Giuseppe Pontillo,Ferran Prados,Jordan Colman,Baris Kanber,Omar Abdel-Mannan,Sarmad Al-Araji,Barbara Ballenberg,Alessia Bianchi,Alvino Bisecco,Wallace Brownlee,Arturo Brunetti,Alessandro Cagol,Massimiliano Calabrese,Marco Castellaro,Ronja Christensen,Sirio Cocozza,Elisa Colato,Sara Collorone,Rosa Cortese,Nicola De Stefano,Christian Enzinger,Massimo Filippi,Michael A. Foster,Antonio Gallo,Claudio Gasperini,Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla,Cristina Granziera,Sergiu Groppa,Yael Hacohen,Hanne F. Harbo,Anna He,Einar A. Høgestøl,Jens Kuhle,Sara Llufriu,Carsten Lukas,Eloy Martinez-Heras,Silvia Messina,Marcello Moccia,Suraya Mohamud,Riccardo Nistri,Gro O. Nygaard,Jacqueline Palace,Maria Petracca,Daniela Pinter,Maria A. Rocca,Alex Rovira,Serena Ruggieri,Jaume Sastre-Garriga,Eva Strijbis,Ahmed Toosy,Tomas Uher,Paola Valsasina,Manuela Vaneckova,Hugo Vrenken,Jed Wingrove,Charmaine Yam,Menno M. Schoonheim,Olga Ciccarelli,James H. Cole,Frederik Barkhof,the MAGNIMS study group

Abstract:Disentangling brain ageing from disease-related neurodegeneration in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is increasingly topical. The brain-age paradigm offers a window into this problem but may miss disease-specific effects. Here, we statistically modelled disease duration (DD) in PwMS as a function of brain MRI scans and evaluated whether the brain-predicted DD gap (i.e., the difference between predicted and actual duration) could complement the brain-age gap as a DD-adjusted global measure of multiple sclerosis-specific brain damage. In this retrospective study, we used 3D T1-weighted brain MRI scans of PwMS (i) from a large multicentric dataset (n = 4,392) for age and DD modelling, and (ii) from a monocentric longitudinal cohort of patients with early multiple sclerosis (n = 252 patients, 749 sessions) for clinical validation. We trained and tested a deep learning model based on a 3D DenseNet architecture to predict DD from minimally pre-processed brain MRI scans, while age predictions were obtained with the previously validated DeepBrainNet algorithm. Model predictions were scrutinised to assess the influence of lesions and brain volumes, while the DD gap metric was biologically and clinically validated within a linear model framework assessing its relationship with brain-age gap values and with physical disability measured with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Our model predicted DD better than chance (mean absolute error = 5.63 years, R = 0.34) and was nearly orthogonal to the brain-age model, as suggested by the very weak correlation between DD gap and brain-age gap values ( = 0.06). DD predictions were influenced by spatially distributed variations in brain volume, and, unlike brain-predicted age, were sensitive to the presence of lesions (mean difference between unfilled and filled scans: 0.55 ± 0.57 years, < 0.001). The DD gap metric significantly explained EDSS scores (β = 0.060, < 0.001), adding to brain-age gap values (ΔR = 0.012, < 0.001). Longitudinally, increasing annualised DD gap was associated with greater annualised EDSS changes ( = 0.50, < 0.001), with a significant incremental contribution in explaining disability worsening compared to changes of the brain-age gap alone (ΔR = 0.064, < 0.001). The brain-predicted DD gap metric appears to be sensitive to multiple sclerosis-related lesions and brain atrophy, adding to the brain-age paradigm in explaining physical disability both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Potentially, it may be used as a multiple sclerosis-specific biomarker of disease severity and progression.

BrainAgeNeXt: Advancing Brain Age Modeling for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Analysis and visualization of the effect of multiple sclerosis on biological brain age

Estimated Brain Age in Healthy Aging and Across Multiple Neurological Disorders

Brain Age Estimation on a Dementia Cohort Using FLAIR MRI Biomarkers

Disentangling neurodegeneration from ageing in multiple sclerosis: the brain-predicted disease duration gap

Age Prediction Using Resting-State Functional MRI

A deep learning model for brain age prediction using minimally preprocessed T1w images as input

Brain-age prediction: Systematic evaluation of site effects, and sample age range and size

Brain age identification from diffusion MRI synergistically predicts neurodegenerative disease

MRI Signatures of Brain Age in the Alzheimer’s Disease Continuum

Brain age prediction across the human lifespan using multimodal MRI data

Analysis of Brain Age Gap across Subject Cohorts and Prediction Model Architectures

Enhancing Brain Age Estimation with a Multimodal 3D CNN Approach Combining Structural MRI and AI-Synthesized Cerebral Blood Volume Data

Optimising brain age estimation through transfer learning: A suite of pre‐trained foundation models for improved performance and generalisability in a clinical setting

Brain age gap in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and multiple sclerosis

Deep Neural Networks Learn General and Clinically Relevant Representations of the Ageing Brain

Systematic evaluation of machine learning algorithms for neuroanatomically-based age prediction in youth.

Brain Age Prediction with 3D ResNet34 Model in Healthy Control, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer's Disease

Brain age acceleration as biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease progression: Functional network connectivity analysis

Predicting Brain Age of Healthy Adults Based on Structural MRI Parcellation Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Gray Matter Age Prediction as a Biomarker for Risk of Dementia