Phase 2a, open-label, dose-escalating, multi-center pharmacokinetic study of favipiravir (T-705) in combination with oseltamivir in patients with severe influenza

Yeming Wang,Wu Zhong,Alex Salam,Joel Tarning,Qingyuan Zhan,Jian-an Huang,Heng Weng,Changqing Bai,Yanhong Ren,Koichi Yamada,Dayan Wang,Qiang Guo,Qiongqiong Fang,Sakurai Tsutomu,Xiaohui Zou,Haibo Li,Annelies Gillesen,Lyndsey Castle,Cheng Chen,Hongyan Li,Jing Zhen,Binghuai Lu,Jun Duan,Liping Guo,Jinfang Jiang,Ruiyuan Cao,Guohui Fan,Jintong Li,Frederick G. Hayden,Chen Wang,Peter Horby,Bin Cao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103125
IF: 11.205
2020-12-01
EBioMedicine
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>The pharmacokinetics and appropriate dose regimens of favipiravir are unknown in hospitalized influenza patients; such data are also needed to determine dosage selection for favipiravir trials in COVID-19.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>In this dose-escalating study, favipiravir pharmacokinetics and tolerability were assessed in critically ill influenza patients. Participants received one of two dosing regimens; Japan licensed dose (1600 mg BID on day 1 and 600 mg BID on the following days) and the higher dose (1800 mg/800 mg BID) trialed in uncomplicated influenza. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoint was the proportion of patients with a minimum observed plasma trough concentration (C<sub>trough</sub>) ≥20 mg/L at all measured time points after the second dose.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Sixteen patients were enrolled into the low dose group and 19 patients into the high dose group of the study. Favipiravir C<sub>trough</sub> decreased significantly over time in both groups (<em>p</em> &lt;0.01). Relative to day 2 (48 hrs), concentrations were 91.7% and 90.3% lower in the 1600/600 mg group and 79.3% and 89.5% lower in the 1800/800 mg group at day 7 and 10, respectively. In contrast, oseltamivir concentrations did not change significantly over time. A 2-compartment disposition model with first-order absorption and elimination described the observed favipiravir concentration-time data well. Modeling demonstrated that less than 50% of patients achieved C<sub>trough</sub> ≥20 mg/L for &gt;80% of the duration of treatment of the two dose regimens evaluated (18.8% and 42.1% of patients for low and high dose regimen, respectively). Increasing the favipravir dosage predicted a higher proportion of patients reaching this threshold of 20 mg/L, suggesting that dosing regimens of ≥3600/2600 mg might be required for adequate concentrations. The two dosing regimens were well-tolerated in critical ill patients with influenza.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>The two dosing regimens proposed for uncomplicated influenza did not achieve our pre-defined treatment threshold.</p>
medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics and tolerability of favipiravir in hospitalized patients with severe influenza. Specifically, the study aims to determine whether the lowest observed plasma trough concentration (C trough) of favipiravir in patients with severe influenza under two different dosage regimens can reach or exceed the preset treatment threshold (20 mg/L), and the safety of these dosage regimens in severe patients. ### Research Background - **Seasonal Influenza**: Despite the availability of vaccines and antiviral drugs, seasonal influenza still causes a large number of morbidity and mortality globally. - **Pandemic Influenza**: It is a serious global health threat, and vaccines may not be available in a timely manner in the early stages of a pandemic. - **Oseltamivir**: A neuraminidase inhibitor currently widely used in influenza treatment, but its efficacy in patients with severe influenza is controversial, and resistance problems have emerged. ### Research Objectives - **Pharmacokinetic Evaluation**: Evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of favipiravir in patients with severe influenza, especially whether its lowest observed plasma trough concentration (C trough) can reach or exceed 20 mg/L. - **Tolerability Evaluation**: Evaluate the tolerability of two different dosage regimens (1600 mg/600 mg and 1800 mg/800 mg) in patients with severe influenza. - **Dose Selection**: Provide a basis for dose selection in future favipiravir clinical trials for COVID - 19. ### Methods - **Study Design**: This is an open - label, dose - escalation, multicenter phase 2a study. - **Dosage Regimens**: - Phase 1: 1600 mg BID (twice a day) on day 1, followed by 600 mg BID for 9 days. - Phase 2: 1800 mg BID on day 1, followed by 800 mg BID for 9 days. - **Sample Size**: At least 15 patients in each phase. - **Study Sites**: Four academic hospitals in China (two in Beijing, one in Suzhou, and one in Fuzhou). ### Results - **Pharmacokinetic Results**: - The lowest observed plasma trough concentration (C trough) of favipiravir decreased significantly over time in both dosage groups (p < 0.01). - In the 1600 mg/600 mg dosage group, 56.3% of patients reached or exceeded 20 mg/L on day 2, and this proportion decreased to 18.8% by day 10. - In the 1800 mg/800 mg dosage group, 78.9% of patients reached or exceeded 20 mg/L on day 2, and this proportion decreased to 37.5% by day 10. - **Tolerability Results**: Both dosage regimens were well - tolerated in patients with severe influenza. ### Conclusions - **Main Findings**: Both dosage regimens failed to reach the preset pharmacokinetic endpoint (C trough ≥ 20 mg/L) in patients with severe influenza, possibly due to accelerated metabolism. - **Future Directions**: Further optimization of the favipiravir dosage regimen is required to ensure that effective treatment concentrations are achieved in patients with severe influenza and RNA virus infections (such as COVID - 19). Through this study, researchers hope to provide important pharmacokinetic and safety data for future clinical trials, thereby optimizing the application of favipiravir in severe patients.