Phase 2a, open-label, dose-escalating, multi-center pharmacokinetic study of favipiravir (T-705) in combination with oseltamivir in patients with severe influenza
Yeming Wang,Wu Zhong,Alex Salam,Joel Tarning,Qingyuan Zhan,Jian-an Huang,Heng Weng,Changqing Bai,Yanhong Ren,Koichi Yamada,Dayan Wang,Qiang Guo,Qiongqiong Fang,Sakurai Tsutomu,Xiaohui Zou,Haibo Li,Annelies Gillesen,Lyndsey Castle,Cheng Chen,Hongyan Li,Jing Zhen,Binghuai Lu,Jun Duan,Liping Guo,Jinfang Jiang,Ruiyuan Cao,Guohui Fan,Jintong Li,Frederick G. Hayden,Chen Wang,Peter Horby,Bin Cao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103125
IF: 11.205
2020-12-01
EBioMedicine
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>The pharmacokinetics and appropriate dose regimens of favipiravir are unknown in hospitalized influenza patients; such data are also needed to determine dosage selection for favipiravir trials in COVID-19.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>In this dose-escalating study, favipiravir pharmacokinetics and tolerability were assessed in critically ill influenza patients. Participants received one of two dosing regimens; Japan licensed dose (1600 mg BID on day 1 and 600 mg BID on the following days) and the higher dose (1800 mg/800 mg BID) trialed in uncomplicated influenza. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoint was the proportion of patients with a minimum observed plasma trough concentration (C<sub>trough</sub>) ≥20 mg/L at all measured time points after the second dose.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Sixteen patients were enrolled into the low dose group and 19 patients into the high dose group of the study. Favipiravir C<sub>trough</sub> decreased significantly over time in both groups (<em>p</em> <0.01). Relative to day 2 (48 hrs), concentrations were 91.7% and 90.3% lower in the 1600/600 mg group and 79.3% and 89.5% lower in the 1800/800 mg group at day 7 and 10, respectively. In contrast, oseltamivir concentrations did not change significantly over time. A 2-compartment disposition model with first-order absorption and elimination described the observed favipiravir concentration-time data well. Modeling demonstrated that less than 50% of patients achieved C<sub>trough</sub> ≥20 mg/L for >80% of the duration of treatment of the two dose regimens evaluated (18.8% and 42.1% of patients for low and high dose regimen, respectively). Increasing the favipravir dosage predicted a higher proportion of patients reaching this threshold of 20 mg/L, suggesting that dosing regimens of ≥3600/2600 mg might be required for adequate concentrations. The two dosing regimens were well-tolerated in critical ill patients with influenza.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>The two dosing regimens proposed for uncomplicated influenza did not achieve our pre-defined treatment threshold.</p>
medicine, research & experimental