Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Comitant Esotropia in an Adult Population Between 18 and 60 Years Old

Kara M Cavuoto,Charlotte Tibi,Potyra R Rosa,Hilda Capo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.06.012
2024-06-14
Abstract:Purpose: To describe the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of adults with comitant nonaccommodative esotropia. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: Retrospective review of medical records of patients 18 to 60 years old with comitant esotropia who underwent strabismus surgery at a tertiary eye care center between 2014 and 2023. The etiology of esotropia was categorized into three groups based on the disparity between near-distance angles of deviation: (1) basic esotropia (ETBA); (2) esotropia divergence insufficiency pattern; or (3) esotropia convergence excess pattern. The main outcome measures were strabismus characteristics and motor and sensory surgical outcomes. Surgical motor success was defined as a deviation that measured ≤10 prism diopters (PD). Results: Of the 219 that met the inclusion criteria, most patients were female (140, 64%) and had a mean age of 36.7 ± 12.3 years (range 18-60 years). The majority were myopic (157, 72%) and reported diplopia (176/219, 80.3%). The esotropia convergence excess pattern group had the largest mean deviations at both distance (45.5 ± 11.5 PD) and near (64 ± 12.3 PD) while the ETBA group had the largest ranges at distance (31 ± 13.5 PD, range 3-90) and near (30 ± 15 PD, range 2-85). Bilateral medial rectus recession and unilateral recess-resect procedures were performed with equal frequency (both 48%). Motor and sensory success were achieved more often with recess-resect than bilateral medial rectus recession, although only motor success was statistically significant (87.8% vs. 73.2%, P = .0375 and 93.3% vs. 85.5%, P = 15, respectively). At the last encounter, 88.1% (119/135) of patients with preoperative diplopia achieved single binocular vision. Conclusions: Regardless of the pattern of esotropia, strabismus surgery in adults with comitant nonaccommodative esotropia resulted in good motor and sensory outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?