Abstract:Moving and holding still have been posited to be under separate control regimes for both eye and arm movements. The paretic arm after stroke exhibits different abnormalities during rest vs. movement, providing an opportunity to ask whether control of these behaviors is independently affected in stroke. Here, we quantified resting postural abnormalities in stroke patients by measuring their biases in force production as they held their hand still in various locations in a planar workspace, and then assessed the influence of these resting force biases on reaching in the same workspace. We found that patients had marked resting force biases at each location, even when the arm was supported. However, these biases did not transfer to arm-supported planar reaching movements: not during initial acceleration, not in response to mid-trajectory perturbations, and not during deceleration to a stop. Rather, the abnormal resting forces only appeared to switch on after a movement had fully stopped. These findings suggest that moving and holding are functionally separable modes of control. At the same time, we found that the resting biases mirrored characteristics of abnormal synergies during movement: they markedly decreased when arm support was provided; they were higher in more distal positions which require breaking out of flexion; and they scaled with the Fugl-Meyer score for the upper extremity (a measure of intrusion of abnormal synergies during active movement). These three shared features suggest a common mechanism for resting biases and abnormal synergies, which appears to be a contradiction given the functional separation of moving and holding observed in the same patients. To resolve this paradox, we propose a conceptual model that predicts a breakdown in the functional separation between reaching and holding when patients move in the absence of weight support. This conceptual model posits that synergies are the behavioral manifestation of a spillover of posture into movement. Mapping these functional systems onto anatomical and physiological details of lesioned substrate after stroke may provide implementation-level insight into how normal arm motor control is assembled.

Distribution of control during bimanual movement and stabilization

Handy divisions: Hand-specific specialization of prehensile control in bimanual tasks

Bimanual Coordination and Influences of Cognitive Factors

Different Control Strategies Drive Interlimb Differences in Performance and Adaptation during Reaching Movements in Novel Dynamics

Bilateral Asymmetry of Hand Force Production in Dynamic Physically-Coupled Tasks

Neuronal Representation of Bimanual Arm Motor Imagery in the Motor Cortex of a Tetraplegia Human, a Pilot Study.

Motor control and cerebral hemispheric specialization in highly qualified judo wrestlers

Lateralized distribution of motor areas involved in voluntary movement]

Bimanual proprioception: are two hands better than one?

Asymmetrical Mass Object Manipulations During Dominant and Non-dominant Precision Grip

Dexterous Manipulation Control of a Bionic Prosthesis in Cooperation with Human Upper Limbs

Separating the control of moving and holding in post-stroke arm paresis

Left/Right Brain, human motor control and the implications for robotics

The control of the arm's equilibrium position

Goal conceptualization has distinct effects on spatial and temporal bimanual coordination after left- and right- hemisphere stroke

Neural representation in M1 and S1 cortex of bilateral hand actions during prehension

Stabilize to Act: Learning to Coordinate for Bimanual Manipulation

Bimanual force control strategies in chronic stroke: finger extension versus power grip

Differences in Muscle Power Between the Dominant and Nondominant Upper Limbs of Baseball Players

Brain-Actuated Control of Dual-Arm Robot Manipulation With Relative Motion

Spinal and cortical premotor control of primate dexterous hand movements