Abstract:Abdullah A Alrasheed, 1, 2 Abdulrahman M Alammar 3 1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2 King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 3 King Saud University, King Saud University Medical City, Family and Community Medicine department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Correspondence: Abdullah A Alrasheed, Email Background: CT scan utilizes ionizing radiation poses a danger to the patient's health. Thus, telling the patient about ionizing radiation would be critical in promoting shared decision-making and improving patient-doctor communication. However, few studies have examined this topic broadly. Objective: The study was conducted to identify the frequency of physicians informing patients about the radiation risk before ordering a CT scan, as well as to examine the association between patients' demographic characteristics and their awareness of the radiation risks associated with CT scans. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 387 patients who had undergone CT scans at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected via phone interviews using a structured questionnaire. Chi-squared tests were employed to assess associations between patients' demographic characteristics and their awareness of CT scan radiation risks. Results: When examining knowledge, 58% of patients knew that CT involves harmful radiation. This knowledge was significantly associated with higher education level and previous experience with CT scans. Regarding doctors' practice of providing information to patients about the scan, 344 (88.9%) patients indicated that their doctor had explained to them why they needed the scan. Only 28 (7.2%) patients stated that their doctor had mentioned the amount of radiation, and 74 (19.1%) patients indicated that doctors mentioned the risks associated with the radiation of the scan. Almost all patients (96.9%) preferred to be told about why they needed a CT scan. Conclusion: The vast majority of patients who underwent CT scans did not receive enough information about the harm of the scans. However, most of them preferred to know about this harm. Keywords: CT radiation exposure, patient preferences, informed consent, doctor-patient communication, radiation risks, cross-sectional study Computed tomography (CT) is an important radiological imaging technology and involves a series of radiographic projections that are combined to obtain computer-generated cross-sectional images. Since its invention in 1970, CT has worked wonders in the field of medicine by improving diagnoses, treatment therapies, and surgical procedures. 1 CT machines are widely available and offer accurate diagnosis to physicians in minutes. In addition, CT scans have reduced the number of emergency surgeries, ICU admissions, and length of hospital stay. 1,2 Millions of CT scans are performed worldwide every year. 3 In just the USA and UK, more than 70 million and 5 million CT scans are performed every year, respectively. 4 Although CT scans have revolutionized the diagnostic department of medicine, they raise important public concerns about exposure to ionizing radiation, which could lead to harmful biological effects such as malignancy. It has been reported that a CT coronary angiogram exposes the breasts and lungs to radiation levels equivalent to 15 mammography studies and 711 X-rays of the chest, respectively. 5 CT scans deliver 50–1000 times more radiation to the human body than a conventional X-ray, contributing to about 50% of all medical radiation. 6 The utilization of CT scans is increasing day by day, exposing more and more people to the risk of ionizing radiation. Growing concern about long-term outcomes of ionizing radiation, such as malignancy, warrants the application of fundamental protection rules in health care systems, such as justification, optimization, and dose limitation of radiological imaging techniques. 7 Justification of CT scans is of prime importance on the part of referring physician and radiologist as they must weigh the benefits of the imaging against the possible risks of radiation. In this context, CT scans can be replaced by non-radiating modalities, such as ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) where possible. Similarly, optimization of CT scan guidelines and protocols could reduce unnecessary radiation exposure. Recent studies, such as those conducted by Hyde et al in Australia, have highlighted significant gaps in the provision of preparatory information to patients undergoing medical imaging procedures. 8 These studie -Abstract Truncated-

What proportion of CT scan patients are alive or deceased after 10 years?

Incidence and Mortality Life-Attributable Risks for Patients Subjected to Recurrent CT Examinations and Cumulative Effective Dose Exceeding 100 mSv

Evaluation of risks of cardiovascular disease from radiation exposure linked to computed tomography scans in the UK

Evaluation of radiation dose and radiation-induced cancer risk associated with routine CT scan examinations

Survey on the distribution of medical imaging frequencies and dose levels for CT examinations in a comprehensive hospital in Shanghai

Cumulative effective dose from recurrent CT examinations in Europe: proposal for clinical guidance based on an ESR EuroSafe Imaging survey

SU-D-9A-07: Imaging Dose and Cancer Risk in Image-Guided Radiotherapy of Cancers

Radiation Safety: Radiation Dosimetry and CT Dose Reduction Techniques

Brain cancer after radiation exposure from CT examinations of children and young adults: results from the EPI-CT cohort study

Coronary CT Angiography Radiation Dose Trends: A 10-Year Analysis to Develop Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels

Risk of hematological malignancies from CT radiation exposure in children, adolescents and young adults

Radiation protection issues in dynamic contrast-enhanced (perfusion) computed tomography

Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI

Age and Size Dependent Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 48 Types of CT Examinations: a Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study of One Million CT Examinations in China

Accounting for Radiation Exposure from Previous CT Exams While Deciding on the Next Exam: What Do Referring Clinicians Think?

Exploring Patient Preferences for Information About CT Radiation Exposure: Bridging the Gap Between Patient Preference and Physician Practice

Characterizing imaging radiation risk in a population of 8918 patients with recurrent imaging for a better effective dose

SU-E-J-10: Imaging Dose and Cancer Risk in Image-Guided Radiotherapy of Cancers

Research on the Radiation Doses to Adults Receiving from Main Types of Medical X-ray CT Examinations

Effect of cumulative radiation exposure from Coronary catheterization on lung cancer mortality

Can the Coronary Artery Calcium Score Scan Reduce the Radiation Dose in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography?