recovery Following Elective Lumbar Fusion: Using the PROMIS-10 Global Mental Health T-Score

Does Baseline Mental Health Influence Outcomes among Workers’ Compensation Claimants Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Utility of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Mental Health T-Score to Identify Patients at Risk for Poor Postsurgical Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

788 Impact of Preoperative Mental Health State on Perioperative Surgical Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Fusions: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2009-2020)

Patient Reported Physical and Mental Health Outcomes Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion versus Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement

How Do Functional Comorbidities Affect PROMIS-PF Scores Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery?

Development and temporal validation of clinical prediction models for 1-year disability and pain after lumbar decompressive surgery. The Norwich Lumbar Surgery Predictor (development version)

One Year Patient Reported Outcomes After Single-Level Lumbar Fusion at Orthopedic Specialty Hospital Compared to Tertiary Referral Center

Discrepancy between global- and disease-specific outcome measures following lumbar spine surgery

Impact of Depression on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Lumbar Spine Decompression

Depression Increases Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Revision Rates and Diminishes Neck Disability Index Improvement

A 3-Year Study Investigating the Utility of PROMIS-29 for Long-Term Follow-Up in Adult Spinal Deformity

Correlations Between Psychiatric Disorders and Perioperative Outcomes After Lumbar Fusions: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2009-2020)

P282. Predictors of time to achieve clinically significant improvements following lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Predictors of time to achieve clinically significant improvements following lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Depression Identified on the Mental Component Score of the Short Form-12 Affects Health Related Quality of Life After Lumbar Decompression Surgery

Measuring Value in Spine Care Using the PROMIS-Preference Scoring System

Using Oswestry Disability Index as a Preoperative Surgical Eligibility Criterion for Patients Requiring Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease

Preoperative Resilience and Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusion

Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-reported Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis