Abstract:Purpose: 1) To assess the possible relationship between the morphology of femur or acetabulum and the gluteus medius pathology. 2) To analyze the outcome of isolated arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) for patients with radiographic gluteus medius tear. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of FAI patients who underwent arthroscopy between January 2016 to December 2019. Demographic data, such as sex, age, body mass index (BMI), symptom duration, were collected. Radiographic parameters, including alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle (LCEa), femur neck-shaft angle (NSa), gluteus medius pathology, were also collected. Exclusion criteria were previous hip conditions, such as osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade > 1), rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, snapping hip, previous surgery on the ipsilateral hip, or incomplete data. We followed up these patients with radiographic gluteus medius tear. No surgical procedure for gluteus medius was performed. The minimum follow-up period was 13 months. Patient-reported outcomes, such as modified Harris Hip score (mHHS), visual analog scale (VAS), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), as well as physical examination data, including tenderness at the greater trochanter, abductor weakness, limping gait, and positive Trendelenburg sign or test, were gathered preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: A total of 569 hips (314, 55.2% male) were collected eventually, with a mean age of 36.5 ± 10.4 years (range: 13.0 to ∼65.0). Gluteus medius pathology was found in 209 (36.7%) hips, including 41 (7.2%) partial-thickness tears and 10 (1.8%) complete tears. The NSa of the normal, tendinosis, partial tear, and complete tear groups was 133.8 ± 4.7°, 130.6 ± 3.8°, 129.4 ± 3.9°, and 129.6 ± 3.4°, respectively (P < .001). The LCEa of each group was 31.7 ± 35.7°, 33.3 ± 6.5°, 34.9 ± 6.8°, and 33.7 ± 8.1°, respectively (P = .004). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, lower NSa and higher LCEa were identified as risk factors for developing gluteus medius pathology (P < .001). For patients with gluteus medius tear, two cases were lost to follow-up and two cases had incomplete data. The mean follow-up period of the remaining 47 hips was 29.5 ± 12.9 (range: 13 to 59) months. The mHHS improved from 54.8 ± 19.1 to 90.1 ± 6.7 points (P < .001), and VAS decreased from 6.8 ± 1.6 to 3.0 ± 1.6 points (P < .001). Forty-two cases met the threshold of PASS, with a rate of 89%. The abductor strength increased from 4.1 ± 1.00 to 4.6 ± .7 grades (P = .002). However, for patients with a completely torn gluteus medius, improvement of abductor strength was not significant statistically (3.4 ± .9 to 3.9 ± .9, P = .234). Conclusion: There was a correlation between lower NSa/higher LCEa and gluteus medius pathology. Isolated arthroscopic treatment of FAI for patients with radiographic gluteus medius tear can gain satisfactory patient-reported outcomes. Level of evidence: Therapeutic case series, IV.

Editorial Commentary: Endoscopic and Open Techniques Can Achieve Successful Outcomes With Hip Abductor Tendon Repair but Retracted Tears With High-Grade Fatty Atrophy May Benefit From an Open Approach

Editorial Commentary: Endoscopic Hip Abductor Repair Results in Excellent Outcomes in Challenging Patients: Surgical Indications Require Additional Clarification

Editorial Commentary: Long-Term Follow-up After Endoscopic Gluteal Repair Plus Hip Arthroscopy Shows Durable Results Using Validated Patient-Reported Outcome Scores That Largely Exceed the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State

Endoscopic Repair of Abductor Tendon Tears Results in Variable Patient Reported Outcomes and Generally Good to Excellent Results

Endoscopic Repair of Hip Abductor Tendon Tears: A Case Report

Editorial Commentary: Muscle Advancement, Footprint Medialization, and Repair Medialization Could Improve Healing and Clinical Outcomes of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears as a Result of Low-Tension Repair

Rehabilitation After Gluteus Medius and Minimus Treatment

Endoscopic Treatment of Gluteus Medius Tears: A Review

Endoscopic treatment of gluteus medius tendon tear

Double Row Hip Abductor Reconstruction with Fasciae Latae Transfer for Severe Trendelenburg after Hip Arthroplasty

Outcomes of Isolated Endoscopic Gluteal Tendon Repair Compared With Concomitant Endoscopic Gluteal Tendon Repair and Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsular Reconstruction with Achilles Allograft Can Reverse Pseudoparalysis While Improving Functional Patient Outcomes

Rotator cuff problem of the hip

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Reveals Superior Gluteus Medius Muscle Vitality After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Versus Lateral Surgical Approach

Single-row, double-row, and transosseous equivalent techniques for isolated supraspinatus tendon tears with minimal atrophy: A retrospective comparative outcome and radiographic analysis at minimum 2-year followup

Editorial Commentary: Decreased Superior Capsular Reconstruction Postoperative Graft Volume Is More Common in Patients With Advanced Rotator Cuff Arthropathy and Is Associated With Inferior Outcome: Cause or Effect?

Muscle Advancement During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair as a Treatment Option for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Editorial Commentary: Bridging Graft Techniques Improve Short-Term Outcomes for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear Repair

What Abductor Repair Technique Provides the Best Functional Outcomes After Proximal Femur Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Oncologic Indications? A Systematic Review

Editorial Commentary: Treatment of Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Must Be Based on Individual Patient Indications: Bridging Repair Allows Low-Tension Repair of Irreparable Tears

Hip Gluteus Medius Tears Are Associated With Lower Femoral Neck-Shaft Angles and Higher Acetabular Center-Edge Angles