[Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antigens (ANCA)-associated vasculitis: Current therapeutics]

Loïc Guillevin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio/2024001
Abstract:ANCA-associated vasculitis brings together three diseases, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. This group of diseases has benefited over the last 3 decades from major therapeutic advances both in terms of therapeutic strategies and availability of new drugs, mainly for targeted therapies. Treatments, whether conventional or not, include an induction phase followed by a maintenance phase. Induction treatment today poses few problems. It is essentially based on the combination of corticosteroids and rituximab or cyclophosphamide. Remission is achieved in less than 6 months and maintenance treatment, preventing relapses, is then started. We showed that the best maintenance treatment was rituximab, surpassing the efficacy of methotrexate or azathioprine. During this phase, corticosteroid therapy is stopped or given at a very small dose. In Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GEPA), the strategy is slightly different and there is a lack of prospective trials to demonstrate the benefits of rituximab or mepolizumab (anti-IL5) in inducing remission. Regarding maintenance treatment, prolonged corticosteroid therapy (orally and/or inhaled) is often necessary to control asthmatic disease. Only mepolizumab has shown its ability to prevent relapses and reduce the dose of corticosteroids controlling asthma. The current questions posed by maintenance treatment are its duration which could be variable and adapted to the risk of relapse and the risks induced by prolonged immunosuppression, particularly infectious.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?