Brain-age prediction: Systematic evaluation of site effects, and sample age range and size

Yuetong Yu,Hao-Qi Cui,Shalaila S Haas,Faye New,Nicole Sanford,Kevin Yu,Denghuang Zhan,Guoyuan Yang,Jia-Hong Gao,Dongtao Wei,Jiang Qiu,Nerisa Banaj,Dorret I Boomsma,Alan Breier,Henry Brodaty,Randy L Buckner,Jan K Buitelaar,Dara M Cannon,Xavier Caseras,Vincent P Clark,Patricia J Conrod,Fabrice Crivello,Eveline A Crone,Udo Dannlowski,Christopher G Davey,Lieuwe de Haan,Greig I de Zubicaray,Annabella Di Giorgio,Lukas Fisch,Simon E Fisher,Barbara Franke,David C Glahn,Dominik Grotegerd,Oliver Gruber,Raquel E Gur,Ruben C Gur,Tim Hahn,Ben J Harrison,Sean Hatton,Ian B Hickie,Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol,Alec J Jamieson,Terry L Jernigan,Jiyang Jiang,Andrew J Kalnin,Sim Kang,Nicole A Kochan,Anna Kraus,Jim Lagopoulos,Luisa Lazaro,Brenna C McDonald,Colm McDonald,Katie L McMahon,Benson Mwangi,Fabrizio Piras,Raul Rodriguez-Cruces,Jessica Royer,Perminder S Sachdev,Theodore D Satterthwaite,Andrew J Saykin,Gunter Schumann,Pierluigi Sevaggi,Jordan W Smoller,Jair C Soares,Gianfranco Spalletta,Christian K Tamnes,Julian N Trollor,Dennis Van't Ent,Daniela Vecchio,Henrik Walter,Yang Wang,Bernd Weber,Wei Wen,Lara M Wierenga,Steven C R Williams,Mon-Ju Wu,Giovana B Zunta-Soares,Boris Bernhardt,Paul Thompson,Sophia Frangou,Ruiyang Ge,ENIGMA‐Lifespan Working Group

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26768

2024-07-15

Abstract:Structural neuroimaging data have been used to compute an estimate of the biological age of the brain (brain-age) which has been associated with other biologically and behaviorally meaningful measures of brain development and aging. The ongoing research interest in brain-age has highlighted the need for robust and publicly available brain-age models pre-trained on data from large samples of healthy individuals. To address this need we have previously released a developmental brain-age model. Here we expand this work to develop, empirically validate, and disseminate a pre-trained brain-age model to cover most of the human lifespan. To achieve this, we selected the best-performing model after systematically examining the impact of seven site harmonization strategies, age range, and sample size on brain-age prediction in a discovery sample of brain morphometric measures from 35,683 healthy individuals (age range: 5-90 years; 53.59% female). The pre-trained models were tested for cross-dataset generalizability in an independent sample comprising 2101 healthy individuals (age range: 8-80 years; 55.35% female) and for longitudinal consistency in a further sample comprising 377 healthy individuals (age range: 9-25 years; 49.87% female). This empirical examination yielded the following findings: (1) the accuracy of age prediction from morphometry data was higher when no site harmonization was applied; (2) dividing the discovery sample into two age-bins (5-40 and 40-90 years) provided a better balance between model accuracy and explained age variance than other alternatives; (3) model accuracy for brain-age prediction plateaued at a sample size exceeding 1600 participants. These findings have been incorporated into CentileBrain (https://centilebrain.org/#/brainAGE2), an open-science, web-based platform for individualized neuroimaging metrics.