Abstract:Aims: Heart failure is a serious condition that often goes undiagnosed in primary care due to the lack of reliable diagnostic tools and the similarity of its symptoms with other diseases. Non-invasive monitoring of heart rate variability (HRV), which reflects the activity of the autonomic nervous system, could offer a novel and accurate way to detect and manage heart failure patients. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of using machine learning techniques on HRV data as a non-invasive biomarker to classify healthy adults and those with heart failure. Methods and results: We used digitized electrocardiogram recordings from 54 adults with normal sinus rhythm and 44 adults categorized into New York Heart Association classes 1, 2, and 3, suffering from congestive heart failure. All recordings were sourced from the PhysioNet database. Following data pre-processing, we performed time-domain HRV analysis on all individual recordings, including root mean square of the successive difference in adjacent RR interval (RRi) (RMSSD), the standard deviation of RRi (SDNN, the NN stands for natural or sinus intervals), the standard deviation of the successive differences between successive RRi (SDSD), the number or percentage of RRi longer than 50 ms (NN50 and pNN50), and the average value of RRi [mean RR interval (mRRi)]. In our experimental classification performance evaluation, on the computed HRV parameters, we optimized hyperparameters and performed five-fold cross-validation using four machine learning classification algorithms: support vector machine, k-nearest neighbour (KNN), naïve Bayes, and decision tree (DT). We evaluated the prediction accuracy of these models using performance criteria, namely, precision, recall, specificity, F1 score, and overall accuracy. For added insight, we also presented receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values. The overall best performance accuracy of 77% was achieved when KNN and DT were trained on computed HRV parameters with a 5 min time window. KNN obtained an AUC of 0.77, while DT attained 0.78. Additionally, in the classification of severe congestive heart failure, KNN and DT had the best accuracy of 91%, with KNN achieving an AUC of 0.88 and DT obtaining 0.92. Conclusions: The results show that HRV can accurately predict severe congestive heart failure. The findings of this study could inform the use of machine learning approaches on non-invasive HRV, to screen congestive heart failure individuals in primary care.

Prognosis value of heart rate variability measured by Camera HRV application in patients after acute myocardial infarction

Heart Rate Variability in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the HeaRt-V-AMI Single-Center Cohort Study

Prognostic Value of Ultra-Short Heart Rate Variability Measures Obtained from Electrocardiogram Recordings of Hospitalized Patients Diagnosed with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Measuring Heart Rate Variability in Patients Admitted with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction for the Prediction of Subsequent Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review

Heart Rate Variability and Global Longitudinal Strain for Prognostic Evaluation and Recovery Assessment in Conservatively Managed Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients

Survival Predictors of Heart Rate Variability After Myocardial Infarction With and Without Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Study on the Sports and HRV

The application value of 24 h Holter monitoring indices in predicting MACEs outside the hospital within three years after PCI in patients with STEMI

P3833Low heart rate variability is associated with future arrhythmic events in hypertension

Time-domain heart rate variability features for automatic congestive heart failure prediction

Can Heart Rate Variability Parameters Be A Biomarker For Predicting Motor Function Prognosis In Patients With Chronic Stroke?

Home Monitoring of Heart Rate as a Predictor of Imminent Cardiovascular Events

Which indices of heart rate variability are the best predictors of mortality after acute myocardial infarction? Meta-analysis of observational studies

Heart rate variability as predictive factor for sudden cardiac death

Extraction of Heart Rate Variability from Smartphone Photoplethysmograms.

The role of heart rate variability, heart rate turbulence, and deceleration capacity in predicting cause-specific mortality in chronic heart failure

Using heart rate variability to develop a predictive model for post‐operative cardiovascular complications following major abdominal surgery: A pilot study

Autonomic Nerve Function Predicts Risk of Early Death after Discharge in Acute Medical Disease

Prognostic value of heart rate variability for risk of serious adverse events in continuously monitored hospital patients

Performance of heart rate adjusted heart rate variability for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death

Relationship between ultra-short heart rate variability and short-term mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients