Abstract:Background Dual blockade of PD-L1 and VEGF has enhanced anticancer immunity through multiple mechanisms and augmented antitumour activity in multiple malignancies. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) alone and combined with bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods GO30140 is an open-label, multicentre, multiarm, phase 1b study that enrolled patients at 26 academic centres and community oncology practices in seven countries worldwide. The study included five cohorts, and the two hepatocellular carcinoma cohorts, groups A and F, are described here. Inclusion criteria for these two groups included age 18 years and older; histologically, cytologically, or clinically (per American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria) confirmed unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma that was not amenable to curative treatment; no previous systemic treatment; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. In group A, all patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) intravenously every 3 weeks. In group F, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous atezolizumab (1200 mg) plus intravenous bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks or atezolizumab alone by interactive voice-web response system using permuted block randomisation (block size of two) and stratification factors of geographical region; macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both; and baseline a-fetoprotein concentration. Primary endpoints were confirmed objective response rate in all patients who received the combination treatment for group A and progression-free survival in the intention-totreat population in group F, both assessed by an independent review facility according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. In both groups, safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of any study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02715531, and is closed to enrolment. Findings In group A, 104 patients were enrolled between July 20,2016, and July 31,2018, and received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. With a median follow-up of 12.4 months (IQR 8.0-16.2), 37 (36%; 95% CI 26-46) of 104 patients had a confirmed objective response. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (13 [13%]) and proteinuria (seven [7%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 25 (24%) patients and treatment-related deaths in three (3%) patients (abnormal hepatic function, hepatic cirrhosis, and pneumonitis). In group F, 119 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (60 to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab; 59 to atezolizumab monotherapy) between May 18,2018, and March 7,2019. With a median follow-up of 6.6 months (IQR 5.5-8.5) for the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and 6.7 months (4.2-8.2) for the atezolizumab monotherapy group, median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.6-7.4) versus 3.4 months (1.9-5.2; hazard ratio 0.55; 80% CI 0.40-0.74; p=0.011). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in group F were hypertension (in three [5%] patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group; none in the atezolizumab monotherapy group) and proteinuria (in two [3%] patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group; none in the atezolizumab monotherapy group). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in seven (12%) patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and two (3%) patients in the atezolizumab monotherapy group. There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation Our study shows longer progression-free survival with a combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab than with atezolizumab alone in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma not previously treated with systemic therapy. Therefore, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab might become a promising treatment option for these patients. This combination is being compared with standard-of-care sorafenib in a phase 3 trial. Copyright (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Frontline Anti-Pd-1/pd-l1 Versus Bevacizumab in Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: a Network Meta-Analysis

PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of three randomised trials

Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone As the First‐line Treatment of PD‐L1‐negative and Driver‐gene‐negative Advanced Nonsquamous Non‐small‐cell Lung Cancer: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

PD-1 inhibitor versus bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective-real world study

First-Line Treatment Options For Pd-L1-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety in the treatment strategies between chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic and with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative PD-L1 expression: A network meta-analysis

Compare the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Bayesian analysis.

Direct Comparison Between the Addition of Pembrolizumab or Bevacizumab for Chemotherapy-Based First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Lacking Driver Mutations

Efficacy and safety of anti ‐PD ‐1/ PD‐L1 in combination with chemotherapy or not as first‐line treatment for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

PD-1/L1 With or Without CTLA-4 Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Anti-PD-(L)1-Based Neoadjuvant Therapy in Head and Neck Carcinoma: a Meta-analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials.

The efficacy of bevacizumab combined with platinum-containing chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

First‐line PD ‐1/ PD‐L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non‐squamous non‐small cell lung cancer: A Bayesian network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Atezolizumab with or Without Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (GO30140): an Open-Label, Multicentre, Phase 1b Study

Randomized Clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab Vs Chemotherapy for Previously Untreated Chinese Patients with PD‐L1‐positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non–small‐cell Lung Cancer: KEYNOTE‐042 China Study

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy Versus PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison of the profiles of first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC lacking driver gene mutations: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Pd-1 and Anti-Pd-l1 Antibody in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a Meta-Analysis.

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies Versus Docetaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer

Effectiveness and Safety of Adding Bevacizumab to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis