Effect of brolucizumab and aflibercept on the maximum thickness of pigment epithelial detachments and sub-RPE fluid in HAWK and HARRIER

Arshad M Khanani,Srinivas R Sadda,David Sarraf,Ramin Tadayoni,David T Wong,Anne-Sophie Kempf,Insaf Saffar,Kinfe Michael Gedif,Andrew Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2024.07.012
2024-07-19
Abstract:Objective: To compare the efficacy of brolucizumab and aflibercept treatment in reducing maximum thickness of pigment epithelial detachments (PED) and sub-retinal pigment epithelium (sub-RPE) fluid in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the HAWK and HARRIER studies. Design: HAWK and HARRIER were 96-week, prospective, randomized, double-masked, controlled, multicenter studies SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: 1,775 patients across 11 countries were included in the HAWK study and 1,048 patients across 29 countries were included in the HARRIER study. Method and interventions: After three monthly loading doses, brolucizumab-treated eyes received injections every 12 weeks (q12w) or q8w if disease activity (DA) was detected. Aflibercept-treated eyes received fixed q8w dosing. Main outcomes measures: Maximum thickness of PED and sub-RPE fluid across the macula were assessed at baseline through Week 96 in the brolucizumab- and aflibercept-treated patients, and in the patient subgroups with DA at Week 16 (matched in terms of injection number and treatment interval). Results: At Week 96, there were greater mean percentage reductions from baseline in maximum thickness of both PED and sub-RPE fluid in brolucizumab-treated patients versus aflibercept-treated patients (PED: 19.7% [n=336] vs 11.9% [n=335] in HAWK; 29.5% [n=364] vs 18.3% [n=361] in HARRIER. Sub-RPE fluid: 75.4% vs 57.3% in HAWK; 86.0% vs 76.3% in HARRIER). A similar trend in mean percentage reductions was observed in patients with DA at Week 16. Conclusions: This analysis shows that brolucizumab achieved greater reductions in PED and sub-RPE fluid thickness than aflibercept in HAWK and HARRIER.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?