Life cycle assessment of alternative pulp mill sludge treatment methods in Finland

Orlando Salcedo-Puerto,Marie Breton,Ekaterina Sermyagina,Lindomar Gonçalves,Marcelo Cardoso,Jouni Havukainen,Esa Vakkilainen,Clara Mendoza-Martinez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.06.025
2024-09-15
Abstract:Proper management of wastewater treatment plant side streams in pulp and paper mills is a matter of great interest. This study evaluates the environmental impact of different strategies in the management of biosludge from pulp and paper mills in Finland through a Life Cycle Assessment methodology. The base industrial standard practice, biosludge incineration for energy recovery and ash landfill disposal (Scenario 1), was compared to the alternative process of hydrothermal carbonization. The hydrochar generated from hydrothermal carbonization was evaluated for energy recovery through incineration (Scenario 2), or for use in composting for nutrient recovery (Scenario 3). The results showed that the hydrothermal process improved the overall environmental performance of the sludge management, particularly in terms of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. The use of hydrochar as a soil amendment in composting also resulted in a significant reduction on the environmental impact compared to the other two scenarios. Overall, this study highlights the potential of hydrothermal carbonization and hydrochar utilization as sustainable options for managing biosludge from pulp mills.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?