Abstract:Abstract Background: Metronomic chemotherapy, defined as frequent administration of. chemotherapeutic agents at a non-toxic dose without extended rest periods, can overcome drug resistance and achieve disease control with reduced toxicity compared to conventional chemotherapy in maximum tolerated dose by shifting the therapeutic target from tumor cells to tumor endothelial cells. Some of the previous studies of oral vinorelbine have shown good data in efficacy and safety in advanced breast cancer. Methods: The multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized phase 2 study (NCT03854617) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral metronomic vinorelbine in 13 hospitals in China. Eligible HER2-negative breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline or taxane regimens were randomized (1:1) to receive metronomic dosage of oral vinorelbine (50mg/3 times a week) or conventional dosage of oral vinorelbine (60mg/m2 weekly for cycle 1 and 80mg/m2 weekly for subsequent cycles in the absence of grade 3 or 4 toxicity) for first-line/second-line chemotherapy. The primary end point was Disease Control Rate (DCR) and a non-inferiority margin of 6% was defined for DCR. Patient characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety/adverse events (AEs) were among the parameters assessed. The expression of 27 cytokines was profiled longitudinally in these patients at baseline and at regular intervals during therapy. Results: Between February 2019 and September 2020, a total of 171 patients were enrolled and randomized to metronomic dosage group (86 patients) and conventional dosage group (85 patients). 136 patients were hormone receptor(HR)positive and 117 patients (68.4%) had visceral metastases. The DCR was 59.3% (95% CI:48.17% to 69.78%) in the metronomic dosage group and 67.1% (95% CI:56.02% to 76.87%) in the conventional dosage group. Whereas, the 18-month survival rate was higher in the metronomic dosage group than that in the conventional dosage group (68.7% vs 43.0%).The median progression-free survival in the metronomic dosage group was 2.8 months (95% CI:1.40 to 3.50) compared with 4.1 months (95% CI:2.80 to 6.20) in the conventional dosage group. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were significantly less frequent in patients in the metronomic dosage group than patients in the conventional dosage group (19.8% vs 48.2%, P<0.001). By comparing the variation of cytokine profiles at baseline and after 6-week treatment in 122 patients, multilevel partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) suggested the variation of VEGF, MIP-1α, IL-1B, IL-17, MCP-1, IL-13, PDGF-BB, IL-4 and RANTES were significantly different between the metronomic dosage group and the conventional dosage group during the treatment (all VIP values > 1.2). As for the patients in the metronomic dosage group, GM-CSF, MCP-1, TNF-α, IL-10, IL-13 and MIP-1α were potential biomarkers between the response patients and non-response patients (all VIP values > 1.2). Conclusions: Oral metronomic vinorelbine decreased the risk of severe toxicity significantly and may be an option for older patients and for those intolerable to standard chemotherapy with proper predictive biomarkers, though this study couldn’t prove to show the non-inferiority of oral metronomic vinorelbine for first-line or second-line chemotherapy previously treated with anthracycline or taxane in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Citation Format: Fei Ma, Xinlan Liu, Yanxia Shi, Xiuwen Guan, Huihui Li, Xiaojia Wang, Yuee Teng, Qiang Liu, Jin Yang, Man Li, Qingyuan Zhang, Weihong Zhao, Caiwen Du, Lili Sheng, Binghe Xu. A randomized phase II study investigating oral metronomic vinorelbine versus conventional dosage of vinorelbine in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline or taxane:clinical results and biomarker analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-16-02.

Metronomic chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1 in metastatic breast cancer: a Bayesian adaptive randomized phase 2 trial

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Plus Nab-Paclitaxel with or Without Bevacizumab As Second-Line Therapy or Beyond for Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer.

Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Docetaxel with or Without Low-Dose Metronomic Oral Cyclophosphamide in First-Line Treatment of Non-Triple-negative Advanced Breast Cancer.

Metronomic Paclitaxel Improves the Efficacy of PD-1 Monoclonal Antibodies in Breast Cancer by Transforming the Tumor Immune Microenvironment.

Dual‑directional effect of vinorelbine combined with cisplatin or fluorouracil on tumor growth and metastasis in metronomic chemotherapy in breast cancer

Combination Therapy of Pyrotinib and Metronomic Vinorelbine in HER2+ Advanced Breast Cancer After Trastuzumab Failure (PROVE): A Prospective Phase 2 Study

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ipilimumab and nivolumab combined with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized phase 2b trial

A Phase II Trial Combining SHR-1316, Bevacizumab, and Cisplatin/carboplatin in Patients with TNBC with Active Brain Metastases.

Abstract P1-16-02: A randomized phase II study investigating oral metronomic vinorelbine versus conventional dosage of vinorelbine in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline or taxane:clinical results and biomarker analysis

Efficacy and safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in randomized clinical trials among triple-negative breast cancer

Efficacy And Safety Of Anti-Pd-1/ Pd-L1 Monotherapy For Metastatic Breast Cancer: Clinical Evidence

A phase Ib, open-label, multi-cohort study of metronomic capecitabine plus camrelizumab for treatment of refractory solid tumor: McCrest trial.

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitors Plus Metronomic Oral Vinorelbine in Elderly Pre-Treated Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer.

Immune-checkpoint Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy Versus Conventional Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of three randomised trials

Clinical and molecular characterization of the vinorelbine-platinum chemotherapeutic regimen in HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer

Combined Anti-Pd-1, HDAC Inhibitor and Anti-Vegf for MSS/pMMR Colorectal Cancer: a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

Abstract PD1-03: A multicenter phase II study evaluating the efficacy of nivolumab plus paclitaxel plus bevacizumab triple-combination therapy as a first-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: WJOG9917B NEWBEAT trial

Metronomic capecitabine combined with aromatase inhibitors for new chemoendocrine treatment of advanced breast cancer: a phase II clinical trial

Toripalimab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial