Proceedings of the 8th European Congress of Neurosurgery Barcelona, September 6–11, 1987

F. Isamat,A. Jefferson,F. Loew,L. Symon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8975-7

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

One Year Patient Reported Outcomes After Single-Level Lumbar Fusion at Orthopedic Specialty Hospital Compared to Tertiary Referral Center

Rajkishen Narayanan,Teeto Ezeonu,Jeremy C. Heard,Yunsoo Lee,Azra Dees,Goutham Yalla,Jose A. Canseco,Mark F. Kurd,Ian David Kaye,Barrett I. Woods,Alan S. Hilibrand,Alexander R. Vaccaro,Gregory D. Schroeder,Christopher K. Kepler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.024

IF: 4.297

2024-09-14

The Spine Journal

Abstract:Background Context Lumbar spinal fusion is an increasingly common operation to treat symptoms related to degenerative disorders of the spine including radiculopathy and pain. As the volume of spine surgeries grows, it is becoming increasingly common for procedures to take place in non-tertiary care centers, including orthopaedic specialty hospitals (OSH). While previous research demonstrates that surgical outcomes at an OSH are non-inferior to those at a tertiary referral center (TRC), the implications of this difference on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have not been sufficiently assessed. Purpose The objectives of this study were (1) to determine if changes in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) after elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery differ between patients who undergo surgery at an orthopedic specialty hospital (OSH) and those who undergo surgery at a tertiary referral center (TRC) and (2) to characterize differences in short-term outcomes between hospitals. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Patient Sample Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who underwent primary, elective single-level posterior lumbar decompression and fusion between January 2014 and December 2021 at a tertiary referral center or an orthopaedic specialty hospital. Outcome Measures PROMs: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-form 12 (SF12) Mental Component Summary (MCS); SF12 Physical Component Summary (PCS); Visual Analogue Back and Leg (VAS Back/Leg) Methods PROMs were collected preoperatively, 6 months after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. Six-month and 1-year delta PROM values were calculated by subtracting the preoperative PROM score from the 6-month or 1-year score, respectively. Multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the independent effect of hospital location on postoperative PROM scores. Results A total of 288 patients were identified as part of the study cohort including 205 patients who underwent surgery at the tertiary hospital and 83 patients who underwent surgery at the OSH. OSH patients had shorter length of stay (1.57 ± 0.72 vs. 3.28 ± 1.32, p 0.05). At 6 months, having surgery at the specialty hospital was associated with higher PCS (estimate = 2.96, confidence interval: 0.21 – 5.71, p=0.035). At 1-year postoperatively, the location of surgery no longer demonstrated significant associations with PROM scores. Preoperative PROM scores demonstrated significant associations with 6-month and 1-year scores for each PROM (p<0.05) except VAS leg at 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is one of the largest studies investigating PROMs at OSH versus TRCs for single-level lumbar fusions. We demonstrated that at one-year follow-up, there is not a significant difference in PROM improvement between patients who undergo surgery at a TRC and patients who do so at an OSH.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
Suppression of behavior by timeout punishment when suppression results in loss of positive reinforcement.

A. Kaufman,Alan Baron

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/JEAB.1968.11-595

1968-09-01

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Abstract:This investigation, using rats as subjects and punishment by timeout for responses maintained on a ratio schedule, sought to determine whether behavior would be suppressed by timeout punishment when such suppression also reduced reinforcement density or frequency. A series of experiments indicated that timeout punishment suppressed responding, with the degree of suppression increasing as a function of the duration of the timeout period. Suppressive effects were found to decrease as a function of increases in deprivation (body weight) and were eliminated when the punished response also was reinforced. It was concluded that timeout can produce aversive effects even when loss of reinforcement results. An alternative interpretation of the findings, based on the effects of extinction periods and delay of reinforcement on chained behavior, was discussed.
The correlation between bone mineral density and surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

Xing Zhao,Ke Zhou,Yan Ma,Xiangqian Fang,Fengdong Zhao,Wenbin Xu,Shunwu Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2014.01.007

2014-01-01

Abstract:Objective To observe the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).Methods From January 2006 to December 2010,69 patients with DS had undergone PLIF by the same surgical team.According the BMD,the cases were divided into two groups.Normal group (T ≥-1.0) had 33 cases [Male 16 cases,Female 17 cases; mean age,(56.5±9.0) yrs; L,,5 20 cases,L5S1 13 cases].The osteopenia group (T ＜-1.0) had 36 cases [Male 13 cases,Female 23 cases; mean age,(60.5±7.8) yrs; L4.5 21 cases,L5S1 15 cases].Blood loss,surgical duration,intra-and post-operative complications were collected.The clinical improvement was quantified by measurement of pain (visual analogue scale,VAS) and Roland-Morris (RM) Disability Questionnaire.Between two groups,the differences of age,body mass index,blood loss,VAS improvement,and RM improvement were compared.The correlation between BMD and sex,age,segment,screw loose,nonunion,and cage subsidence was analyzed.Results In two groups,the difference between pre-and post-operative RM and VAS was significant respectively.The blood loss was 415.5± 105.8 ml in normal group,significantly less than 528.3±128.7 ml in osteopenia group.There was no significant difference in the duration between normal group (169.7±44.3 min) and osteopenia group (176.4±42.6 min).The improvement of VAS and RM between two groups had no significant difference.There was a negative correlation between the BMD and blood loss (r=-0.407,P=0.001).The other surgical outcomes (surgical duration,VAS improvement,RM improvement,cage subsidence,nonunion,screw loose and etc.) had no correlation with BMD.Conclusion There is a negative correlation between the BMD and blood loss in DS patients managed by PLIF.BMD has no effect on other surgical outcomes.
Impact of Preoperative Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Lumbar Fusion

Omar H Tarawneh,Rajkishen Narayanan,Delano Trenchfield,Yunsoo Lee,Tariq Z Issa,Yoni Dulitzki,Bahram Pashaee,Krisna Maddy,Hannah Bash,Gokul Karthikeyan,Lan David Kaye,John J Mangan,Jose A Canseco,Alan S Hilibrand,Alexander R Vaccaro,Christopher K Kepler,Gregory D Schroeder,Joseph K Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.006

Abstract:Objective: The Pfirrmann scoring system classifies lumbosacral disc degeneration based on magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity. The relationship between pre-existing disc degeneration and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after one-level lumbar fusion is not well documented. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of preoperative intervertebral disc degeneration and preoperative and postoperative PROMs in patients undergoing one-level lumbar fusion. Methods: All adult patients who underwent posterior lumbar decompression and fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between 2014 and 2022 were included. Patient demographics and comorbidities were extracted from medical records. Lumbar intervertebral discs on sagittal magnetic resonance imaging T2-weighted images were assessed by 2 independent graders utilizing Pfirrmann criteria. Grades I-III were categorized as low-grade disc degeneration, while IV-V were considered high grade. Multivariable linear regression assessed the impact of disc degeneration on PROMs. Results: A total of 150 patients were included, of which 69 (46%) had low-grade disc degeneration, while 81 (54%) had high-grade degeneration. Patients with high-grade degeneration had increased preoperative visual analog scale (VAS)-Leg scores (6.10 vs. 4.54, P = 0.005) and displayed greater 1-year postoperative improvements in VAS-Back scores (-2.11 vs. -0.66, P = 0.002). Multivariable regression demonstrated Pfirrmann scores as independent predictors for both preoperative VAS-Leg scores (P = 0.004) and postoperative VAS-Back improvement (P = 0.005). Conclusions: In patients undergoing one-level lumbar fusion, higher Pfirmann scores were associated with increased preoperative leg pain and greater 1-year postoperative improvement in back pain. Further studies into the relationship of preoperative disc degeneration and their impact on postoperative outcomes may help guide clinical decision-making and patient expectations.
How do spinopelvic parameters influence patient-reported outcome measurements after lumbar decompression?

Srikanth N. Divi,Dhruv K.C. Goyal,Daniel R. Bowles,Victor E. Mujica,Ryan Guzek,I. David Kaye,Mark F. Kurd,Barrett I. Woods,Kris E. Radcliff,Jeffrey A. Rihn,D. Greg Anderson,Alan S. Hilibrand,Christopher K. Kepler,Alexander R. Vaccaro,Gregory D. Schroeder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.101

IF: 4.297

2020-10-01

The Spine Journal

Abstract:Background ContextSpinopelvic parameters indicative of sagittal imbalance include a pelvic tilt (PT) greater than 20° and a mismatch between pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) greater than 10°. However, unlike in fusion surgery, the relationship between spinopelvic parameters and patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery for neurologic symptoms is less clear.PurposeTo determine whether PROMs are affected by the amount of residual (postoperative) PI-LL mismatch or PT in patients undergoing one- to three-level lumbar decompression surgeriesDesignRetrospective cohort study (Level of Evidence: III)Patient SamplePatients undergoing between one to three levels of lumbar decompression surgery at a single, academic institution.Outcome MeasuresPROMs—including the PCS-12, MCS-12, ODI, and VAS Back and Leg pain scores—and radiographic measurements of spinopelvic parameters.MethodsPatients were separated into groups based on a postoperative PI-LL mismatch of ≤ 10° or > 10° and a postoperative PT < 20° or ≥ 20°. Absolute PROM scores, the recovery ratio (RR) and the percentage of patients achieving Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) between groups were compared and a multiple linear regression analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 167 patients were included, with 27 patients in the PI-LL > 10° group and 91 patients in the PT ≥ 20° group. All groups exhibited significant improvement after surgery for each PROM included (p<0.05) except for MCS-12 scores in the PI-LL ≤ 10° group and both PT groups. Comparing between groups, all patients were similar with respect to preoperative scores, postoperative scores, change in scores, recovery ratios, and percentage change in MCID, except that patients with PT ≥ 20° had higher pre- and postoperative VAS Back scores (p=0.036 and p=0.024, respectively). With multiple linear regression, postoperative PI-LL > 10° and PT ≥ 20° were not significant predictors of worse outcomes for any measured PROM.ConclusionsPatients with postoperative measurements PI-LL > 10° and PT ≥ 20° without instability had similar PROMs at 1-year after limited lumbar decompression when compared to patients without a spinopelvic mismatch.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery

Gustavo Zanoli

Abstract:Background: There is no consensus regarding outcomes assessment in spine patients. When using Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in assessing outcomes of treatment, normative data for different diagnoses are needed to allow comparisons between existing and future studies. The most used generic instrument for HRQoL evaluation in spine pathologies is SF-36. There is no standard definition of important differences in spine surgery patients and no standard reference for minimal clinically important difference. Objective: The overall aim of this thesis was to increase understanding of some aspects of outcome measurement in patients operated on for lumbar spine problems using existing prospective data available at the spine section of the Orthopedics Department of the University of Lund, and, moreover, to explore potentials and weaknesses in the methodology of retrospectively analysis of prospectively collected observational data. Methods: A systematic web-search and review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of prospective cohort data collected within the data collection protocol in use by the Swedish Spine Register. Since 1993 all persons undergoing elective lumbar surgery at the spine section of the Orthopedics Department of the University of Lund were included in the prospective registration protocol either in its first version (1993-1997), which was the source of data for paper III, or in its revised version after 1998. Initial information at baseline (the day before surgery) included age, sex, smoking habits, duration of preoperative back and leg pain in months, duration of preoperative sickleave in months, number of previous operations, patient's working status, diagnostic techniques pre- and postoperatively VAS scores analgesic intake, walking distance. Postoperatively, change in leg and back pain, respectively, was recorded on a 5-point Likert Scale as compared to preoperative status, patient satisfaction was recorded on a 3-point Likert Scale. Results: The number of proposed outcomes, outcome scores, outcome instruments is incredibly high: no new HRQoL instruments specific for LBP are needed. The data collection protocol of the Swedish Spine Register studied can reliably detect postoperative improvements between large groups of patients such as in a Register. Pain intensity measured on the VAS correlates significantly to other indicators of perceived pain, but correlation is not as strong as it could be if they were all measuring the same construct. HRQoL as measured by SF-36 in patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery showed a pronounced reduction compared to normal and LBP population. The use of norm-based scoring for SF-36 can help interpretation and simplify graphic representation of the findings. SF-36 outcomes 1-year after surgery for lumbar spine disorders are improved, although other factors or natural history could contribute to this improvement. The global effect of spine surgery in our sample is quite similar to effect sizes of very successful orthopedic interventions. The use of standardised outcome measures allows international comparisons, although caution should be used in the interpretation of differences. Conclusions: Without the need of additional expensive data collection and using limited economic resources an increased understanding of some aspects of outcome measurement in patients operated on for lumbar spine problems has been achieved. Reference values and more speculative data (such as effect sizes and MCIDs) have been presented. The ecological methodology has been presented and discussed: with a clear respect for its limitations, it could be used to obtain relevant information also in other clinical fields.
Targeting CDK9: a promising therapeutic opportunity in prostate cancer.

M. Rahaman,Malika Kumarasiri,Laychiluh B Mekonnen,Mingfeng Yu,Sarah Diab,H. Albrecht,R. Milne,Shudong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-16-0299

2016-12-01

Abstract:Cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) is a key transcriptional regulator and a lucrative target for cancer treatment. Targeting CDK9 can effectively confine the hyperactivity of androgen receptor and the constitutive expression of anti-apoptotic proteins; both being main causes of prostate cancer (PCa) development and progression. In castrate-resistant PCa, traditional therapies that only target androgen receptor (AR) have become obsolete due to reprograming in AR activity to make the cells independent of androgen. CDK9 inhibitors may provide a new and better therapeutic opportunity over traditional treatment options by targeting both androgen receptor activity and anti-apoptotic proteins, improving the chances of positive outcomes, especially in patients with the advanced disease. This review focuses on biological functions of CDK9, its involvement with AR and the potential for therapeutic opportunities in PCa treatment.
P241. Comparison of age differences in clinical outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy

John Sencaj,Gregory Snigur,Andrea M. Roca,Fatima Anwar,Alexandra C. Loya,Srinath Medakkar,Arash Sayari,Kern Singh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.364

IF: 4.297

2024-08-20

The Spine Journal

Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT In the United States, one of the more commonly performed elective spine surgical procedures is lumbar discectomy for treatment of disc herniation in patients experiencing back or leg pain that is unresponsive to conservative treatment. The general age of the US population is rising with an expected increase in the frequency of surgical interventions for age-related spine conditions Studies have shown that older patients demonstrate recurrence of herniations earlier while younger patients have lower rates of reoperation for herniations. PURPOSE This purpose of this study is to understand the impact of age on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy to better manage patient selection for physicians and expectations regarding post-surgical recovery for patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This study is a retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE A single spine surgeon's records were searched to identify patients who underwent primary lumbar discectomy. Eligible patients did not undergo treatment for malignancy, trauma, or infection, and had recorded PROMs. In total, 1,144 patients were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures included minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and perioperative traits such as herniated disc diagnosis, spinal pathologies, number of discectomy levels, operative time, blood loss volume, postoperative stay duration, pain, and narcotic use. Collected PROMs were Visual Analog Scale-back and leg pain (VAS-Back, VAS-L), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and physical function scores including PROMIS-Physical Function, Veteran Rands 12-Item Form Physical Composite Score (VR-12 PCS) and Short Form 12-Item Physical Function domain (SF-12 PCS). METHODS Included patients underwent surgery from December 2005 to April 2023. Patients were divided by age into four categories: Age I (25-35 years), Age II (35-45), Age III (45-55), and Age IV (+55). Demographic and perioperative data were extracted and compared using chi-square tests (categorical variables) or independent samples t-test (continuous variables). PROMs were compared using chi-squared and ANOVA analysis. Post-hoc testing was conducted using Tukey tests. RESULTS Preoperatively, no significant intercohort differences existed. At the 6-week follow-up, intercohort VAS-Back scores (p=0.048) and SF-12 PCS scores (p=0.030) were different, and by the final follow-up, a significant difference was seen in PROMIS-PF scores (p=0.028). Significant differences in MCID achievement rates occurred in VR-12 PCS (p=0.026), SF-12 PCS (p=0.002), PROMIS-PF (p<0.001), and VAS-Back (p<0.001), with Age I exhibiting overall higher MCID achievement rates. Post-hoc Tukey test revealed significant MCID achievement rates for VAS-B were between Age II and Age III (p=0.40), and significant for PROMIS-PF between Age I and Age III (p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS Our study underscores the role of age in determining the outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy, a procedure likely to increase in frequency in the coming decades. Notably, our research ventured beyond the traditional elderly-versus-younger categorizations common in previous studies by highlighting significant variations in PROMs and MCID achievement rates across more finely-stratified age groups. PROMs distinctions emerged at 6-week and final postoperative follow-ups for back pain and physical function. The 25-35 age group demonstrated higher MCID achievement rates. This nuanced approach reveals that age-related influences on recovery extend beyond just the elderly population, presenting information to better guide patient selection and counseling in the realm of spine surgery. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
The disaggregation of the oswestry disability index in patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

Jan Hambrecht,Paul Köhli,Erika Chiapparelli,Krizia Amoroso,Ranqing Lan,Ali E Guven,Gisberto Evangelisti,Marco D Burkhard,Koki Tsuchiya,Roland Duculan,Jennifer Shue,Andrew A Sama,Frank P Cammisa,Federico P Girardi,Carol A Mancuso,Alexander P Hughes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.001

2024-09-08

Abstract:Background context: The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for assessing functional status in individuals with lumbar spine pathology. The ODI is used by surgeons to determine the initial status and monitor progress after surgery. Compiled ODI data enables comparisons between different surgical techniques. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) often causes symptoms such as back pain and neurogenic claudication affecting quality of life and activities of daily living captured by the ODI. Despite extensive studies on ODI changes after spinal surgery, little is known about the characteristics and changes in the different ODI subsections. Purpose: To analyze the baseline characteristics and changes in total ODI and ODI subsections 2 years after elective lumbar surgery. Study design: Retrospective analysis on patients prospectively enrolled who underwent spinal surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis from 2016 to 2018. The ODI was assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Patient sample: A total of 265 patients were included in the study, 60% were female. The mean age of the patients was 67±8 years, and the mean BMI was 30±6 kg/m2. Outcome measures: The analysis considered the differences in ODI scores before and after surgery, as well as the changes in all ODI subsections 2 years after elective lumbar surgery for DLS. Methods: The analysis evaluated differences in ODI scores and variations in different subsections. Patients without an ODI follow-up at 2 years were excluded from the study. The study utilized the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for all prepost paired samples. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for sex and procedure comparisons for overall ODI and ODI subsection analysis. Univariate linear regression was applied for overall and subsection specific ODI outcomes with age and BMI as independent variables, respectively. The statistical significance level was set at p<.05. Results: Improvement in ODI was observed in 242 patients (91%). The highest baseline disability values were found for the questions regarding pain intensity (3.4±1.3), lifting (3.2±1.9), and standing (3.4±1.3). The lowest preoperative functional limitations were observed in sleeping (1.6±1.3), personal care (1.6±1.4), traveling (1.6±1.2) and sitting (1.5±1.4). At the 2-year follow-up, there was significant improvement in all questions and the overall ODI (all p<.001). The ODI subsections that showed the greatest absolute improvements were changing degree of pain (-2.6), with 89% of patients experiencing improvement, standing (-2.4) with 87% of patients experiencing improvement, and pain intensity (-2.1) with 81% of patients experiencing improvement. The subsections with the least improvement were personal care (-0.6), sitting (-0.7), and sleeping (-0.9). The study found that female patients had a significantly higher preoperative disability in various subsections but showed greater improvement in total ODI compared to male patients (p=.001). Additionally, improvement in sitting (p<.001), traveling (p<.001), social life (p<.001) and sleeping (p=.018) were significantly higher in female patients. Older patients showed significantly less improvement in sitting (p=.005) and sleeping (p=.002). A higher BMI was significantly associated with less improvement in changing degree of pain (p=.025) and higher baseline disability in various subsections. Patients who underwent decompression and fusion had significantly higher baseline disability in several subsections compared to those who underwent decompression alone. There was no significant difference between decompression alone and decompression with fusion in terms of overall improvement in the ODI and improvement in the subsections. Conclusion: These results offer a more comprehensive understanding of ODI and its changes across different subsections. This insight is invaluable for improving preoperative education and effectively managing patient expectations regarding potential postsurgery disability in specific areas.
277 Clinical Outcome With and Without Adherence to Evidence-based Medicine Guidelines for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Fusion Patients

Glenn Arturo Gonzalez Ozuna,Guilherme Bastos Porto,Miao Jingya,Kevin Hines,Daniel Franco,Matthew O'Leary,Sara Thalheimer,James S. Harrop

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002809_277

IF: 5.315

2024-04-01

Neurosurgery

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS) patients are treated with instrumented fusion, following EBM guidelines, and typically have excellent clinical outcomes. However, not all lumbar fusion procedures adhere to EBM guidelines, typically due to a lack of prospective data. METHODS: This study compared outcomes of lumbar fusion procedures for degenerative spondylolisthesis in two groups: 125 patients treated according to EBM guidelines and 21 patients without EBM literature support. ODI scores were collected pre- and post-surgery and categorized into SCB, MCID, no MCID, or no change/worsening. Statistical analysis included χ 2 , Fisher exact, and t-student tests. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed the odds of achieving MCID after six months of follow-up. RESULTS: The study included a total of 146 lumbar fusion patients, with the majority (125/146) adhering to EBM guidelines (EBM concordant) while a smaller proportion (21/146) did not (EBM discordant). The EBM concordant group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in ODI scores compared to the EBM discordant group (p = 0.02). Compliance with EBM guidelines was associated with higher odds of achieving MCID, with an odds ratio of 2.93 and a confidence interval of 1.128-7.58 (p = 0.027). In the EBM concordant group, 42% of patients achieved SCB, and 64.8% showed MCID, whereas in the EBM discordant group, only 14% achieved SCB, and 38.1% showed MCID. These findings suggest that adherence to EBM guidelines in lumbar fusion procedures may lead to better clinical outcomes for patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients whose lumbar fusions met the EBM criteria exhibited better self-reported outcomes at six months compared to those who did not meet the requirements. In order to strengthen EBM-guided patient care, an expanded knowledge base is needed.

surgery,clinical neurology
Impact of Depression on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Lumbar Spine Decompression

Robert K Merrill,Lukas P Zebala,Colleen Peters,Sheeraz A Qureshi,Steven J McAnany

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002329

2018-03-15

Abstract:Study design: A retrospective cohort study. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect depression has on the improvement of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following lumbar decompression. Summary of background data: Decompression without fusion is a viable treatment option for lumbar spine stenosis. Depression reportedly has a negative impact on PROMs after certain types of spine surgery, though verification of this with new, more precise outcome measures is needed. Methods: We included consecutive adult patients who underwent lumbar decompression for lumbar spine stenosis between 2016 and 2017 who had PROM information system (PROMIS) physical function, pain, depression, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires completed preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up. Patients with a PROMIS depression score >50 or <50 were allocated to the depressed and not depressed groups, respectively. The cohorts were compared using unpaired t tests and repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with statistical significance taken at P < 0.05. Results: The analysis included 55 patients without depression and 56 patients with depression. Depressed patients had worse preoperative PROMIS physical function (30.08 vs. 36.66, P = 0.005), PROMIS pain (69.36 vs. 64.69, P < 0.0001), and ODI scores (51.92 vs. 36.35, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the depressed group had worse postoperative PROMIS physical function (36.29 vs. 40.34, P = 0.005), PROMIS pain (60.16 vs. 54.87, P < 0.0001), and ODI scores (37.01 vs. 23.44, P = 0.0003). We observed a statistically significant interaction between depression status and pre to postoperative improvement in outcome for PROMIS physical function (F[1,109] = 102.5, P < 0.0001) and depression scores (F[1,109] = 15.38, P = 0.0002). No interaction was found for pain and ODI scores. Conclusion: Our results suggest that depressed patients experience a greater magnitude of improvement in PROMIS physical function and depression scores than nondepressed patients. Despite this, depressed patients have worse postoperative outcomes for PROMIS physical function, depression, pain, and ODI. These findings are important for risk stratifying and treating depressed patients before lumbar spine decompression. Level of evidence: 3.
Patient Reported Physical and Mental Health Outcomes Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion versus Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement

Mohammad Daher,Jonathan Liu,Makeen Baroudi,Daniel Alsoof,Mariah Balmaceno-Criss,Bassel G Diebo,Valentin Antoci,Alan H Daniels

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.106

2024-08-24

Abstract:Background: Total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) are reliable surgical procedures for alleviating pain and optimizing function. Spinal fusion has also been shown to be beneficial, however the comparative benefit of THA/TKA to lumbar spinal fusion is incompletely understood. Methods: This study analyzed a single-center database of patients who underwent primary lumbar spinal fusion, elective primary TKA, or THA. PROMs included Veterans-Rand (VR12) Physical and mental component score (PCS/MCS) for TKA/THA and PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) global mental and physical health (GPH/GMH) for spinal fusion. Results: 356 patients who underwent TKA, 290 underwent THA, and 125 underwent spinal fusion were included. Joint replacement patients were older, with higher body mass index in the TKA group. Spine patients had a lower improvement in physical health than the joint patients (TKA: 9.4 ± 11.2, THA: 15.2 ± 11.2, Spine: 6.2 ± 8.7, p<.001) and a lower proportion of patients reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Spine patients had higher GMH improvements compared to TKA patients (TKA: -1.1 ± 10.7, THA: 1.1 ± 11.9, Spine: 1.8 ± 8.4, p=.009) and the highest proportion of patients reaching the MCID. Conclusion: Spinal fusion, total knee arthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty all significantly improved PROMs at 1-year follow-up. At baseline, spinal fusion patients had better physical function scores and worse mental health scores compared to joint arthroplasty patients, while spinal fusion resulted in mean smaller gains in patient reported physical function and higher gains in patient reported mental health function compared to arthroplasty.
Mental Health Rather than Mental Disorders as a Predictor of Immediate Postoperative Recovery Following Elective Lumbar Fusion: Using the PROMIS-10 Global Mental Health T-Score

Matthew J Solomito,Regina O Kostyun,Laura Dzurec,Heeren Makanji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005083

2024-07-01

Abstract:Study design: Retrospective comparative cohort. Objective: Investigate how a patient's mental health, as measured using the PROMIS-10 Global Mental Health T-Score (MHT), influences their in-hospital recovery following elective one to two level lumbar fusion. Summary of background data: The intersection of mental and physical health among candidates for lumbar fusion has increased. While there is strong evidence to suggest mental disorders can influence a patient's postoperative recovery, there is a paucity of information detailing the association between unrecognized low mental health and surgical outcomes. The MHT may provide a more nuanced insight to a patient's preoperative mental health status. Methods: 637 patients that underwent one or two level elective lumbar fusion between April 2020 and June 2023 were analyzed for this study. Patients were stratified by their MHT (Above Average [AA] >50, control 40-50, Below Average [BA] <40) regardless of mental illness diagnosis. Outcome measures including: pain scores both during activity and at rest, opioid consumption during the in-hospital stay, and ambulation distance were compared among groups using both univariate and multivariate models to control for confounders. Results: The majority of patients reported average (41.4%) to above average (35.3%) mental health. After controlling for confounders, findings suggested that patients in the BA group reported higher pain, consumed more opioids, and had shorter ambulation distances than patients in the AA group (P=0.004, P-0.008, and P=0.020 respectively). Patients in the AA group were 84% less likely to be discharged to a facility compared to the BA group (P=0.001). Conclusion: The MHT was an independent predictor of immediate postsurgical recovery, while a mental disorder diagnosis was not. A preoperative MHT<40, may represent and additional risk factor that has not previously been identified in patients undergoing elective lumbar fusion.
Physical functioning in the lumbar spinal surgery population: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of outcome measures and measurement properties of the physical measures

Katie L Kowalski,Jai Mistry,Anthony Beilin,Maren Goodman,Michael J Lukacs,Alison Rushton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307004

IF: 3.7

2024-08-29

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background: International agreement supports physical functioning as a key domain to measure interventions effectiveness for low back pain. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used in the lumbar spinal surgery population but physical functioning is multidimensional and necessitates evaluation also with physical measures. Objective: 1) To identify outcome measures (PROMs and physical) used to evaluate physical functioning in the lumbar spinal surgery population. 2) To assess measurement properties and describe the feasibility and interpretability of physical measures of physical functioning in this population. Study design: Two-staged systematic review and narrative synthesis. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to a registered and published protocol. Two stages of searching were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Health & Psychosocial Instruments, CINAHL, Web of Science, PEDro and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. Stage one included studies to identify physical functioning outcome measures (PROMs and physical) in the lumbar spinal surgery population. Stage two (inception to 10 July 2023) included studies assessing measurement properties of stage one physical measures. Two independent reviewers determined study eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (RoB) according to COSMIN guidelines. Measurement properties were rated according to COSMIN criteria. Level of evidence was determined using a modified GRADE approach. Results: Stage one included 1,101 reports using PROMs (n = 70 established in literature, n = 67 developed by study authors) and physical measures (n = 134). Stage two included 43 articles assessing measurement properties of 34 physical measures. Moderate-level evidence supported sufficient responsiveness of 1-minute stair climb and 50-foot walk tests, insufficient responsiveness of 5-minute walk and sufficient reliability of distance walked during the 6-minute walk. Very low/low-level evidence limits further understanding. Conclusions: Many physical measures of physical functioning are used in lumbar spinal surgery populations. Few have investigations of measurement properties. Strongest evidence supports responsiveness of 1-minute stair climb and 50-foot walk tests and reliability of distance walked during the 6-minute walk. Further recommendations cannot be made because of very low/low-level evidence. Results highlight promise for a range of measures, but prospective, low RoB studies are required.
How Do Functional Comorbidities Affect PROMIS-PF Scores Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery?

Joshua Mizels,Jake Connelly,Brook Martin,Brian Karamian,W Ryan Spiker,Brandon D Lawrence,Darrel S Brodke,Nicholas T Spina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005153

2024-09-05

Abstract:Study design: A retrospective review. Objective: The purpose of this study is to trend PROMIS PF scores following lumbar fusion surgery, and to investigate how the presence of functional comorbidities affects PROMIS PF scores. Additionally, we compare trends in PROMIS PF scores to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and to PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) scores. Summary of background data: National Institute of Health's (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) domain has been validated in spine surgery. However, little is known about how PROMIS-PF scores are affected by functional comorbidities and how these scores change in patients recovering from lumbar fusion surgery over time. In this study, we hypothesize that functional comorbidities negatively affect recovery. Methods: We retrospectively identified 1,893 patients who underwent thoracolumbar, lumbar, or lumbosacral fusion for degenerative conditions between 01/02/2014 and 01/07/2022. We summarized PF at 3-month intervals for 2 years following surgery between those with and without functional comorbidity, defined as the presence of congestive heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), or paraplegia. Mixed effects multivariable regressions were used to model between group trends in PF through 2 years post-operatively controlling for age, gender, indication, and surgical invasiveness. The minimally clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as 5+ point improvement from baseline in PF. Results: The cohort includes 1,224 (65%) patients without functional comorbidity and 669 (35%) with functional comorbidity. The mean age was 65.0 and Charlson index was 1.0 in the cohort without functional comorbidity compared to 65.4 and 3.8 in the cohort with functional comorbidity (P=0.552 and P<0.001 respectively). The groups were otherwise similar with respect to surgical invasiveness index, vertebral levels, and spine diagnosis (all P>0.05). At 24 months post operatively, the functional comorbidity group had a 2.5 point lower absolute PF score and a 1.3 point less improvement from baseline (P=0.012 and 0.190 respectively). 19.3% of patients in the functional comorbidity group achieved the MCID compared to 80.9% in patients without a functional comorbidity (P<0.001). Conclusion: Based on PROMIS PF scores, patients with functional comorbidities do not recover to the same extent and are less likely to achieve an MCID compared to patients without baseline functional comorbidities. PROMIS-PF can help benchmark patients along their recovery, and other metrics may be needed to better understand the recovery of patients with functional comorbidities.
Baseline Neck Disability Index and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Predict Postoperative Return to Normal in Cervical Spine Surgery

Gregory S Kazarian,Michael E Steinhaus,Sravisht Iyer,Drake LeBrun,Robert Cecere,Takashi Hirase,Francis Lovecchio,Todd J Albert,Darren Lebl,Darren Huang,Harvinder Sandhu,Bernard Rawlins,Frank Schwab,Virginie Lafage,Han Jo Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8653

2024-10-09

Abstract:Background: Recent studies assessing the importance of various preoperative factors on postoperative outcomes following spine surgery have uncovered several important variables that influence subjective and objective outcomes following cervical spine surgery, but it is still unclear which patients are most likely to benefit from operative management. Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to predict which patients achieve "normal" levels of pain and function after surgery. Study design: This was a prospective cohort study. Patient sample: This study included all adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery by 1 of 7 senior spine surgeons at our institution between 2016 and 2018. Of the 164 patients who were eligible for 6-month follow-up at the time that study data were collected, 139 had available follow-up data and were included in our analysis. Outcomes measures: Patients completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) as well as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference computer adaptive tests preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Methods: Patients who achieved postoperative patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for NDI (≤17) and the normative mean (50) for PROMIS were identified. The relationship between preoperative PROMs and the probability of achieving PASS and the normative mean was assessed. Results: One hundred thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria with diagnoses of myelopathy (n = 36), radiculopathy (n = 48), and myeloradiculopathy (n = 49). For NDI, a 1-point worsening in the preoperative score resulted in an OR of achieving PASS of 0.96 (P < 0.001) in the overall population. This association held true for patients with radiculopathy (OR 0.96; P = 0.022) but not myelopathy (OR 0.98; P = 0.35). For PROMIS PF, a 1-point improvement in the preoperative score resulted in an OR of achieving the normative mean of 1.10 (P < 0.001). This association held true for patients with radiculopathy (OR 1.14; P = 0.033) but did not reach statistical significance for patients with myelopathy (OR 1.03; P = 0.515). Conclusions: Preoperative PROMs can predict postoperative benefit for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, with worse baseline function associated with a lower likelihood of attaining PASS for NDI and the normative mean for PROMIS PF, especially for patients with radiculopathy. Clinical relevance: Baseline symptoms and function, including myelopathy or radiculopathy-dominant symptoms and preoperative PROMs, may predict postoperative outcomes.
P282. Predictors of time to achieve clinically significant improvements following lateral lumbar interbody fusion

John Sencaj,Gregory Snigur,Fatima Anwar,Andrea M. Roca,Vishrudh Vasudevan,Yousaf Ilyas,Alexandra Loya,Srinath Medakkar,Vincent Federico,Kern Singh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.405

IF: 4.297

2024-08-19

The Spine Journal

Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT As lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIF) are increasingly performed, our understanding of postoperative clinical trajectories are important in informing preoperative patient expectations. While minimum clinically important difference (MCID) rates are widely utilized in spine surgery literature, there is less published on how long it takes for patients to achieve MCID following LLIF. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the length of time it takes for patients to report MCID achievement for back pain, leg pain, disability, and physical function and evaluate predictors of time to achieve MCID. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This is a retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing elective LLIF with baseline and postoperative patient-reported outcomes reported. OUTCOME MEASURES Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), VAS-Back, VAS-Leg, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) METHODS Patients undergoing elective LLIF by the senior author with baseline and postoperative PROs recorded were retrospectively identified. Data on potential predictors of time to MCID achievement were gathered including demographics, comorbidities, diagnostic information, and baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs). MCID achievement rates for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale-Back (VAS-Back), VAS-Leg, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) were calculated at six-, twelve, 6 month- 1 year- and 2-year postoperative timepoints. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to determine the proportion of patients achieving MCID at each timepoint. A multivariate Cox regression determined predictors of time to MCID achievement. RESULTS One hundred and five patients were included in the analysis. The mean time to achieve MCID for PROMIS-PF was 44.7 weeks, for VAS-Back was 38.5 weeks, for VAS-Leg was 36.7 weeks and for ODI was 38.3 weeks. Worse baseline VAS-Back significantly predicted for earlier MCID achievement for VAS-Back (HR: 1.55), while diabetes was predictive of later MCID achievement (HR: 0.21). Higher body mass index and worse preoperative ODI predicted earlier MCID achievement for ODI (HR: 1.04-1.08), and higher VAS-Leg score, and two-level fusion were predictive of later MCID achievement for ODI, (HR:0.26-0.81). Worse preoperative VAS-Leg, isthmic spondylolisthesis, and three-level fusion were predictors of earlier achievement of MCID for VAS-Leg (HR: 1.27-6.47). Herniated nucleus pulposus and foraminal stenosis were early predictors (HR: 2.92-3.23) and workers' compensation was a late predictor of MCID attainment for PROMIS-PF (HR: 0.13). CONCLUSIONS Select demographic variables, comorbidities, spinal pathology, and preoperative PROs influenced the time it took for patients to report clinically significant improvements in pain, disability, and physical function scores. These findings can be used to prognosticate outcomes for patients undergoing LLIF and inform patient expectations of postoperative recovery. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
Choanal polyps: one entity, one surgical approach?

A. Lopatin,V. Bykova,G. Piskunov

1997-06-01

Abstract:Twenty consecutive patients (ten women and ten men; 14 - 66 years old) operated on from September 1993 to November 1995 were included in this study. The only inclusion criterion was a large polyp protruding from the nasal cavity into the nasopharynx. CT, MRI and endoscopic sinus surgery identified sites of choanal polyp (CP) origin as follows: maxillary sinus (n = 11), sphenoid sinus (n = 3), posterior ethmoids (n = 4), anterior ethmoids (n = 1), and lateral aspect of the head of the middle turbinate (n = 1). Light microscopy demonstrated no correlation between the site of CP attachment and its morphological appearance, but in two cases of CP (one originating from the sphenoid sinus and the other form the middle turbinate) morphological examination confirmed the diagnosis of inverted papilloma. Long-term follow-up in 15 patients revealed no cases of recurrence. The results obtained allow us to define three types of CP: antrochoanal, sphenochoanal, and ethmochoanal. In case of an unusual site of CP origin, the diagnosis of inverted papilloma should be considered.
Comparison of sleep improvement in patients undergoing lumbar spine decompression

Ryan McNassor,Jennifer Yang,Michael D Shost,Deborah L Benzil,Michael D. Shost,Deborah L. Benzil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.11.spine23704

2024-02-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE Degenerative spine conditions affect many people each year. These conditions have been shown to negatively impact pain, function, and patient quality of life (QOL), which often require surgical intervention. It is understood that sleep plays an important role in all of these factors. However, the relationship between sleep disruption and lumbar surgery is not well understood. The objective of this study was to use a large database to understand the relationship between sleep quality and lumbar spine surgery outcomes. METHODS The surgical database of the authors’ institute was used to identify all patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spine disease from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2021. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sleep disturbance scores were collected, and only patients with both pre- and postoperative scores were included. Additional measures related to disability, pain, and depression were also obtained. Chart review was performed to collect patient demographics, health risk factors, and information related to sleep disturbances such as sleep medication usage and prior sleep condition diagnosis. RESULTS The study had 674 patients who met the criteria. At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, there was a significant decrease in sleep disruption scores (i.e., sleep improvement), although these decreases were not greater than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). When stratified based on preoperative sleep quality, patients with poor preoperative scores (PROMIS sleep disruption > 63.04) showed a significant decrease in sleep disruption by 8.17 at 3 months, 7.99 at 6 months, and 7.21 at 12 months. All of these decreases were greater than the sleep disruption MCID of 6.5. Multivariate analysis showed high preoperative sleep disruption and improvement in PROMIS physical health were most associated with decreased postoperative sleep disruption at all postoperative time points. CONCLUSIONS In patients with degenerative spine conditions, lumbar spine surgery offers improvement in sleep disruption for all patients. Those with poor preoperative sleep quality are more likely to see clinical improvement in their sleep disruption.

surgery,clinical neurology
Which Domains of the ODI Best Predict Change in Physical Function in Patients After Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis?

Hamadi A. Murphy,Eugene Warnick,Richard McEntee,Kristen Nicholson,Douglas A. Hollern,Christie Stawicki,Daniel Tarazona,Gregory D. Schroeder,Barrett I. Woods,Mark F. Kurd,Jeffrey A. Rihn,Greg D. Anderson,Christopher K. Kepler,Alan S. Hilibrand,Alexander R. Vaccaro,Kris E. Radcliff,Vaccaro, Alexander R.,Kurd, Mark F.,Nicholson, Kristen,Woods, Barrett I.,Hollern, Douglas A.,Radcliff, Kris E.,Rihn, Jeffrey A.,McEntee, Richard,Kepler, Christopher K.,Warnick, Eugene,Murphy, Hamadi A.,Schroeder, Gregory D.,Tarazona, Daniel,Stawicki, Christie,Hilibrand, Alan S.,Anderson, Greg D.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002459

IF: 3.241

2019-10-03

Spine

Abstract:Study Design. A retrospective review. Objective. The purpose of this study is to determine the differential improvement of the various individual items of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and to determine their relationship to other measures of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL). Summary of Background Data. The ODI is an easily scored, common, 10-item questionnaire about symptoms relevant to lumbar spine pathology. It is not clear if all of the items can be reliably applied to spine surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine the differential improvement of the various individual items of the ODI and to determine their relationship to other measures of HRQOL. Methods. Analysis of a prospective registry of patients treated at an academic medical center was undertaken. At baseline, standardized outcome measures including ODI and SF12 PCS were collected on all patients undergoing elective fusion surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Multiple linear regressions were performed using change in SF12 PCS as the dependent variable and change in ODI components as the independent variables. Results. Baseline and 1-year follow-up data were collected on 196 patients (mean age 60.4 years). There were statistically significant differences in improvement among ODI items. Surprisingly, the most improvement after surgery was noted in the standing, sex life, and social life domains. The least improvement was noted in the personal care, sleeping, and sitting domains. Linear regression for change in ODI components versus change in SF-12 PCS revealed a significant correlation (R2 = 0.353, P ≤ 0.001). The only retained domains in the final model were change in lifting, standing, and traveling as predictors for ΔPCS. Conclusion. All domains of the ODI do not improve equally after surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Some of the domains that improve most (e.g., sex life) have no discernible relationship to the known pathophysiology of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Based upon these results, we conclude that the item bank and composite scoring of the ODI are inappropriate for evaluating quality of life in studies of surgically treated degenerative spondylolisthesis patients. Level of Evidence: 3

clinical neurology,orthopedics

Proceedings of the 8th European Congress of Neurosurgery Barcelona, September 6–11, 1987

One Year Patient Reported Outcomes After Single-Level Lumbar Fusion at Orthopedic Specialty Hospital Compared to Tertiary Referral Center

Suppression of behavior by timeout punishment when suppression results in loss of positive reinforcement.

The correlation between bone mineral density and surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

Impact of Preoperative Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Lumbar Fusion

How do spinopelvic parameters influence patient-reported outcome measurements after lumbar decompression?

Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery

Targeting CDK9: a promising therapeutic opportunity in prostate cancer.

P241. Comparison of age differences in clinical outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy

The disaggregation of the oswestry disability index in patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

277 Clinical Outcome With and Without Adherence to Evidence-based Medicine Guidelines for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Fusion Patients

Impact of Depression on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Lumbar Spine Decompression

Patient Reported Physical and Mental Health Outcomes Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion versus Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement

Mental Health Rather than Mental Disorders as a Predictor of Immediate Postoperative Recovery Following Elective Lumbar Fusion: Using the PROMIS-10 Global Mental Health T-Score

Physical functioning in the lumbar spinal surgery population: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of outcome measures and measurement properties of the physical measures

How Do Functional Comorbidities Affect PROMIS-PF Scores Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery?

Baseline Neck Disability Index and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Predict Postoperative Return to Normal in Cervical Spine Surgery

P282. Predictors of time to achieve clinically significant improvements following lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Choanal polyps: one entity, one surgical approach?

Comparison of sleep improvement in patients undergoing lumbar spine decompression

Which Domains of the ODI Best Predict Change in Physical Function in Patients After Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis?