The effect of Ding's screws and tension band wiring for treatment of olecranon fractures: a biomechanical study

Yong Zhao,Hongbo Tian,Nuo Yin,Li Du,Mingmang Pan,Liang Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60264-7
IF: 4.6
2024-05-03
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Although tension band wiring (TBW) is popular and recommended by the AO group, the high rate of complications such as skin irritation and migration of the K-wires cannot be ignored. Ding's screw tension band wiring (DSTBW) is a new TBW technique that has shown positive results in the treatment of other fracture types. The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of DSTBW in the treatment of olecranon fractures by biomechanical testing. We conducted a Synbone biomechanical model by using three fixation methods: DSTBW, intramedullary screw and tension band wiring (IM-TBW), and K-wire TBW, were simulated to fix the olecranon fractures. We compared the mechanical stability of DSTBW, IM-TBW, and TBW in the Mayo Type IIA olecranon fracture Synbone model using a single cycle loading to failure protocol or pullout force. During biomechanical testing, the average fracture gap measurements were recorded at varying flexion angles in three different groups: TBW, IM-TBW, and DSTBW. The TBW group exhibited measurements of 0.982 mm, 0.380 mm, 0.613 mm, and 1.285 mm at flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° respectively. The IM-TBW group displayed average fracture gap measurements of 0.953 mm, 0.366 mm, 0.588 mm, and 1.240 mm at each of the corresponding flexion angles. The DSTBW group showed average fracture gap measurements of 0.933 mm, 0.358 mm, 0.543 mm, and 1.106 mm at the same flexion angles. No specimen failed in each group during the cyclic loading phase. Compared with the IM-TBW and TBW groups, the DSTBW group showed significant differences in 60° and 90° flexion angles. The mean maximum failure load was 1229.1 ± 110.0 N in the DSTBW group, 990.3 ± 40.7 N in the IM-TBW group, and 833.1 ± 68.7 N in the TBW group. There was significant difference between each groups ( p < 0.001).The average maximum pullout strength for TBW was measured at 57.6 ± 5.1 N, 480.3 ± 39.5 N for IM-TBW, and 1324.0 ± 43.8 N for DSTBW. The difference between maximum pullout strength of both methods was significant to p < 0.0001. DSTBW fixation provides more stability than IM-TBW and TBW fixation models for olecranon fractures.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the stability of Ding's screw tension - band wiring (DSTBW) in the treatment of olecranon fractures. By comparing it with the traditional tension - band wiring (TBW) and intramedullary screw tension - band wiring (IM - TBW), it is determined whether DSTBW can provide better biomechanical stability and reduce the incidence of complications. Specifically, the paper explores this problem through the following points: 1. **Research Background**: - Although the tension - band wiring (TBW) is widely recommended for the treatment of olecranon fractures, its complications such as skin irritation and Kirschner wire displacement are relatively common. - Ding's screw tension - band wiring (DSTBW) is a new TBW technique and has shown good results in other types of fractures. 2. **Research Objectives**: - Evaluate the stability of DSTBW in the treatment of olecranon fractures through biomechanical tests. - Compare the mechanical stabilities of DSTBW, IM - TBW and traditional TBW in the Mayo Type IIA olecranon fracture model. 3. **Research Methods**: - Use the Synbone model to simulate three fixation methods: DSTBW, IM - TBW and traditional TBW. - Compare the mechanical stabilities of different fixation methods through single - cycle loading - to - failure tests or pull - out force tests. - Record the fracture gap measurements at different flexion angles, as well as the maximum failure load and the maximum pull - out strength. 4. **Research Results**: - At 60° and 90° flexion angles, the fracture gaps in the DSTBW group were significantly smaller than those in the IM - TBW and TBW groups. - The maximum failure load in the DSTBW group (1229.1 ± 110.0 N) was significantly higher than that in the IM - TBW group (990.3 ± 40.7 N) and the TBW group (833.1 ± 68.7 N). - The maximum pull - out strength in the DSTBW group (1324.0 ± 43.8 N) was significantly higher than that in the IM - TBW group (480.3 ± 39.5 N) and the TBW group (57.6 ± 5.1 N). 5. **Conclusion**: - DSTBW provides higher stability than IM - TBW and TBW in the treatment of olecranon fractures and reduces the risk of internal fixation failure. Through these research results, the paper aims to prove the superiority of DSTBW in the treatment of olecranon fractures and provide a scientific basis for clinical applications.